895 resultados para Civil procedure (Roman law)
Resumo:
This article examines the law in Australia and New Zealand that governs the withholding and withdrawal of ‘futile’ life-sustaining treatment. Although doctors have both civil and criminal law duties to treat patients, those general duties do not require the provision of treatment that is deemed to be futile. This is either because futile treatment is not in a patient’s best interests or because stopping such treatment does not breach the criminal law. This means, in the absence of a duty to treat, doctors may unilaterally withdraw or withhold treatment that is futile; consent is not required. The article then examines whether this general position has been altered by statute. It considers a range of suggested possible legislation but concludes it is likely that only Queensland’s adult guardianship legislation imposes a requirement to obtain consent to withhold or withdraw such treatment.
Resumo:
This article considers the rules relating to the use of marginal notes and headings in interpreting Queensland legislation, both in its original form and in reprinted legislation. It also examines the application of the principles of construction as to the use of section headings in the interpretation of provisions of the Criminal Code 1899 (Qld). Finally, it suggests that amendments should be made to the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld) in order to clarify the position as to the status of marginal notes and headings in statutory interpretation.
Resumo:
Increasingly, individuals want control over their own destiny. This includes the way in which they die and the timing of their death. The desire for self-determination at the end of life is one of the drivers for the ever-increasing number of jurisdictions overseas that are legalising voluntary euthanasia and/or assisted suicide, and for the continuous attempts to reform state and territory law in Australia. Despite public support for law reform in this field, legislative change in Australia is unlikely in the near future given the current political landscape. We argue that there may be another solution which provides competent adults with control over their death and to have any pain and symptoms managed by doctors, but which is currently lawful and consistent with prevailing ethical principles. ‘Voluntary palliated starvation’ refers to the process which occurs when a competent individual chooses to stop eating and drinking, and receives palliative care to address pain, suffering and symptoms that may be experienced by the individual as he or she approaches death. In this article, we argue that, at least in some circumstances, such a death would be lawful for the individual and doctors involved, and consistent with principles of medical ethics.
Resumo:
A central dimension of the State’s responsibility in a liberal democracy and any just society is the protection of individuals’ central rights and freedoms, and the creation of the minimum conditions under which each individual has an opportunity to lead a life of sufficient equality, dignity and value. A special subset of this responsibility is to protect those who are unable to protect themselves from genuine harm. Substantial numbers of children suffer serious physical, emotional and sexual abuse, and neglect at the hands of their parents and caregivers or by other known parties. Child abuse and neglect occurs in a situation of extreme power asymmetry. The physical, social, behavioural and economic costs to the individual, and the social and economic costs to communities, are vast. Children are not generally able to protect themselves from serious abuse and neglect. This enlivens both the State’s responsibility to protect the child, and the debate about how that responsibility can and should be discharged. A core question arises for all societies, given that most serious child maltreatment occurs in the family sphere, is unlikely to be disclosed, causes substantial harm to both individual and community, and infringes fundamental individual rights and freedoms. The question is: how can society identify these situations so that the maltreatment can be interrupted, the child’s needs for security and safety, and health and other rehabilitation can be met, and the family’s needs can be addressed to reduce the likelihood of recurrence? This chapter proposes a theoretical framework applicable for any society that is considering justifiable and effective policy approaches to identify and respond to cases of serious child abuse and neglect. The core of the theoretical framework is based on major principles from both classical liberal political philosophy (Locke and Mill), and leading political philosophers from the twentieth century and the first part of the new millennium (Rawls, Rorty, Okin, Nussbaum), and is further situated within fundamental frameworks of civil and criminal law, and health and economics.
Resumo:
As part of the 2014 amendments to the Youth Justice Act 1992 (Qld) the previous Queensland government introduced a new breach of bail offence and a reverse onus provision in relation to the new offence. Also included in the raft of amendments was a provision removing the internationally accepted principle that, in relation to young offenders, detention should be used as ‘a last resort’. This article argues that these changes are likely to increase the entrenchment of young people within the criminal justice system.
Resumo:
The bulk of the collection consists of two bound manuscripts (930 + 110 pages), representing the notes of the law student Bernhard Saenger during the lectures of Prof. Heinrich Dernburg in Halle, Germany on Roman law in Germany and on Roman inheritance law (Pandektenvorlesung).
Resumo:
The High Court recently heard submissions of counsel in Zaburoni v The Queen. This case concerns an appeal against conviction for transmitting a serious disease with intent under section 317(b) and (e) of the Queensland Criminal Code. It raises important issues about the meaning of intent and how intent can be proven in Queensland criminal offences. Since intent is an element of so many of the more serious crimes, it is surprising to see that the courts, both in England and Australia, continue to grapple with how best to define it. In murder, for example, the accused is potentially going to be locked up for a very long time, so it is essential that the courts and juries are very clear on what intent actually means, so that they can be confident in correctly finding that it was present on the facts of the case.
Resumo:
I seminariet samlades nordiska experter inom fältet för att diskutera om de aktuella frågorna gällande administrativa sanktioner.
Resumo:
Resumen: En este trabajo se estudia la fi gura del judío como posible inspirador de miedo para la sociedad hispanocristiana medieval, lo que parece estar en íntima relación con la imagen que de él se conformó a lo largo de la Edad Media en los derechos civil y canónico. Al analizar las distintas causas de temor inducidas por los judíos, se distingue entre los factores que causaban miedo físico, que muy probablemente tenían un componente más popular e irracional, aun cuando con frecuencia pudieran ser temores inducidos desde medios intelectuales, y los factores generadores de miedo espiritual, de naturaleza más intelectual y racional.
