936 resultados para Implant Placement
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE Short implants are increasingly used, but there is doubt about their performance being similar to that of regular implants. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical stability of short implants vs. regular implants placed in the edentulous posterior mandible. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-three patients received a total of 48 short implants (5 × 5.5 mm and 5 × 7 mm) and 42 regular implants (4 × 10 mm and 4 × 11.5 mm) in the posterior mandible. Patients who received short implants had <10 mm of bone height measured from the bone crest to the outer wall of the mandibular canal. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed at time intervals T0 (immediately after implant placement), T1 (after 15 days), T2 (after 30 days), T3 (after 60 days), and T4 (after 90 days). RESULTS The survival rate after 90 days was 87.5% for the short implants and 100% for regular implants (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the implants in time intervals T1, T2, T3, and T4. In T0, the RFA values of 5 × 5.5 implants were higher than values of 5 × 7 and 4 × 11.5 implants (P < 0.05). A total of six short implants that were placed in four patients were lost (three of 5 × 5.5 mm and three of 5 × 7 mm). Three lost implants started with high ISQ values, which progressively decreased. The other three lost implants started with a slightly lower ISQ value, which rose and then began to fall. CONCLUSIONS Survival rate of short implants after 90 days was lower than that of regular implants. However, short implants may be considered a reasonable alternative for rehabilitation of severely resorbed mandibles with reduced height, to avoid performing bone reconstruction before implant placement. Patients need to be aware of the reduced survival rate compared with regular implants before implant placement to avoid disappointments.
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of Straumann Bone Level SLActive implants in various clinical situations in daily dental practice for up to 3 years. METHOD AND MATERIALS This was a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study in which implants were placed within approved indications in any situation deemed suitable by the treating clinician. No implant placement or loading protocol was specified, and implants were placed according to the routine treatment protocols at each participating center. RESULTS In this analysis, data were available from 342 implants in 233 patients in three countries (USA, Canada, and Switzerland). One or two implants were placed in the majority of patients (70.8% and 19.3%, respectively), mostly in the maxilla (71.3%); almost half (47.7%) were placed in the esthetic zone. Implant placement after 4 to > 16 weeks of healing was preferred in Switzerland (92.0%), while 42.0% of implants were placed immediately in the USA and Canada. A flapless procedure was performed in 25.2% of cases in the USA and Canada, compared to 0.5% in Switzerland. Cumulative implant survival and success rates after 3 years were 97.5% and 93.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION Straumann Bone Level Implants can achieve favorable outcomes and high survival rates after 3 years in daily dental practice. The survival and success rates were comparable with those achieved in formal controlled clinical trials.
Resumo:
A 10-yr-old female Asian small-clawed otter (Aonyx cinerea) presented with a history of right forelimb lameness. Antebrachial radiographs revealed a Monteggia lesion, classified by cranial radial head luxation and distal diaphyseal ulnar fracture. Open reduction with placement of an ulnar-radial positional screw was performed. The lateral collateral ligament was reconstructed using suture anchored by a condylar screw and bone tunnel in the radius. Reduction and proper implant placement was confirmed on postoperative radiographs. The ulnar-radial positional screw was removed 6 wk postoperatively to allow proper supination and pronation. Limb function was greatly improved at this time; however, a mild lameness was still observed. At 7 mo postoperatively, the otter was ambulating lameness-free. Radiographs documented proper joint reduction and stable condylar screw. At 32 mo postoperatively, the otter continued to exhibit normal ambulation.
