Atrial natriuretic peptide administered as intravenous infusion or bolus injection to patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites.

The effect of a synthetic atrial natriuretic peptide (h-ANP, 25 amino acids, Wy-47.663) on blood pressure, renal electrolyte excretion, plasma catecholamines, and plasma renin activity was studied in nine patients with cirrhosis of the liver and ascites. The peptide was infused intravenously at 24-h intervals for 2 h in groups of four patients each in two different doses (0.015 and 0.075 micrograms/kg/min or 0.06 and 0.3 micrograms/kg/min). A control experiment with the vehicle was performed in all patients. In three patients h-ANP (1 and 2 micrograms/kg i.v.) was administered as an intravenous bolus injection. Consistent falls in blood pressure were observed during h-ANP infusion only with the two higher doses. The two lower infused doses induced a consistent natriuresis; this renal response was abolished when the two larger doses were used. When given as a bolus, h-ANP had a natriuretic effect comparable to that of the two lower doses of infused h-ANP. Plasma catecholamines and plasma renin activity increased during infusion of the two higher doses of h-ANP. It thus appears that in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, the natriuretic effect of infused h-ANP decreases rather than increases when the doses are raised. Bolus administration of h-ANP may be less prone to trigger counterbalancing responses and side-effects.

L'induction rapide du sevrage par des antagonistes des opiacés sous anesthésie: une alternative dans le traitement de la dépendance aux opiacés [Rapid induction of withdrawal with opiate antagonists under anesthesia: an alternative to treatment of opiate dependence?]

Rapid induction of withdrawal by opiate antagonists under anesthesia is an opiate detoxification technique. This technique is useful to reduce intensity and duration of withdrawal. Therefore, this technique represents an alternative strategy in the treatment of opiate addicted patients. This paper attempts to present a brief history of this technique, and a critical review of related issues.

Incidents occurring during anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of general versus regional anaesthesia

Background: The type of anesthesia to be used for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still a matter of debate. We compared the occurrence of per- and post-anesthesia incidents in patients receiving either general (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA). Methods: We used data from 29 hospitals, routinely collected in the Anaesthesia Databank Switzerland register between January 2001 and December 2003. We used multi-level logistic regression models. Results: There were more per- and post-anesthesia incidents under GA compared to RA (35.1% vs 32.7 %, n = 3191, and 23.1% vs 19.4%, n = 3258, respectively). In multi-level logistic regression analysis, RA was significantly associated with a lower incidence of per-anesthetic problems, especially hypertension, compared with GA. During the post-anesthetic period, RA was also less associated with pain. Conversely, RA was more associated with post-anesthetic hypotension, especially for epidural technique. In addition, age and ASA were more associated with incidents under GA compared to RA. Men were more associated with per-anesthetic problems under RA compared to GA. Whereas increased age (>67), gender (male), and ASA were linked with the choice of RA, we noticed that this choice depended also on hospital practices after we adjusted for the other variables. Conclusions: Compared to RA, GA was associated with an increased proportion of per- and post-anesthesia incidents. Although this study is only observational, it is rooted in daily practice. Whereas RA might be routinely proposed, GA might be indicated because of contraindications to RA, patients' preferences or other surgical or anaesthesiology related reasons. Finally, the choice of a type of anesthesia seems to depend on local practices that may differ between hospitals.

Rupture of a concealed aneurysm after intravenous thrombolysis of a thrombus in the parent middle cerebral artery.

BACKGROUND: Management of ischemic stroke in the presence of aneurysmal brain disease is controversial. Recent retrospective evidence suggests that in selected patients, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains a safe approach for reperfusion. METHODS: We document a case of post-thrombolysis aneurysmal rupture. Supported by additional scientific literature we postulate that acute aneurysmal thrombosis leading to stroke in the culprit artery may be an ominous sign of rupture and should be considered separately from fortuitously discovered distant aneurysmal disease. RESULTS: A 71-year-old female presented with an acute right middle cerebral artery stroke syndrome. IVT allowed vessel reperfusion and revealed a previously concealed, juxtaposed non-giant M1 segment saccular aneurysm. Secondary aneurysmal rupture ensued. The aneurysm was secured by surgical clipping. Postoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: This case shows that despite reports of thrombolysis safety in the presence of brain aneurysms, thrombolysis remains potentially hazardous and hints toward an increased risk when the stroke arises on the parent vessel itself.

Pharmacodynamic and humoral effects of single intravenous doses of captopril in normal subjects.

