869 resultados para JUSTICE SYSTEM
Resumo:
The present dissertation, elaborated is based on the deductive method, through the use of the General Theory of Resources concepts, by the main types of judgments existing in the Code of Civil Procedure, the interlocutory judgment and sentence, as well as the features and effects that challenge these decisions, we sought to identify on this theme one of the greatest evils facing the justice system in the world, which is the processing delays. This slowness in adjudication affects seriously the principle of effectiveness, one of the postulates of procedural law and society as a whole. Thus, the use of tort serves to fight the interlocutory decision and appeal which challenges the judge`s ruling. It is a resource for excellence in appellate system as it meets with the most awaited decision of the process. In weighing the importance of the appeal that seeks to oppose the court decision today by the numerous reforms that the procedural system has been through, it has ended up to transform the process ineffective or inconsistent, for it is much easier to have efficacy in a interlocutory decision for preliminary injunction than by judgment on the merits of the judge. This is due to the prevision of the resources and their effect to those decisions. That is, the interlocutory decision involves interlocutory appeal only in the devolved effect, allowing its provisional execution, and the sentence has as recourse to appeal the double effect, remanding and suspension, which necessarily prevents its provisional execution. But it undeniably shows a paradox, because as to give effect to a measure that is based on a mere probability by a summary cognition, partial and superficial, and stop it on a decision by a court that is closer to the truth and sure, for a full and depleting cognition? It is seriously affect the principle of effectiveness. Therefore, starting from this ineffectiveness, sought to defend the solution of this problem with the approval of the bill n. º 3.605/2004 or the new Code of Civil Procedure project that modifies the general rule the effects of appeal. That is, remanding and suspensive, as to merely remanding effect to and thereby enable the provisional execution of the judgment of the court of the first degree of jurisdiction, giving effectiveness and enhancing the decision of the magistrate, making a fair distribution of time in the process and better guaranteed principle of access to justice
Resumo:
This study aims to identify the relation between adolescents in conflict with the penal law, who were convicted to assisted freedom (a socio-educative measure applied by the Juvenile Justice system as a sanction to adolescent offenders), and the school. The research was developed in the Community-based Assisted Freedom Program of Pastoral do Menor , in Fortaleza (capital city of Ceará State, Brazil). The study has engaged 21 adolescents, eight program professionals, three members of the Center for Defense of Child Rights in Ceará, five teachers and eight school principals and education managers from the schools attended by the adolescents in the neighborhoods of Pirambu, Tancredo Neves, Jardim Iracema e Bom Jardim. It intends, based on dialectical and historical method, to define the investigated adolescents as persons with a very singular insertion into the social structures of neoliberal capitalism. Their adolescence is subject to consumerism appeals, to the limits imposed by these appeals and to perverse ways of insertion in the system, such as criminalization, segregation and marginalization. It reveals that the school attended by the adolescents reproduces such conditions of insertion. At the same time, these conditions are elements of identity, by which the adolescents are characterized.
Resumo:
The Brazilian democratic transition, still underway today, has run up against enormous difficulty in incorporating penal action. Or, put in yet stronger terms, we could say that the boundaries of democratization processes, delineated through the action of that sector of the State, reveal the possibility that the juridical field remains immune to democratizing change. Although prevailing discourse among law professionals asserts that Penal Justice is undergoing democratization, what we have observed in practice is a strong resistance within the juridical field to assuming political responsibilities within the consolidation of democracy. This article reports analyses and conclusions formulated through observation of the Brazilian penal justice system that gave origin to the thesis entitled Penal Justice in Brazil today: democratic discourse, authoritarian practice. The research sought to reflect on contemporary criminal justice policy, which has been guided by the widening of repression and the continued use of incarceration. Such policy, carried out in Brazil since the beginning of the 1985 political opening has adjusted itself to the liberal project that is also currently underway in the country, as well as in almost the entire Western capitalist world. As we can observe, Penal Justice, even during the execution of sentences, operates in authoritarian and exclusive ways, suppressing the rights guaranteed by law to those who have been sentenced and adopting extremely repressive forms as demonstrated by the extremely sparse benefits that it concedes. Thus, in Brazil, criminality has generally been responded through severe sentences, reflected in the absence of guarantees of constitutional rights and ample recourse to incarceration. In this vein, our contemporary democratic governments have frequently adopted a punitive stance that seeks to reaffirm the State's aptitudes for punishing and controlling criminality. © 2009 Revista de Sociologia e Política.