Resumo:
OBJECTIVES To assess a selection of host-derived biomarkers in peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) from adjacent teeth 10 years following implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS Peri-implant sulcus fluid and GCF samples obtained from the deepest sites of 504 implants and 493 adjacent teeth were analysed for levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3, MMP-8, MMP-1, and MMP-1 bound to tissue inhibitor of MMP (TIMP)-1 (MMP-1/TIMP-1) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. RESULTS Overall, MMP-8 was detected in 90% of the sites. In more than 50% of the sites, IL-1β was identified while in 30% of the sites MMP-1, MMP-1/TIMP-1 and MMP-3 were found over the detection level. Increased biomarkers levels from PISF and GCF were positively correlated (r = 0.375-0.702; P < 0.001). However, no qualitative and quantitative differences were found between PISF and GCF. The levels of MMP-1 were negatively correlated with those of MMP-1/TIMP-1 at implants (r = -0.644; P < 0.001). Median MMP-1 levels at implants were high (5.17 pg/site) in subjects with severe chronic periodontitis and low in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic periodontitis (0 pg/site; P = 0.026) or gingivitis (0 pg/site; P = 0.034). Levels of IL-1β were found to be different in GCF according to the periodontal conditions (P = 0.001) with the highest level found in mild-to-moderate periodontitis (6.2 pg/site). Clinical attachment levels at implants demonstrated an inverse correlation with MMP-1/TIMP-1 (r = -0.147; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Increased levels of MMP-8 and IL-1β in PISF or GCF may be associated with inflammation around teeth and implants while lower levels of MMP-1/TIMP-1 may be an indicator of disease progression around implants.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND Little information is yet available on zirconia-based prostheses supported by implants. PURPOSE To evaluate technical problems and failures of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses with exclusive screw-retention. MATERIAL AND METHODS Consecutive patients received screw-retained zirconia-based prostheses supported by implants and were followed over a time period of 5 years. The implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation were performed in one clinical setting, and all patients participated in the maintenance program. The treatment comprised single crowns (SCs) and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) of three to 12 units. Screw-retention of the CAD/CAM-fabricated SCs and FDPs was performed with direct connection at the implant level. The primary outcome was the complete failure of zirconia-based prostheses; outcome measures were fracture of the framework or extensive chipping resulting in the need for refabrication. A life table analysis was performed, the cumulative survival rate (CSR) calculated, and a Kaplan-Meier curve drawn. RESULTS Two hundred and ninety-four implants supported 156 zirconia-based prostheses in 95 patients (52 men, 43 women, average age 59.1 ± 11.7 years). Sixty-five SCs and 91 FDPs were identified, comprising a total of 441 units. Fractures of the zirconia framework and extensive chipping resulted in refabrication of nine prostheses. Nearly all the prostheses (94.2%) remained in situ during the observation period. The 5-year CSR was 90.5%, and 41 prostheses (14 SCs, 27 FDPs) comprising 113 units survived for an observation time of more than 5 years. Six SCs exhibited screw loosening, and polishing of minor chipping was required for five prostheses. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that zirconia-based implant-supported fixed prostheses exhibit satisfactory treatment outcomes and that screw-retention directly at the implant level is feasible.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare the 5-year survival and success rates of 3.3 mm dental implants either made from titanium-zirconium (TiZr) alloy or from Grade IV titanium (Ti Grade IV) in mandibular implant-based removable overdentures. METHODS The core study had a follow-up period of 36 months and was designed as a randomized, controlled, double-blind, split-mouth multicenter clinical trial. Patients with edentulous mandibles received two Straumann Bone Level implants (diameter 3.3 mm, SLActive®), one of TiZr (test) and one of Ti Grade IV (control), in the interforaminal region. This follow-up study recruited patients from the core study and evaluated the plaque and sulcus bleeding indices, radiographic crestal bone level, as well as implant survival and success 60 months after implant placement. RESULTS Of the 91 patients who initially received implants, 75 completed the 36 month follow-up and 49 were available for the 60 month examination. Two patients were excluded so that a total of 47 patients with an average age of 72 ± 8 years were analysed. The characteristics and 36-month performance of the present study cohort did not differ from the non-included initial participants (p > 0.05). In the period since the 36-month follow-up examination, no implant was lost. The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.9 % for the TiZr group and 97.8 % for the Ti Grade IV group. Crestal bone level changes at 60 months were not different in the test and control group (TiZr -0.60 ± 0.69 mm and Ti Grade IV -0.61 ± 0.83 mm; p = 0.96). The cumulative implant success rate after 60 months was 95.8 and 92.6 % for TiZr and Ti Grade IV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS After 60 months, the positive outcomes of the 36 month results for TiZr and Ti Grade IV implants were confirmed, with no significant differences with regard to crestal bone level change, clinical parameters and survival or success rates. TiZr implants performed equally well compared to conventional Ti Grade IV 3.3 mm diameter-reduced implants for mandibular removable overdentures. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01878331.