The blood pressure, heart rate and humoral responses to single intravenous doses of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor captopril were evaluated in 5 volunteers on a free salt intake. Each subject was given at one-week intervals a 1, 5 and 25 mg intravenous dose of captopril as well as the vehicle of captopril. The study was conducted in a single-blind fashion and the order of treatment phases was randomized. Captopril was found to inhibit the renin-angiotensin system in a dose-dependent fashion. A fall in circulating angiotensin II was observed with doses of 1 and 5 mg. Plasma angiotensin II was not detectable 15 min after the 25 mg dose. Acute inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme with intravenous captopril had no effect on blood pressure and heart rate.

Concomitant administration of intravenous drugs in the ICU: evaluation of physico-chemical compatibilities

Background and objective: Patients in the ICU often get many intravenous (iv) drugs at the same time. Even with three-lumen central venous catheters, the administration of more than one drug in the same iv line (IVL) is frequently necessary. The objective of this study was to observe how nurses managed to administer these many medications and to evaluate the proportion of two-drugs associations (TDA) that are compatible or not, based on known compatibility data. Design: Observational prospective study over 4 consecutive months. All patients receiving simultaneously more than one drugs in the same IVL (Y-site injection or mixed in the same container) were included. For each patient, all iv drugs were recorded, as well as concentration, infusion solution, location on the IVL system, time, rate and duration of administration. For each association of two or more drugs, compatibility of each drug was checked with each other. Compatibilities between these pairs of drugs were assessed using published data (mainly Trissel LA. Handbook on Injectable Drugs and Trissel's Tables of Physical Compatibility) and visual tests performed in our quality control laboratory. Setting: 34 beds university hospital adult ICU. Main outcome measures: Percentage of compatibilities and incompatibilities between drugs administered in the same IVL. Results: We observed 1,913 associations of drugs administered together in the same IVL, 783 implying only two drugs. The average number of drugs per IVL was 3.1 ± 0.8 (range: 2-9). 83.2% of the drugs were given by continuous infusion, 14.3% by intermittent infusion and 2.5% in bolus. The associations observed allowed to form 8,421 pairs of drugs (71.7% drug-drug and 28.3% drug-solute). According to literature data, 80.2% of the association were considered as compatible and 4.4% incompatible. 15.4% were not interpretable because of different conditions between local practices and those described in the literature (drug concentration, solute, etc.) or because of a lack of data. After laboratory tests performed on the most used drugs (furosemide, KH2PO4, morphine HCl, etc.), the proportion of compatible TDA raised to 85.7%, the incompatible stayed at 4.6% and only 9.7% remain unknown or not interpretable. Conclusions: Nurses managed the administration of iv medications quite well, as only less than 5% of observed TDA were considered as incompatible. But the 10% of TDA with unavailable compatibility data should have been avoided too, since the consequences of their concomitant administration cannot be predictable. For practical reasons, drugs were analysed only by pairs, which constitutes the main limit of this work. The average number of drugs in the same association being three, laboratory tests are currently performed to evaluate some of the most observed three-drugs associations.

Oral and intravenous methadone use: some clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects.

A sample of 15 patients participating in an injectable methadone trial and of 15 patients in an oral methadone maintenance treatment, who admitted injecting part or all of their methadone take-home doses, were compared to 20 patients in maintenance treatment who use methadone exclusively by mouth. The present study confirms the poorer general health, the higher levels of emotional, psychological or psychiatric problems, the higher use of illicit drugs, and the higher number of problems related to employment and support associated with the use of the intravenous mode of administration of methadone. As expected, due to the shunt of metabolism in the gut wall and of the liver first-pass effect, higher concentration to dose ratios of (R)-methadone, which is the active enantiomer, were measured in the intravenous group (23% increase). This difference reached an almost statistically significant value (P = 0.054). This raises the question whether the effect of a higher methadone dose could be unconsciously sought by some of the intravenous methadone users.

Le sevrage ultra-rapide sous anesthésie générale: l'expérience de l'Hôpital de St-Loup [Ultrafast opiate detoxification under general anesthesia: the St. Loup Hospital experience]

Rapid antagonist induction under anesthesia is a method that has been increasingly used to detoxify opiate addicts. These procedures are useful to reduce the duration and the discomfort of withdrawal. However, the high risk and the cost of these methods require randomized clinical trial to evaluate safety and clinical effectiveness. The University Substance Abuse Division of Lausanne and the Intensive Care Unit of the St-Loup Hospital work on a randomized clinical trial comparing anesthesia-assisted versus traditional clonidine detoxification combined with an additional psychosocial week. This paper describes the technique of anesthesia used in our study. Our clinical experience suggests that, integrating this technique in a multidisciplinary network, with a strong emphasis on post-anesthetic follow-up, is a viable and safe option in the treatment of opiate dependence.