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Educação - IBRC
Resumo:
A disturbing token of child and adolescent vulnerability in Latin America and the Caribbean is that so many are deprived of any legal identity by failure to report their birth. This bars them from exercising basic citizen rights and can hinder their access to productive employment, social benefits and the justice system and deny them recognition as full citizens and the right to well-being, capacity development and political participation.
Resumo:
O presente trabalho aborda, no âmbito das ciências sociais, as percepções que as mulheres sentenciadas a regime fechado no Centro de Reeducação Feminino (CRF), presídio feminino localizado no estado do Pará, constroem sobre o sistema penal no qual estão inseridas, partindo do que as mesmas se referem/representam como sendo crime, justiça e liberdade ― categorias básicas para a pesquisa que, afinal, serviram, principalmente, para revelar um mundo maior de correlações dentro do espaço pesquisado. A discussão apresentada é proveniente do trabalho de campo realizado no ano de 2010 e no primeiro semestre de 2011, com um grupo de doze interlocutoras, duas agentes prisionais e dois policiais que foram entrevistados no intuito de evidenciar as diferentes relações instituídas a partir da vida no cárcere. Nesta perspectiva, os dados relativos à pesquisa aludem para o fato de que o presídio feminino não é simples espaço onde as interlocutoras estão pela obrigatoriedade do cumprimento da pena; ele é reelaborado e ressignificado cotidianamente, marcando as mudanças de valores, concepções e condutas das mulheres sentenciadas, transformando as certezas da vida anterior ao cárcere em dúvidas recorrentes e que também criam oportunidades de novos arranjos sociais.
Resumo:
As instituições do sistema de justiça ao redor do mundo têm ocupado importantes espaços no cenário político-institucional, atuando como verdadeiros atores políticos dotados de recursos de poder. Esse fenômeno de judicialização da vida pública tem ocorrido no Brasil, sobejamente após a promulgação da Constituição Federal de 1988. Os atores do sistema de justiça passaram a exercer importante influência sobre a vida social, econômica e política do país, atuando na afirmação de novos direitos e na construção da agenda pública. À luz deste contexto a presente dissertação analisa a judicialização da política na realidade político-institucional brasileira, delimitando, todavia, o seu campo de estudo à atuação das unidades da Defensoria Pública da União nos Estados que integram a Amazônia Legal em conflitos de natureza coletiva, buscando compreender fundamentalmente as formas judiciais e extrajudiciais de resolução de conflitos, os critérios de atuação da instituição neste tipo de controvérsias, bem como os resultados das ações e relações com o judiciário. A ideia central é a de que os mecanismos que proporcionam inclusão no sistema de justiça podem desempenhar um papel importante na afirmação de direitos e na construção da agenda pública.
Resumo:
Neste trabalho, analisamos a governança eleitoral exercida pelo TRE/PA, especialmente o seu nível de isenção no contencioso eleitoral (rule adjudication) concernente aos pleitos majoritários (governador e senador) de 1982 e 1986, com retrospecto no período de 1945 a 1965 - o primeiro momento de atuação contínua e prolongada da Justiça Eleitoral num contexto democrático, isto é, antes do Golpe Militar de 1964. Partimos do pressuposto segundo o qual, dada a peculiar composição da Justiça Eleitoral, que funciona tomando de empréstimo magistrados da justiça comum - sendo os TRE‟s compostos, em sua maioria, por membros dos tribunais de justiça estaduais -, somado ao padrão de relacionamento executivo-judiciário estadual, em que, historicamente, constatamos uma hipertrofia do primeiro em relação ao segundo poder, estimamos existir uma grande probabilidade de favorecimento do TRE aos candidatos majoritários do partido governamental. Esta circunstância seria agravada no período histórico em tela, em vista da enorme ingerência do executivo estadual sobre o respectivo poder judiciário, verificada anteriormente à promulgação da Constituição Federal de 1988. Com efeito, encontramos fortes indícios a corroborar esta hipótese no período 1945-65, mas não encontramos evidências suficientes para sustentá-la por ocasião dos pleitos de 1982 e 1986. No pleito de 1982, o TRE manifestou razoável grau de isenção e coerência em seus acórdãos, exceto em dois processos semelhantes: um deles provocado pelo PDS e o outro pelo PMDB, ambos envolvendo um número expressivo de votos. O PMDB, partido então patrocinado pelo governador, venceu a lide, enquanto o PDS, o partido oposicionista, foi derrotado. No tocante, ao pleito de 1986, observamos uma disposição da Corte para denegar os pedidos propostos pelas legendas oposicionistas, sobretudo o PT e o extinto PMB, ainda que não tenha sido possível demonstrar um claro favorecimento ao partido governamental.