Resumo:
This prospective observational cohort study investigated whether diabetic dental patients with poor glycemic control experience a higher risk of post-operative complications and diminished wound healing abilities after an oral surgical procedure such as implant placement. This study compared soft tissue oral wound healing complications between poorly controlled diabetic patients, well controlled diabetic patients and non-diabetic patients following surgical implant placement in the mandible with a total of 131 patients. A one week post-surgical follow-up visit involved an oral wound examination that consisted of evaluating for edema, erythema, exudate, oral pain, problems with flap closure, infection, and hematoma. Analyses were performed to determine significance differences in frequency of oral wound complications between the 3 diabetic groups. Two-by-two contingency tables using chi-square analysis were used to evaluate for significant differences in the proportion of each post-operative oral wound healing complication. This was done separately between non-diabetics and diabetics and between well-controlled and poorly controlled diabetics to calculate odds ratios. Confidence intervals were also calculated. This preliminary study showed that many of the complications were found not to be associated with diabetic status. Other complications such as edema and problems with flap closure were found to be less likely to occur in diabetics compared to non-diabetics and even in poorly controlled diabetics when compared to well-controlled diabetics. The results did not support the hypothesis that diabetic dental patients experience a higher risk than non-diabetic patients of post-operative soft tissue oral wound complications.^
Resumo:
Introdução: A reabilitação com implantes nas últimas décadas tem evoluído tendo em vista a obtenção de melhores resultados ao nível mecânico/funcional, mas também a nível estético. A relação coronal dos implantes com crista óssea é um dos pontos que tem sido estudado. Objectivo: Realizar uma revisão sobre a relação coronal dos implantes com a crista óssea, com objectivo de responder à seguinte questão “A posição sub-crestal dos implantes em relação à crista óssea é vantajosa?”. Para tal vão ser estudados alguns dos factores que podem influenciar esta decisão. Metodologia: Realizou-se pesquisa bibliográfica recorrendo às bases de dados da “MEDLINE/Pubmed”, “SciELO”, “Science Direct”, “B-on”, “Google Academic” e repositórios de várias universidades portuguesas e estrangeiras, com as palavras-chave: “Bone Cells” ”Bone remodeling”, “Bone Crest”, “Osseointegration”, “Implant Placement”, “Biologic Width” e “Platform Switching”,”Implant Placement Depth” e “Morse Cone”, tendo sido estas associadas entre si. Também foi realizada pesquisa manual em livros dos vários temas estudados. Conclusão: A colocação de implantes ao nível sub-crestal ainda apresenta alguma controvérsia, mas obedecendo a alguns factores, como a utilização de um implante e pilar específicos, pode tornar- se algo muito vantajoso numa perspectiva futura.
Resumo:
Introduction - After tooth extraction, the alveolar bone undergoes a remodeling process, wich leads to horizontal and vertical bone loss. These resorption processes complicate dental rehabilitation, particularly in connection with implants. Various methods of guided bone regeneration have been described to retain the original dimension of the bone after extraction. Most procedures use filler materials and membranes to support the buccal plate and soft tissue, to stabilize the coagulum and to prevent epithelial ingrowth. It has also been suggested that resorption of the buccal bundle bone can be avoided by leaving a buccal root segment (socket-shield technique) in place, because the biological integrity of the buccal periodontum remains untouched. This method has also been decribed in connection with immediate implant placement. Objective - This literature review aim enumerate and describe the different treatments and tissue reactions after tooth extraction, immediate and delayed implantation. The socketshield technique, the evolution in tooth extraction and immediate implantation with high esthetic results due to the preservation of hard and soft tissues by leaving a buccal root segment in place. Materials and methods - For this purpose a research has been done and data was obtained from on-line resources: Medline, Pubmed, Scielo, Bireme, Bon, books and specialized magazines which was conducted between January 2016 and May 2016. A number of articles have been obtained in English and French ,published between 1997 and 2015 . The key words used were implantology, dental implant, hard/soft tissue, tooth extraction, immediate implantation, delayed implantation, socket-shield. Conclusion - In socket-shield technique, there were neither functional nor aesthetic changes in soft and hard tissues. It’s already a routine practice in the arsenal of highaesthetic immediate implantology and should be used when indicated. Although this technique is quiet promising, we should be aware of the incoming publications about a larger follow up and the predictability of leaving a fragment inside the socket after an extraction.