Intravenous thrombolysis in nonagenarians with ischemic stroke.

Background and Purpose-Demographic changes will result in a rapid increase of patients age >= 90 years (nonagenarians), but little is known about outcomes in these patients after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to assess safety and functional outcome in nonagenarians treated with IVT and to compare the outcomes with those of patients age 80 to 89 years (octogenarians).Methods-We analyzed prospectively collected data of 284 consecutive stroke patients age >= 80 years treated with IVT in 7 Swiss stroke units. Presenting characteristics, favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0 or 1), mortality at 3 months, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) criteria were compared between nonagenarians and octogenarians.Results-As compared with octogenarians (n=238; mean age, 83 years), nonagenarians (n=46; mean age, 92 years) were more often women (70% versus 54%; P=0.046) and had lower systolic blood pressure (161 mm Hg versus 172 mm Hg; P=0.035). Patients age >= 90 years less often had a favorable outcome and had a higher incidence of mortality than did patients age 80 to 89 years (14.3% versus 30.2%; P=0.034; and 45.2% versus 22.1%; P=0.002; respectively), while more nonagenarians than octogenarians experienced a SICH (SICHNINDS, 13.3% versus 5.9%; P=0.106; SICHSITS-MOST, 13.3% versus 4.7%; P=0.037). Multivariate adjustment identified age >= 90 years as an independent predictor of mortality (P=0.017).Conclusions-Our study suggests less favorable outcomes in nonagenarians as compared with octogenarians after IVT for ischemic stroke, and it demands a careful selection for treatment, unless randomized controlled trials yield more evidence for IVT in very old stroke patients. (Stroke. 2011; 42: 1967-1970.)

Is intracerebral hemorrhage a time-dependent phenomenon after successful combined intravenous and intra-arterial therapy?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Onset-to-reperfusion time (ORT) has recently emerged as an essential prognostic factor in acute ischemic stroke therapy. Although favorable outcome is associated with reduced ORT, it remains unclear whether intracranial bleeding depends on ORT. We therefore sought to determine whether ORT influenced the risk and volume of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after combined intravenous and intra-arterial therapy. METHODS: Based on our prospective registry, we included 157 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients successfully recanalized with combined intravenous and intra-arterial therapy between April 2007 and October 2011. Primary outcome was any ICH within 24 hours posttreatment. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of symptomatic ICH (sICH) and ICH volume measured with the ABC/2. RESULTS: Any ICH occurred in 26% of the study sample (n=33). sICH occurred in 5.5% (n=7). Median ICH volume was 0.8 mL. ORT was increased in patients with ICH (median=260 minutes; interquartile range=230-306) compared with patients without ICH (median=226 minutes; interquartile range=200-281; P=0.008). In the setting of sICH, ORT reached a median of 300 minutes (interquartile range=276-401; P=0.004). The difference remained significant after adjustment for potential confounding factors (adjusted P=0.045 for ICH; adjusted P=0.002 for sICH). There was no correlation between ICH volume and ORT (r=0.16; P=0.33). CONCLUSIONS: ORT influences the rate but not the volume of ICH and appears to be a critical predictor of symptomatic hemorrhage after successful combined intravenous and intra-arterial therapy. To minimize the risk of bleeding, revascularization should be achieved within 4.5 hours of stroke onset.

Ulnar nerve transposition at the elbow : local anesthesia should be preferred to general anesthesia

