UPGRADING THE GLEASON SCORE IN EXTENDED PROSTATE BIOPSY: IMPLICATIONS FOR TREATMENT CHOICE

Purpose: To determine the incidence of overestimation of Gleason score (GS) in extended prostate biopsy, and consequently circumventing unnecessary aggressive treatment. Methods and Materials: This is a retrospective study of 464 patients who underwent prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy between January 2001 and November 2007. The GS from biopsy and radical prostatectomy were compared. The incidence of overestimation of GS in biopsies and tumor volume were studied. Multivariate analysis was applied to find parameters that predict upgrading the GS in prostate biopsy. Results: The exact agreement of GS between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy occurred in 56.9% of cases. In 29.1% cases it was underestimated, and it was overestimated in 14%. One hundred and six (22.8%) patients received a diagnosis of high GS (8, 9, or 10) in a prostate biopsy. In 29.2% of cases, the definitive Gleason Score was 7 or lower. In cases in which GS was overestimated in the biopsy, tumors were significantly smaller. In multivariate analysis, the total percentage of tumor was the only independent factor in overestimation of GS. Tumors occupying less than 33% of cores had a 5.6-fold greater chance of being overestimated. Conclusion: In the extended biopsy era and after the International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on G, almost one third of tumors considered to have high GS at the biopsy may be intermediate-risk cancers. In that condition, tumors are smaller in biopsy. This should be remembered by professionals involved with prostate cancer to avoid overtreatment and undesirable side effects. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc.

Abnormal Methylation of Histone Deacetylase Genes: Implications on Etiology and Epigenetic Therapy of Astrocytomas

Background: A growing body of evidence has revealed, the involvement of epigenetic alterations in the etiology of astrocytomas. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the association of DNA methylation of histone deacetylase genes (HDAC) with the etiology of astrocytoma, and the implications for epigenetic therapy. Materials and Methods: Methylation of the HDAC4, HDAC5 and HDAC6 genes was assessed in 29 tumor samples (astrocytomas grades I, III, and IV) and in the glioblastoma cell lines U87, U251, U343, SF188, and T98G by methylation-specific quantitative PCR (MSED-qPCR). Results: Significantly increased methylation of the HDAC5 gene was observed in astrocytomas when compared to non-neoplastic brain samples (p=0.0007) and to glioblastomas cell lines (p=0.001). A heterogenic methylation pattern was evidenced when compared to the glioblastoma cell lines. Distinct effects on methylation and gene expression were observed after in vitro treatment of the different cell lines with decitabine. Conclusion: Our results suggest that abnormal methylation of HDAC genes is involved in the etiology of astrocytomas and indicate that loci-specific epigenetic interindividualities might be associated to the differential responses to treatment with decitabine.