NLRP3 polymorphism is associated with protection against human T-lymphotropic virus 1 infection

Inter-individual heterogeneity in the response to human T-lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1) infection has been partially attributed to host genetic background. The antiviral activity of the inflammasome cytoplasmic complex recognises viral molecular patterns and regulates immune responses via the activation of interleukin (IL)-1 family (IL-1, IL-18 and IL-33) members. The association between polymorphisms in the inflammasome receptors NLRP1 and NLRP3 and HTLV-1 infection was evaluated in a northeastern Brazilian population (84 HTLV-1 carriers and 155 healthy controls). NLRP3 rs10754558 G/G was associated with protection against HTLV-1 infection (p = 0.012; odds ratio = 0.37). rs10754558 affects NLRP3 mRNA stability; therefore, our results suggest that higher NLRP3 expression may augment first-line defences, leading to the effective protection against HTLV-1 infection.

Protection from HIV-1 infection of primary CD4 T cells by CCR5 silencing is effective for the full spectrum of CCR5 expression.

Stable gene silencing by RNA interference (RNAi) can be achieved by expression of small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) from RNA polymerase III promoters. We have tested lentiviral vectors expressing shRNAs targetting CCR5 in primary CD4 T cells from donors representing various CCR5 and CCR2 genetic backgrounds covering the full spectrum of CCR5 expression levels and permissiveness for HIV-1 infection. A linear decrease in CCR5 expression resulted in a logarithmic decrease in cellular infection, giving up to three logs protection from HIV-1 infection in vitro. Protection was maintained at very high multiplicity of infection. This and other recent reports on RNAi should open a debate about the use of RNAi gene therapy for HIV infection.

DNA prime-protein boost based vaccination with a conserved region of leptospiral immunoglobulin-like A and B proteins enhances protection against leptospirosis

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic spirochetes of theLeptospira genus. Vaccination with bacterins has severe limitations. Here, we evaluated the N-terminal region of the leptospiral immunoglobulin-like B protein (LigBrep) as a vaccine candidate against leptospirosis using immunisation strategies based on DNA prime-protein boost, DNA vaccine, and subunit vaccine. Upon challenge with a virulent strain ofLeptospira interrogans, the prime-boost and DNA vaccine approaches induced significant protection in hamsters, as well as a specific IgG antibody response and sterilising immunity. Although vaccination with recombinant fragment of LigBrep also produced a strong antibody response, it was not immunoprotective. These results highlight the potential of LigBrep as a candidate antigen for an effective vaccine against leptospirosis and emphasise the use of the DNA prime-protein boost as an important strategy for vaccine development.

La protection des biotopes en droit suisse : étude de droit matériel

Introduction : Confronter les intérêts de la protection de la nature à d'autres, c'est vouloir faire passer les petites fleurs et les grenouilles avant l'Homme. Hérésie ! C'est en effet parfois l'existence même d'un régime légal de protection des biotopes qui fait sourire. L'étudier en profondeur n'en paraît que plus oiseux. Ce problème d'acceptation est sans doute propre au droit de l'environnement de manière générale : l'intérêt public défendu ici n'est pas rattachable directement à l'intérêt du plus grand nombre. On peut parfois même en être très loin. Si, malgré cela, certains domaines du droit de l'environnement sont actuellement très en vogue, la protection de la nature fait partie de ses aspects moins porteurs. Ce type de préoccupations est pour beaucoup futile, voire inutile ou même déplacé. Il apparaît ainsi important de commencer par se demander pourquoi protéger la nature, et que protéger dans cette nature (chapitre 1). Vient ensuite évidemment la question de la portée de la protection. Il convient pour cela tout d'abord de faire le point sur le droit en vigueur (chapitre 2) : l'histoire des règles topiques en matière de protection des biotopes a été particulièrement mouvementée et son analyse apporte un important éclairage à la compréhension des dispositions actuelles ; cette législation est en outre complétée par une multitude de dispositions connexes ou apparentées, de droit interne et de droit international. Ce contexte général posé, la portée de la protection s'examine plus précisément par l'analyse des articles 18 ss LPN (chapitre 3) : les biotopes protégés de manière générale par l'article 18 LPN lui-même - remarquable exemple d'un droit dynamique -, les biotopes inventoriés et la végétation des rives. Il est enfin nécessaire de se pencher sur le « comment protéger» par une étude des instruments de mise en oeuvre (chapitre 4) et des instruments auxiliaires à la protection (chapitre 5). Ce faisant, la pertinence du régime légal de protection des biotopes sera soulignée, tant sur le fond que sur la forme. En l'introduisant aux subtilités de ce régime et de son intégration dans l'ordre juridique en général, nous espérons ainsi faire passer le lecteur au-delà des idées reçues.

Synthesis of Best Practice for Increasing Protection and Visibility of Highway Maintenance Vehicles, CTRE Final Report Iowa DOT Project TR-475, August 2002

The purpose of this research project is to study current practices in enhancing visibility and protection of highway maintenance vehicles involved in moving operations such as snow removal and shoulder operations, crack sealing, and pothole patching. The results will enable the maintenance staff to adequately assess the applicability and impact of each strategy to their use and budget. The report’s literature review chapter examines the use of maintenance vehicle warning lights, retroreflective tapes, shadow vehicles and truck-mounted attenuators, and advanced vehicle control systems, as well as other practices to improve visibility for both snowplow operators and vehicles. The chapter concludes that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices does not specify what color or kind of warning lights to use. Thus, a wide variety of lights are being used on maintenance vehicles. The study of the relevant literatures also suggests that there are no clear guidelines for moving work zones at this time. Two types of surveys were conducted to determine current practices to improve visibility and safety in moving work zones across the country and in the state of Iowa. In the first survey of state departments of transportation, most indicated using amber warning lights on their maintenance vehicles. Almost all the responding states indicated using some form of reflective material on their vehicles to make them more visible. Most participating states indicated that the color of their vehicles is orange. Most states indicated using more warning lights on snow removal vehicles than their other maintenance vehicles. All responding state agencies indicated using shadow vehicles and/or truck-mounted attenuators during their moving operations. In the second survey of Iowa counties, most indicated using very similar traffic control and warning devices during their granular road maintenance and snow removal operations. Mounting warning signs and rotating or strobe lights on the rear of maintenance vehicles is common for Iowa counties. The most common warning devices used during the counties’ snow removal operations are reflective tapes, warning flags, strobe lights, and auxiliary headlamps.