Après la compression du nerf médian au niveau du tunnel carpien, la compression du nerf ulnaire au niveau du coude est le deuxième syndrome compressif le plus fréquent des nerfs périphériques. La chirurgie des nerfs périphériques consiste dans une décompression nerveuse et est caractérisée par un suivi post¬opératoire parfois très douloureux avec des douleurs qui peuvent chroniciser si insuffisamment traitées. Le traitement chirurgical de décompression nerveuse se fait traditionnellement sous anesthésie générale ou régionale. Une analgésie post-opératoire plus efficace et durable avec moindre risque de chronicisation avait justifié ce choix jusqu'à ce jour. Grâce au développement de la chirurgie ambulatoire ces dernières années, un grand nombre d'interventions chirurgicales au niveau de la main sont effectués sous anesthésie locale. Au vu d'une meilleure connaissance de cette technique d'anesthésie, son rôle dans la chirurgie des nerfs périphériques a été remis en question. Alors que plusieurs études ont démontré que l'anesthésie locale est aussi efficace que l'anesthésie générale et régionale au sujet de la chirurgie du tunnel carpien, son utilisation pour la chirurgie du nerf ulnaire reste peu connue. La raison de l'hésitation à l'utilisation de l'anesthésie locale pour le traitement du tunnel ulnaire est due au fait que dans plus de la moitié des cas, une simple décompression n'est pas suffisante et qu'il est souvent nécessaire de transposer le nerf ulnaire devant l'épicondyle ulnaire. La seule publication disponible au sujet de l'utilisation de l'anesthésie locale dans le traitement du tunnel ulnaire considère comme irréalisable d'utiliser cette méthode dans le cas d'une transposition. Malgré cette mise en garde, nous avons, depuis plusieurs années, des excellents résultats avec la transposition du nerf ulnaire sous anesthésie locale. Avec le but d'objectiver notre expérience dans ce domaine nous avons souhaité analyser nos résultats de façon rétrospective avec particulière attention aux douleurs post-opératoires et à la satisfaction des patients. Les dossiers de cinquante patients Consécutifs (26F, 24M) opérés par le même chirurgien dans notre service de 2002 à 2012 ont été analysés rétrospectivement. Les critères suivants ont été récoltés: l'âge du patient, la profession, la main dominante, les détails des techniques opératoires utilisées, le type d'anesthésie, l'intensité du suivi ainsi que les complications, le niveau de douleur dans l'immédiat post-opératorie ainsi que à une année de l'intervention. Les patients ont été divisés en 4 groupes: les opérés sous anesthésie générale avec transposition du nerf (n=17) ou sans transposition (n=10) et les opérés sous anesthésie locale avec transposition (n=12) ou sans transposition (n=11). Au premier jour la douleur était comparable dans tous les groupes. A une semaine, elle était deux fois plus importante lorsque la transposition avait été réalisée sous anesthésie générale par rapport à si une anesthésie locale avait été effectuée (p=0.03). La satisfaction s'est révélée plus élevée mais non significative chez les patients opérés sous anesthésie locale. Ces derniers étaient significativement plus enclins à répéter la chirurgie comparé a ceux opérés sous anesthésie générale (p=0.04). En conclusion, les résultats de cette étude suggèrent que l'anesthésie locale est au moins autant efficace que l'anesthésie générale en termes de complications et de douleurs post-opératoires indépendamment du fait qu'une transposition nerveuse soit effectuée ou pas. Un meilleur contrôle des douleurs à une semaine post-opératoire a contribué à une haute satisfaction des patients de notre étude.

Randomised trial of oral versus sequential intravenous/oral cephalosporins in children with pyelonephritis.

The hypothesis was tested that oral antibiotic treatment in children with acute pyelonephritis and scintigraphy-documented lesions is equally as efficacious as sequential intravenous/oral therapy with respect to the incidence of renal scarring. A randomised multi-centre trial was conducted in 365 children aged 6 months to 16 years with bacterial growth in cultures from urine collected by catheter. The children were assigned to receive either oral ceftibuten (9 mg/kg once daily) for 14 days or intravenous ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg once daily) for 3 days followed by oral ceftibuten for 11 days. Only patients with lesions detected on acute-phase dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy underwent follow-up scintigraphy. Efficacy was evaluated by the rate of renal scarring after 6 months on follow-up scintigraphy. Of 219 children with lesions on acute-phase scintigraphy, 152 completed the study; 80 (72 females, median age 2.2 years) were given ceftibuten and 72 (62 females, median age 1.6 years) were given ceftriaxone/ceftibuten. Patients in the intravenous/oral group had significantly higher C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations at baseline and larger lesion(s) on acute-phase scintigraphy. Follow-up scintigraphy showed renal scarring in 21/80 children treated with ceftibuten and 33/72 with ceftriaxone/ceftibuten (p = 0.01). However, after adjustment for the confounding variables (CRP and size of acute-phase lesion), no significant difference was observed for renal scarring between the two groups (p = 0.2). Renal scarring correlated with the extent of the acute-phase lesion (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001) and the grade of vesico-ureteric reflux (r = 0.31, p = 0.03), and was more frequent in refluxing renal units (p = 0.04). The majority of patients, i.e. 44 in the oral group and 47 in the intravenous/oral group, were managed as out-patients. Side effects were not observed. From this study, we can conclude that once-daily oral ceftibuten for 14 days yielded comparable results to sequential ceftriaxone/ceftibuten treatment in children aged 6 months to 16 years with DMSA-documented acute pyelonephritis and it allowed out-patient management in the majority of these children.