PRECLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE RETINAL BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF SIX NOVEL VITAL DYES FOR CHROMOVITRECTOMY

Purpose: To investigate the retinal biocompatibility of six novel vital dyes for chromovitrectomy. Methods: An amount of 0.05 mL of 0.5% and 0.05% light green (LG), fast green (FG), Evans blue (EB), brilliant blue (BriB), bromophenol blue (BroB), or indigo carmine (IC) was injected intravitreally in the right eye, whereas in the left eye balanced salt solution was applied for control in rabbits` eyes. Clinical examination, fluorescein angiography, histology with light microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy were performed after 1 and 7 days. Retinal cell layers were evaluated for morphologic alterations and number of cells. The electroretinographic changes were assessed at baseline, 24 hours and 7 days. Results: Fluorescein angiography disclosed hypofluorescent spots only in the 0.5% EB group. Light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy disclosed slight focal morphologic changes in eyes exposed to 0.05% IC, FG, BriB, similar to the control at 1 and 7 days. In the lower dose groups, EB, LG, and BroB caused substantial retinal alterations by light microscopy. At the higher dose, BroB and EB produced diffuse cellular edema and vacuolization within the ganglion cells, bipolar cells, and photoreceptors. FG and IC at 0.5% caused slight retinal alterations similar to balanced salt solution injection. LG at 0.5% caused diffuse vacuolization of bipolar cells after 1 and 7 days. Injection of 0.5% EB caused a significant decrease in neuroretinal cell counts in comparison to control eyes in the 7-day examination (P < 0.05). Electroretinography revealed intermittent prolonged latency and decreased amplitude in eyes injected with 0.5% EB, LG, BriB, and BroB, while at the lower dose, only LG and EB induced few functional changes. Conclusion: The progressive order of retinal biocompatibility, from safest to most toxic, was IC, FG, BriB, BroB, LG, EB.

Feasibility of an evidence-based literature search service for general practitioners

Objective: To test the feasibility of an evidence-based clinical literature search service to help answer general practitioners' (GPs') clinical questions. Design: Two search services supplied GPs who submitted questions with the best available empirical evidence to answer these questions. The GPs provided feedback on the value of the service, and concordance of answers from the two search services was assessed. Setting: Two literature search services (Queensland and Victoria), operating for nine months from February 1999. Main outcome measures: Use of the service; time taken to locate answers; availability of evidence; value of the service to GPs; and consistency of answers from the two services. Results: 58 GPs asked 160 questions (29 asked one, 11 asked five or more). The questions concerned treatment (65%), aetiology (17%), prognosis (13%), and diagnosis (5%). Answering a question took a mean of 3 hours 32 minutes of personnel time (95% Cl, 2.67-3.97); nine questions took longer than 10 hours each to answer, the longest taking 23 hours 30 minutes. Evidence of suitable quality to provide a sound answer was available for 126 (79%) questions. Feedback data for 84 (53%) questions, provided by 42 GPs, showed that they appreciated the service, and asking the questions changed clinical care. There were many minor differences between the answers from the two centres, and substantial differences in the evidence found for 4/14 questions. However, conclusions reached were largely similar, with no or only minor differences for all questions. Conclusions: It is feasible to provide a literature search service, but further assessment is needed to establish its cost effectiveness.

Saturable dose-response relationships for melphalan in melanoma treatment by isolated limb infusion in the nude rat

Nude rats bearing melanomas on their hindlimbs were treated by isolated limb infusion (ILI) with increasing doses (7.5-400 mug/ml) of melphalan. The response of tumours to treatment at the end of the observation period was graded, according to diameter, as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), no change (NC) or progressive disease (PD). No linear relationship between the dose of melphalan and the tumour response was observed. All doses above a threshold of 15 mug/ml achieved a PR or CR. The achievement of CR was not related to increased dose. Two major implications arise from this work. Firstly, the typically two-to three-fold increase in cytotoxic drug concentration given in high dose chemotherapy compared with standard drug concentration may not be sufficient to produce the expected increase in tumour response and possibly survival, and the controversial results of high dose chemotherapy in different studies may thus be explained. Secondly, since an increase in melphalan dose above a certain threshold does not greatly increase tumour response, the use of combination therapies would seem to be more likely to be effective than increased chemotherapeutic drug doses in achieving better tumour responses.

Automated edge-detection technique for measurement of brachial artery reactivity: A comparison of concordance with manual measurements

Concerns have been raised about the reproducibility of brachial artery reactivity (BAR), because subjective decisions regarding the location of interfaces may influence the measurement of very small changes in lumen diameter. We studied 120 consecutive patients with BAR to address if an automated technique could be applied, and if experience influenced reproducibility between two observers, one experienced and one inexperienced. Digital cineloops were measured automatically, using software that measures the leading edge of the endothelium and tracks this in sequential frames and also manually, where a set of three point-to-point measurements were averaged. There was a high correlation between automated and manual techniques for both observers, although less variability was present with expert readers. The limits of agreement overall for interobserver concordance were 0.13 +/-0.65 mm for the manual and 0.03 +/-0.74 mm for the automated measurement. For intraobserver concordance, the limits of agreement were -0.07 +/-0.38 mm for observer 1 and -0.16 +/-0.55 mm for observer 2. We concluded that BAR measurements were highly concordant between observers, although more concordant using the automated method, and that experience does affect concordance. Care must be taken to ensure that the same segments are measured between observers and serially.