Resumo:
A técnica de Regeneração Óssea Guiada (ROG) é um procedimento que tem por objetivo a reposição do volume ósseo da crista alveolar necessário para garantir o sucesso da reabilitação oral recorrendo a implantes, repondo tanto a componente estética como funcional. Este trabalho foca apenas a ROG horizontal prévia à colocação de implantes e analisa o sucesso e a previsibilidade clínica deste procedimento de aumento ósseo, o sucesso e a sobrevivência de implantes colocados em osso regenerado bem como alguns tipos de enxertos ósseos e membranas. Metodologicamente consiste numa revisão de literatura, baseando-se numa pesquisa de artigos em bases de dados on-line e recorrendo também à consulta de livros em formato digital. As palavras-chave utilizadas na pesquisa on-line foram: “bone healing” AND “tooth extraction”, “bone resoption” AND “tooth extraction”, “bone regeneration” AND “dental implants”, “horizontal guided bone regeneration”, “horizontal guided bone regeneration” AND “dental implants”, “horizontal bone augmentation” “horizontal bone augmentation” AND “dental implants”, “lateral bone augmentation” AND “dental implants”, “horizontal ridge augmentation” AND “dental implants”. A regeneração óssea guiada manifesta comprovado sucesso e previsibilidade no aumento ósseo e os implantes colocados em osso regenerado demonstram sucesso a longo-prazo.
Resumo:
Introdução: A posição da colocação do implante relativamente à crista óssea tem sido discutida na comunidade científica como fator influenciador de sucesso ou insucesso. Por outro lado a perda ou preservação óssea está intrinsecamente relacionado com fatores como a seleção do sistema de implante, o tipo de implante e a sua conexão. Objetivo: Este trabalho teve como objetivo a análise da bibliografia existente que compara a colocação de implantes a nível da crista óssea (justa cristal) com a colocação de implantes abaixo da crista óssea (sub-cristal) em sinergismo com outros fatores, de forma que seja percecionada a eficácia e sucesso na seleção efetuada. Metodologia: Procedeu-se a uma pesquisa bibliográfica através da identificação de artigos publicados em bases de dados eletrónicas internacionais, PubMed, B-on e Science Direct utilizando palavras-chave e critérios de exclusão e inclusão, que permitiram fazer uma seleção prévia dos artigos a incluir ao longo deste trabalho. Resultados: Após a realização da pesquisa bibliográfica obtiveram-se 63 artigos. A partir da amostra encontrada foram excluídos 26 artigos devido à falta de correspondência do seu conteúdo ao tema proposto e 14 por se encontrarem repetidos ou sem dados comparativos. Nos 23 artigos aceites encontram-se incluídos estudos animais, elementos finitos, revisões e estudos clínicos. Conclusão: Os resultados sugerem que a colocação de implantes em sub-cristal apresenta-se como uma melhor solução na preservação da crista óssea, no entanto há que levar em conta outros fatores associados diretamente ao implante, nomeadamente, a geometria, superfície não polida do colo assim como o tipo de conexão do pilar ao implante, onde foi encontrada uma relativa evidência de melhor eficácia no que respeita à conexão do tipo “cone Morse”.