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Psicologia - FCLAS
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Serviço Social - FCHS
Resumo:
Pós-graduação em Psicologia - FCLAS
Resumo:
Since the beginning of the first prisions, they were proposed to solely for custody of offenders while waiting for capital punishment. With the evolution of the society, also evolves to the form of the punishment of convicts, going to be adopted custodial sentences instead of tortured bodies, then came up a greater concern with the most suitable sites for this new purpose. This study aim to reflect and analyze the relationship between education and rehabilitation in the Brazilian criminal justice system, aiming to give the efficiency of these programs in the country and the emergence of the first forms of punishment and deprivation of liberty, presupposing the role that education presents in the social reintegration process, in a situation of deprivation of liberty and the existing public policies. Characterize and show the attempts made by the state of São Paulo in accomplishing new models of prisons, which since 2000 are called resocialization centers representing this new structure and proposed social work in relation to so-called traditional prisons
Resumo:
As the juvenile justice system has evolved, there has been a need for clinicians to make judgments about risk posed by adolescents who have committed sexual offenses. There are inherent difficulties in attempting to assess risk for violence among adolescents due to the developmental changes taking place and the absence of well-validated instruments to guide risk prediction judgments. With minority groups increasing in numbers in the U.S., it is likely that professionals will encounter minority individuals when conducting risk assessments. Overall questions regarding race/ethnicity have been neglected and there are few if any published research that explores risk factors with minority juvenile sex offenders. The present study examined whether differences exist between Caucasian and racial/ethnic minority adolescent sexual offenders on four risk assessment measures (J-SORRAT-II, J-SOAP-II, SAVRY, and ERASOR). The sample of 207 male adolescent sexual offenders was drawn from treatment facilities in a Midwestern state. Overall results indicated that minority adolescent sex offenders had fewer risk factors endorsed than Caucasian youth across all risk assessment tools. Exploration of interactions between race and factors such as: family status, exposure to family violence, and family history of criminality upon the assessment tools risk ratings yielded non-significant findings. Limitations, suggestions for future directions, and clinical implications are discussed.
Resumo:
Resumo:
Corruption is, in the last two decades, considered as one of the biggest problems within the international community, which harms not only a particular state or society but the whole world. The discussion on corruption in law and economics approach is mainly run under the veil of Public choice theory and principal-agent model. Based on this approach the strong international initiatives taken by the UN, the OECD and the Council of Europe, provided various measures and tools in order to support and guide countries in their combat against corruption. These anti-corruption policies created a repression -prevention-transparency model for corruption combat. Applying this model, countries around the world adopted anti-corruption strategies as part of their legal rules. Nevertheless, the recent researches on the effects of this move show non impressive results. Critics argue that “one size does not fit all” because the institutional setting of countries around the world varies. Among the countries which experience problems of corruption, even though they follow the dominant anti-corruption trends, are transitional, post-socialist countries. To this group belong the countries which are emerging from centrally planned to an open market economy. The socialist past left traces on institutional setting, mentality of the individuals and their interrelation, particularly in the domain of public administration. If the idiosyncrasy of these countries is taken into account the suggestion in this thesis is that in public administration in post-socialist countries, instead of dominant anti-corruption scheme repression-prevention-transparency, corruption combat should be improved through the implementation of a new one, structure-conduct-performance. The implementation of this model is based on three regulatory pyramids: anti-corruption, disciplinary anti-corruption and criminal anti-corruption pyramid. This approach asks public administration itself to engage in corruption combat, leaving criminal justice system as the ultimate weapon, used only for the very harmful misdeeds.