Afrolatinidad y globalización : perspectiva étnica de la globalización. Estudio de caso : Proyecto Minero Mande Norte entre los municipios colombianos del Carmen del Darien y Murindó

El fenómeno de la globalización es una realidad que caracteriza la política internacional mundial que hace referencia principalmente a los procesos económicos, y a las innovaciones tecnológicas, sociales y culturales que están transformando nuestra manera de percibir e interpretar el mundo. En Colombia se han dado cambios muy importantes para el reconocimiento de los derechos de los grupos afrocolombianos. Uno de los cambios importantes, es el derecho de las comunidades afrocolombianas en cuanto a su desarrollo social, cultural y económico. Dentro del contexto nacional, el Pacifico colombiano es un territorio caracterizado por ser un polo de desarrollo, una región reconocida por su riqueza biológica y cultural, donde se realizan grandes proyectos de desarrollo y de extracción de recursos naturales. Pero estos proyectos tiene una alta incidencia en la pérdida de control de las comunidades sobre su territorio e incluso sobre su propio destino. La Muriel Minning Company es una multinacional de los Estados Unidos que actualmente desarrolla el Mega proyecto minero "Mandé Norte"; el gobierno colombiano le otorgó nueve títulos mineros para explotar y comercializar las reservas de cobre y los subproductos de oro y molibdeno. Colombia, como muchos otros países del sur, esta siendo fuertemente afectada en términos de diversidad cultural, construcción de sociedades sustentables y preservación del medio ambiente, por la intervención que en nuestros territorios hacen las multinacionales a través de megaproyectos, que sólo están generando pobreza, perdida de la diversidad cultural y biológica, deterioro de las condiciones ambientales sustentables, desplazamiento forzado.

Artículo de reflexión crítica: El procedimiento administrativo colombiano de solicitud de concesiones portuarias marítimas en ejercicio del derecho de petición en interés particular

En Colombia, la construcción, operación y administración de los puertos exige el otorgamiento, por parte del Estado, de un contrato de concesión a sociedades portuarias, el cual se otorga previo agotamiento de un trámite administrativo especial de iniciativa privada, mediante el ejercicio del derecho de petición en interés particular o por medio de una oferta oficiosa impulsada por el Estado. Los trámites enunciados están previstos en la Ley 1ª de 1991, reglamentada actualmente por el Decreto 4735 de 2009. Si bien el régimen legal prevé mecanismos que permiten la comparecencia de terceros dentro del trámite, no contempla la manera como debe tramitarse la solicitud de concesión portuaria, radicada por fuera del término previsto en el artículo 10 de la Ley 1ª de 1991, cuando ésta no es una oposición o propuesta alternativa a una solicitud, sobre una misma área en estudio de petición de concesión.

Curriculum Innovation Network Conference - 18th & 19th January 2011

Presentations from the Curriculum Innovation Network Conference that took place on 18th & 19th January 2011 at the University of Southampton. The ambition was to bring together a global network of universities who are engaged in institution-wide curriculum innovation. The focus of the network is to share learning and practice in a collaborative way, to identify best practice and to explore practical solutions to the challenges we face. Keynote speakers from across the world and colleagues from leading universities came together to share their experience on approaches to transforming their curricula and the overall learning experience of their students. The challenges of doing this are significant, and there is much that we can learn from each other as we seek to transform the learning environment of our institutions. We hope that all who attend found these two days of great value in starting and enhancing a global dialogue about education transformation. Additional presentations will be uploaded in due course. Please note the copy right of these presentations remains with the author.