Resumo:
Os fármacos anti-reabsorção óssea mais utilizados atualmente são os bifosfonatos que são medicamentos que inibem a actividade osteoclástica. O mecanismo de ação destes fármacos consiste na redução da reabsorção óssea pois inibem a apoptose dos osteoclastos e promovem a inibição da angiogénese. Estes fármacos são utilizados no tratamento de doenças como a osteoporose, hipercalcemia, doença de Paget e em pacientes oncológicos com metástases ósseas de tumores sólidos e mieloma múltiplo. Por outro lado, estes fármacos além de todos os benefícios que têm para os pacientes nestas condições, podem ter como complicação a osteonecrose dos maxilares (ONM). A ONM é uma complicação oral grave caracterizada, na maioria, por uma osteomielite inicial que normalmente evolui para uma exposição de osso necrosado acompanhada por dor na maxila ou na mandíbula. Nos doentes oncológicos têm sido diagnosticados vários casos de necrose óssea mais frequentemente na mandíbula. Esta patologia (ONM) apesar de ter baixa incidência e do seu aparecimento ser relativamente recente, levou à introdução de algumas recomendações internacionais para o uso de bifosfonatos, principalmente em pacientes oncológicos. Para a execução deste trabalho recorri a fontes de pesquisas como as bases de dados como a PubMed, B-On e, também ao Repositório Institucional da Universidade Fernando Pessoa das quais resultaram 198 artigos e duas monografias realizadas por exalunos da Universidade Fernando Pessoa. Com a realização deste trabalho foi possível esclarecer algumas dúvidas acerca dos efeitos que os fármacos anti-reabsorção óssea têm no organismo e mais especificamente na cavidade oral, de forma a estar consciente dos riscos que estes pacientes correm, caso lhes sejam realizados procedimentos como é o caso, das exodontias ou da colocação de implantes.
Resumo:
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify retrospectively the predictors of implant survival when the flapless protocol was used in two private dental practices. Materials and Methods: The collected data were initially computer searched to identify the patients; later, a hand search of patient records was carried out to identify all flapless implants consecutively inserted over the last 10 years. The demographic information gathered on statistical predictors included age, sex, periodontal and peri-implantitis status, smoking, details of implants inserted, implant locations, placement time after extraction, use of simultaneous guided hard and soft tissue regeneration procedures, loading protocols, type of prosthesis, and treatment outcomes (implant survival and complications). Excluded were any implants that required flaps or simultaneous guided hard and soft tissue regeneration procedures, and implants narrower than 3.25 mm. Results: A total of 1,241 implants had been placed in 472 patients. Life table analysis indicated cumulative 5-year and 10-year implant survival rates of 97.9% and 96.5%, respectively. Most of the failed implants occurred in the posterior maxilla (54%) in type 4 bone (74.0%), and 55.0% of failed implants had been placed in smokers. Conclusion: Flapless dental implant surgery can yield an implant survival rate comparable to that reported in other studies using traditional flap techniques.
Resumo:
This case report details the successful rehabilitation of an edentulous patient using a complete upper prosthesis and a lower implant retained overdenture. The provision of care was split between a specialist centre and a primary care setting. This approach reduced inconvenience to the patient. Modern surgical and prosthodontic techniques also reduced the total delivery time. After initial consultation a new set of complete dentures was prescribed with changes in design to the originals. The patient was also planned for placement of two mandibular implants to stabilise and retain the mandibular denture. The first line of treatment involved provision of a new set of dentures constructed by the patient's general dental practitioner. Dental implants were then placed in a specialist centre and the patient returned to the dental practice for attachment of the lower denture to the dental implants. The benefits and success of mandibular implant retained dentures are well documented. With delivery of the overdenture, the patient reported increased satisfaction with his prostheses which allowed him to eat a greater range of foods and enabled him to feel confident when speaking and socialising.
Resumo:
We examine the efficacy two volume spatial registration of pre and postoperative clinical computed tomography (CT) imaging to verify post-operative electrode array placement in cochlear implant (CI) patients. To measure the degree of accuracy with which the composite image predicts in-vivo placement of the array, we replicate the CI surgical process in cadaver heads. Pre-operative, post-operative, micro CT imaging and histology are utilized for verification.