Resumo:
Resumen: En su obra The morality of law, Lon Fuller pretende indicar ocho principios de la legalidad (principles of legality) que orientan la actividad de la legislación. La legalidad se presenta como un ejemplo de una concepción procedimental o institucional del derecho natural (procedure natural law o institutional natural law). El objeto del “iusnaturalismo institucional” de Fuller no es el contenido ético universal del derecho (derecho natural sustantivo), sino su modo formal-procedimental de existencia (derecho natural institucional). Este artículo tiene cuatro partes. Primero, el proyecto del iusnaturalismo institucional; segundo, los ocho principios de la legalidad de Fuller señalando su presencia también en las obras de Tomás de Aquino, Hobbes y Von Hayek; tercero, algunos conceptos de Wittgenstein y de John Searle que iluminan el aspecto metodológico del iusnaturalismo institucional y cuarto, se apuntará que el proyecto de un iusnaturalismo institucional ya está presente en la reflexión tomista sobre el ius gentium. En la conclusión, se recurrirá a las contribuciones de Jeremy Waldron para establecer el locus del iusnaturalismo institucional en el interior de la tradición iusnaturalista.
Resumo:
O presente trabalho enfoca a possibilidade de uma usucapião de patentes, uma usucapião inclusiva, a incidência da supressio à conduta omissiva do titular, a carnellutiana servidão empresarial e, por último, o usufruto de direitos. Para tanto, foi tangenciada a alteração conceitual dos termos bem, coisa, posse e propriedade de modo a contextualizar significados, estáticos, trazidos desde o direito romano. Contempla a figura da posse de direitos ou da posse como exercício fático de um poder sobre um bem, além do eventual substitutivo de tal requisito usucapiente pelo uso qualificado. Abrange, ainda, uma análise crítica à ausência de disposições normativas específicas sobre a apropriabilidade originária, o que acaba elevando, desproporcionalmente, os poderes do titular da patente. A aquisição originária de bens incorpóreos permite, portanto, acesso igualitário aos bens imateriais, além de estimular o exercício da função social pelo titular. Na hipótese da usucapião inclusiva, atende-se, concomitantemente, ao direito de propriedade e à livre iniciativa e concorrência, disponibilizando opções de produtos no mercado, derivados de players diferentes, advindos da mesma tecnologia interditada.
Resumo:
O presente trabalho pretende apresentar um modelo unificado para o tratamento das estabilidades processuais (coisa julgada e preclusões). Para tanto, parte de duas premissas fundamentais: a segurança como continuidade jurídica, uma forma dinâmica de proteger a estabilidade sem impedir alterações de conteúdo nos atos jurídicos estáveis; e, de outro lado, a concepção das estabilidades processuais como uma cadeia de vínculos em contraditório. A combinação destas premissas resgata o papel da argumentação jurídica no sistema da coisa julgada, retomando a importância da vinculatividade das razões de decidir; e também incorpora ao modelo uma dimensão interprocessual que visa a garantir harmonia e coerência ao tráfego jurídico. Com base nestes pilares, tenta-se propor parâmetros para uma nova compreensão dos limites objetivos e temporais da coisa julgada. No campo dos limites objetivos, destaca-se a elaboração em torno dos esquemas argumentativos, estruturas aglutinadas de elementos processuais referentes ao exercício do contraditório. Em relação aos limites temporais, procura-se elaborar um modelo de revisão das estabilidades que incorpore o novum sem impedir a mudança. Neste contexto, trabalham-se também mecanismos compensatórios para a superação das estabilidades, tais como o ônus argumentativo no procedimento de quebra, e as regras de transição editadas pelo próprio Poder Judiciário.
Resumo:
O presente trabalho apresenta um estudo da tutela jurídica do meio ambiente, especificamente pela utilização do ramo penal. Como a natureza é um bem jurídico importante para a viabilidade da vida dos seres humanos e a perpetuação da espécie, resta clara a relevância da proteção normativa deste valor constitucionalmente protegido. Uma vez previsto na Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988, há uma ordem constitucional para o meio ambiente ser objeto de tutela pelos ramos civil, administrativo e penal. Contudo, a coexistência destas esferas para a mesma finalidade encontra certos problemas de ordem prática e técnica. Depois de uma abordagem histórica, política, social e filosófica da proteção ambiental, a dissertação discorre sobre os diversos âmbitos jurídicos que asseguram a perpetuação do verde para as futuras gerações e sua manutenção para os cidadãos da atualidade. Depois de um estudo sobre os diversos elementos do direito administrativo e civil, o penal é analisado especificamente. Esta abordagem abrange tanto doutrinas nacionais, como internacionais. O estudo de Direito Comparado apresenta todas as formas e possibilidades de proteção ambiental pelo direito penal, verificando sua necessidade, adequação e viabilidade para tanto.
Resumo:
This paper explores the law of accidental mixtures of goods. It traces the development of the English rules on mixture from the seminal nineteenth century case of Spence v Union Marine Insurance Co to the present day, and compares their responses to those given by the Roman law, which always has been claimed as an influence on our jurisprudence in this area. It is argued that the different answers given by English and Roman law to essentially the same problems of title result from the differing bases of these legal systems. Roman a priori theory is contrasted with the more practical reasoning of the common law, and while both sets of rules are judged to be coherent on their own terms, it is suggested that the difference between them is reflective of a more general philosophical disagreement about the proper functioning of a legal system, and the relative importance of theoretical and pragmatic considerations.