El procedimiento administrativo especial colombiano de solicitud de concesiones portuarias marítimas en ejercicio del derecho de petición en interés particular

En Colombia, la construcción, operación y administración de los puertos, exige el otorgamiento por parte del Estado, de una concesión portuaria a sociedades portuarias, la cual se concede previo el agotamiento de un trámite administrativo especial de iniciativa privada, mediante el ejercicio del derecho de petición en interés particular, o por medio de una oferta oficiosa impulsada por el Estado. Los trámites enunciados están previstos en la Ley 1ª de 10 de enero de 1991 y en el Decreto 4735 de 2 de diciembre de 2009. Si bien, el régimen legal prevé mecanismos que permiten la comparecencia de terceros dentro del trámite, no contempla la manera como debe tramitarse la solicitud de concesión portuaria, radicada por fuera del término previsto en el artículo 10 de la Ley 1ª de 1991, sin que constituya una oposición o propuesta alternativa a una solicitud, sobre una misma área en estudio de petición de concesión.

Conscientious objection and ideological impositions: The Drift of The Mayflower

This article discusses the problematic and evading development of conscientiousobjection in the context of the Colombian constitutional jurisprudence. From a historical allusion to the famous case of the “Mayflower Pilgrims” –which serve as areference to the central problems that faces the objector–, it seeks to define the scopeof conscientious objection as a fundamental right (as a fundamental justice claim)in regard to the “factual” and “legal” possibilities for its exercise, for which there willbe a brief contrast between the most representative cases decided by the ColombianConstitutional Court in such matter. The core of the article is the idea that thereis an ideological prevalence that, unjustifiably, makes it difficult and in some casesdenies the exercise of the right to object in consciousness, particularly when it comes tothe right of life in regard to the abortion case.

Diferencias entre la regla de exclusión probatoria nacional y la regla de exclusión del Derecho Internacional Penal: análisis de tres casos de injerencias en comunicaciones privadas.

Teniendo en cuenta tres casos dentro del contexto del conflicto armado donde la jurisdicción penal colombiana estudia la admisión o exclusión de medios probatorios producidos a partir de injerencias de comunicaciones, encontramos que no siempre se aplica la regla de exclusión cuando no cuentan con una orden judicial previa. Ante este problema, buscamos como se ha solucionado, teniendo como referente la el Derecho Internacional Humanitario, el Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos. Lo anterior nos da base para entender la regla de exclusión de que se ha venido desarrollando dentro del Derecho Internacional Penal. Si bien estas reglas nos sirven para solucionar estos tres casos, terminan siendo contradictorios a lo que ha venido desarrollando la Corte Constitucional. De esta manera, si bien esta Corte consideró que la regla de Estatuto de Roma, va en concordancia con la nuestra regla de exclusión nacional, tal afirmación es errónea.

Ensino jurídico e cidadania : uma investigação acerca do PRAJUR (Núcleo de Prática Jurídica) das faculdades integradas de PATOS (FIP)

Esta dissertação aborda o tema do ensino jurídico e cidadania e da função social do Núcleo de Prática Jurídica(PRAJUR) da FIP-Faculdades Integradas de Patos-PB. Para analisar o ensino jurídico e cidadania do PRAJUR/FIP, parte-se da Resolução nº 09/2004/MEC que sucedeu a Portaria nº 1.886/94/MEC, onde instituiu a implantação de escritórios jurídicos em todos os cursos de Direito, na busca de melhor delinear o conhecimento prático dos acadêmicos. Os objetivos da pesquisa foram: descrever que através do conhecimento tem-se uma forma de diminuir a distância entre os níveis sociais e um caminho à buscar cidadania pela educação, refletir sobre o acesso à justiça como um direito de cidadania e analisar a função social do PRAJUR/FIP no acesso à justiça. A coleta dos dados foi realizada através de bibliografia, doutrina, dados documentais e aplicação de questionários. A dissertação foi organizada de forma a contemplar educação jurídica e efeitos práticos no exercício da cidadania onde no primeiro capítulo discorre-se sobre a educação e suas transversalidades aplicáveis atualmente na sociedade. No segundo capítulo abordou-se além da função social do PRAJUR/FIP no acesso à justiça, apresenta-se os dados coletados junto aos educadores em forma de entrevista do PRAJUR/FIP, e em forma de pesquisa dados coletados de exalunos e usuário. Finalmente, no terceiro capítulos aborda-se a evolução dos cursos de Direito e a formação acadêmica do educando.

