Influence of microphysical schemes on atmospheric water in the Weather Research and Forecasting model

This study examines how different microphysical parameterization schemes influence orographically induced precipitation and the distributions of hydrometeors and water vapour for midlatitude summer conditions in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. A high-resolution two-dimensional idealized simulation is used to assess the differences between the schemes in which a moist air flow is interacting with a bell-shaped 2 km high mountain. Periodic lateral boundary conditions are chosen to recirculate atmospheric water in the domain. It is found that the 13 selected microphysical schemes conserve the water in the model domain. The gain or loss of water is less than 0.81% over a simulation time interval of 61 days. The differences of the microphysical schemes in terms of the distributions of water vapour, hydrometeors and accumulated precipitation are presented and discussed. The Kessler scheme, the only scheme without ice-phase processes, shows final values of cloud liquid water 14 times greater than the other schemes. The differences among the other schemes are not as extreme, but still they differ up to 79% in water vapour, up to 10 times in hydrometeors and up to 64% in accumulated precipitation at the end of the simulation. The microphysical schemes also differ in the surface evaporation rate. The WRF single-moment 3-class scheme has the highest surface evaporation rate compensated by the highest precipitation rate. The different distributions of hydrometeors and water vapour of the microphysical schemes induce differences up to 49 W m−2 in the downwelling shortwave radiation and up to 33 W m−2 in the downwelling longwave radiation.

UNESCO World Heritage „Prehistoric pile-dwellings around the Alps“: Chances and Challenges for Management and Research of Cultural Heritage Under Water

Research in prehistoric sites of lakes and bogs around the Alps started more than 150 years ago. In 2004 Switzerland took the initiative to propose an international UNESCO world heritage nomination, which was successful in 2011. Six countries – Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland – joined forces to obtain the precious label for an invisible cultural heritage of outstanding universal value. Archaeological sites under water or in bogs are of special importance because objects made of organic material like wood, bark, plant fibres and others survive in this milieu for hundred or thousands of years. The alpine pile-dwelling sites offer a highly precise dating possibility by using dendrochronology. All in all these sites have a high scientific potential but run also risks of long term conservation. Beside the scientific chances there are risks to consider: public access is difficult and a major challenge. New ideas are demanded to keep alive public interest.

Zooplankton and chlorophyll in upper water layers within research polygons in the Atlantic Ocean, June-September 2001

During Cruise 46 of R/V Akademik Mstislav Keldysh (from June to September 2001), vertical distributions of Radiolaria (Acantharia - Bac and Euradiolaria - Beur), mesozooplankton (from 0.2 to 3.0 mm size, Bm), and chlorophyll a (Cchl) in the epipelagic zone of the North Atlantic were studied. To examine the above-listed characteristics, samples were taken by Niskin 30 l bottles from 12-16 depth levels within the upper 100 to 200 m layer in the subarctic (48°11'N, 16°06'W) and subtropical (27°31'N, 75°51'W) waters, as well as in the transitional zone (41°44'N, 49°57'W). The latter proved to be characterized by the highest values of all averaged parameters examined by us within the upper 100 m layer (Bm - 365mg/m**3, Bac - 140 mg/m**3, Beur - 0.37 mg/m**3, and Cchl - 0.32 mg/m**3). For subarctic and subtropical waters corresponding characteristics were as follows: Bm - 123 and 53 mg/m**3, Bac - 0 and 0.06 mg/m**3, Beur - 0.17 and 0.19 mg/m**3, and Cchl - 0.27 and 0.05 mg/m**3, respectively. Percentage of Acantharia in total biomass of Radiolaria and zooplankton ranged from 0 to 39%, whereas that of Euradiolaria varied from 0.01 to 0.36%. Depth levels with maximum abundance of Acantharia were located above maxima of zooplankton and chlorophyll a or coincided with them. As for Euradiolaria, vertical profiles of their biomass were more diverse as compared with Acantharia. The latter group preferred more illuminated depth levels for its maximum development (10-100% of surface irradiance, E0) with respect to Euradiolaria (1-60% of E0). Possible reasons for this difference are discussed.