Muerte, destierro y simulacro estatal: la consulta previa entre los afrocolombianos

Beginning from an introductory characterization, of the main involved people who form the area of conflict, by the sense of the previous consultation in the country, what I propose in this article, is to create a brief scheme that allows to underline this one as a strategic right of the ethnical groups. The previous consultation and an integral way the agreement 169/89 OIT, inscribes in the complexity dialectical for the decolonization and liberation of these folks, against the capitalistic counterattack, on its new stage of primary accumulation, which consumes huge regions of the world. Here is raised that actually, linked to the neo-extractivism, the major ethnocide against the Afro-descendants born in the Americas, which is carrying it out in Colombia.

Self-defence: A state of mind for states?

This paper focuses upon a comparatively overlooked issue with regard to the scope of self-defence in international law: whether the subjective ‘psychological’ positions of the states concerned in a dispute involving the use force have any impact upon the lawfulness of an action avowedly taken in self-defence. There exists a long standing conception that the motives of a state responding in self-defence are relevant to the lawfulness of that response. The purity (or impurity) of a state's motive forms the basis of a distinction for many writers between a lawful self-defence action and an unlawful armed reprisal. Similarly, in recent decisions of the ICJ, the implication has been that the subjective intention of the attacking state may be relevant to the question of whether the attack perpetrated by that state can trigger the right of self-defence. The conclusion is reached here that the lawfulness of an avowed self-defence action should be premised upon objective criteria alone. Moreover, this reflects the law as it is in fact applied in practice. It is argued that the subjective ‘psychological’ position of either the responding or attacking state has no place in the final analysis of whether an action in self-defence was lawful or unlawful.

Coding of visual space during motor preparation: approaching objects rapidly modulate corticospinal excitability in hand-centered coordinates

Defensive behaviors, such as withdrawing your hand to avoid potentially harmful approaching objects, rely on rapid sensorimotor transformations between visual and motor coordinates. We examined the reference frame for coding visual information about objects approaching the hand during motor preparation. Subjects performed a simple visuomanual task while a task-irrelevant distractor ball rapidly approached a location either near to or far from their hand. After the distractor ball appearance, single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation were delivered over the subject's primary motor cortex, eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in their responding hand. MEP amplitude was reduced when the ball approached near the responding hand, both when the hand was on the left and the right of the midline. Strikingly, this suppression occurred very early, at 70-80ms after ball appearance, and was not modified by visual fixation location. Furthermore, it was selective for approaching balls, since static visual distractors did not modulate MEP amplitude. Together with additional behavioral measurements, we provide converging evidence for automatic hand-centered coding of visual space in the human brain.

Assimilation of RAPID array observations into an ocean model

Experiments assimilating the RAPID dataset of deep temperature and salinity profiles at 26.5°N on the western and eastern Atlantic boundaries into a 1° global NEMO ocean model have been performed. The meridional overturning circulation (MOC) is then assessed against the transports calculated directly from observations. The best initialization found for this short period was obtained by assimilating the EN3 upper-ocean hydrography database prior to 2004, after which different methods of assimilating 5-day average RAPID profiles at the western boundary were tested. The model MOC is strengthened by ∼ 2 Sv giving closer agreement with the RAPID array transports, when the western boundary profiles are assimilated only below 900 m (the approximate depth of the Florida Straits, which are not well resolved) and when the T,S observations are spread meridionally from 10 to 35°N along the deep western boundary. The use of boundary-focused covariances has the largest impact on the assimilation results, otherwise using more conventional Gaussian covariances has a very local impact on the MOC at 26°N with strong adverse impacts on the MOC stream function at higher and lower latitudes. Even using boundary-focused covariances only enables the MOC to be strengthened for ∼ 2 years, after which the increased transport of warm waters leads to a negative feedback on water formation in the subpolar gyre which then reduces the MOC. This negative feedback can be mitigated if EN3 hydrography data continue to be assimilated along with the RAPID array boundary data. Copyright © 2012 Royal Meteorological Society and Crown in the right of Canada.

The Article 51 reporting requirement for self-defense actions

This article examines one legal criterion for the exercise of the right of self-defense that has been significantly overlooked by commentators: the so-called “reporting requirement.” Article 51 of the United Nations (UN) Charter provides, inter alia, that “[m]easures taken by members in the exercise of this right of self-defense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council.” Although the requirement to report all self-defense actions to the Council is clearly set out in Article 51, the Charter offers no further guidance with regard to this obligation. Reference to the practice of states since the UN’s inception in 1945 is therefore essential to understanding the scope and nature of the reporting requirement. As such, this article is underpinned by an extensive original dataset of reporting practice covering the period from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2013. We know from Article 51 that states “shall” report, but do they, and—if so—in what manner? What are the various implications of reporting, of failing to report, and of the way in which states report? How are reports used, and by whom? Most importantly, this article questions the ultimate value of states reporting their self-defense actions to the Security Council in modern interstate relations.

The 'ratione temporis' elements of self-defence

This article focuses on one particular factor that is of crucial importance to all self-defence actions. It is a factor that is almost always present in the application and appraisal of the right, but one that is not always explicitly engaged with: time. There are various ratione temporis elements underpinning the lawful exercise of the right of self-defence, and questions related to the timing of both an attack being responded to in self-defence and the response itself are notably controversial. The self-defence timeline is therefore charted, and the key legal debates encountered along its trajectory are identified. In particular, there is a focus on three temporal ‘stages’ of the right of self-defence: (i) the much-debated question of preventative forms of self-defence (the ‘before’); (ii) the timeliness of a state's defensive action, or what is sometimes called the need for the response to be ‘immediate’ (the ‘during’); and (iii) the duration of self-defence actions, including the crucial issue of when they must end (the ‘after’). The aim of this article is not to break new substantive ground with regard to these ‘stages’ as such, but is, rather, to draw together the temporal strands of self-defence in a more focused manner than is often the case in the literature.

Working memory, reading ability and the effects of distance and typicality on anaphor resolution in children

We investigated the time course of anaphor resolution in children and whether this is modulated by individual differences in working memory and reading skill. The eye movements of 30 children (10-11 years) were monitored as they read short paragraphs in which (i) the semantic typicality of an antecedent and (ii) its distance in relation to an anaphor, were orthogonally manipulated. Children showed effects of distance and typicality on the anaphor itself, and also on the word to the right of the anaphor, suggesting that anaphoric processing begins immediately but continues after the eyes have left the anaphor. Furthermore, children showed no evidence of resolving anaphors in the most difficult condition (distant atypical antecedent), suggesting that anaphoric processing that is demanding may not occur online in children of this age. Finally, working memory capacity and reading comprehension skill affect the magnitude and time course of typicality and distance effects during anaphoric processing.

Search engine liability for autocomplete suggestions: personality, privacy and the power of the algorithm

This article is concerned with the liability of search engines for algorithmically produced search suggestions, such as through Google’s ‘autocomplete’ function. Liability in this context may arise when automatically generated associations have an offensive or defamatory meaning, or may even induce infringement of intellectual property rights. The increasing number of cases that have been brought before courts all over the world puts forward questions on the conflict of fundamental freedoms of speech and access to information on the one hand, and personality rights of individuals— under a broader right of informational self-determination—on the other. In the light of the recent judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU) in Google Spain v AEPD, this article concludes that many requests for removal of suggestions including private individuals’ information will be successful on the basis of EU data protection law, even absent prejudice to the person concerned.