Risk perception by healthcare professionals related to drug use during pregnancy: a Swiss survey.

PRINCIPLE: Healthcare professionals' (HCPs') perception of risk associated with drug use in pregnancy may have an impact on the pharmacological treatment of some women. The aim of this study was to examine this risk perception in a sample of Swiss HCPs with a special focus on their knowledge and use of available specialised information sources. METHOD: An online, French and German, questionnaire was e-mailed to 7,136 members of four Swiss professional societies (gynaecologists, paediatricians, midwives and pharmacists). The questionnaire was designed (a) to collect demographic characteristics, (b) to evaluate the frequency of use of several specialised sources of information on drugs in pregnancy in their daily practice, and (c) to examine the perception of risk associated with drug use during pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 1,310 questionnaires were collected (response rate of 18.4%). More than 80% of the respondent HCPs use the Swiss Drug Reference Book (Compendium) to assess the risk associated with drugs during pregnancy and are not aware of available specialised information sources (books, websites or information centres). Despite some disparities between HPCs, the risk related to drug intake was overall highly misperceived. Blinded reading of three product monographs in the Compendium was associated with an overestimated perception of risk (e.g., after reading the "paracetamol" monograph, 38% of the participants stated they would probably not advise the use of this drug to a pregnant patient). CONCLUSION: Overall, an overestimation of the risk associated with drug use during pregnancy has been observed in our sample of HCPs, which might be related to the underuse of specialised information source among other factors. These findings evidenced the need for increased training for HCPs in order to optimise medication use during pregnancy. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and identify causes.

Le choix de vivre en ville-centre : interactions entre mobilité quotidienne et mobilité résidentielle

Cet article s'insère dans un double débat : celui de l'influence des formes urbaines sur les pratiques modales et celui relatif au regain d'attractivité des villes pour les classes moyennes supérieures. Il aborde les interactions entre mobilité quotidienne et mobilité résidentielle dans un nouveau quartier d'une ville de taille moyenne. Les choix résidentiels étudiés se basent en grande partie sur la valorisation de la proximité. Toutefois, plusieurs styles de mobilité coexistent au sein de ce même contexte territorial en fonction notamment des parts modales des transports publics et de l'automobile.

Factors associated with healthcare professionals' intent to stay in hospital: a comparison across five occupational categories.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with intent to stay in hospital among five different categories of healthcare professionals using an adapted version of the conceptual model of intent to stay (CMIS). DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey targeting Lausanne University Hospital employees performed in the fall of 2011. Multigroup structural equation modeling was used to test the adapted CMIS model among professional groups. Measures Satisfaction, self-fulfillment, workload, working conditions, burnout, overall job satisfaction, institutional identification and intent to stay. PARTICIPANTS: Surveys of 3364 respondents: 494 physicians, 1228 nurses, 509 laboratory technicians, 935 administrative staff and 198 psycho-social workers. RESULTS: For all professional categories, self-fulfillment increased intent to stay (all β > 0.14, P < 0.05). Burnout decreased intent to stay by weakening job satisfaction (β < -0.23 and β > 0.22, P < 0.05). Some factors were associated with specific professional categories: workload was associated with nurses' intent to stay (β = -0.15), and physicians' institutional identification mitigated the effect of burnout on intent to stay (β = -0.15 and β = 0.19). CONCLUSION: Respondents' intent to stay in a position depended both on global and profession-specific factors. The identification of these factors may help in mapping interventions and retention plans at both a hospital level and professional groups' level.

Group motivational intervention in overweight/obese patients in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the primary healthcare area

Background The global mortality caused by cardiovascular disease increases with weight. The Framingham study showed that obesity is a cardiovascular risk factor independent of other risks such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and smoking. Moreover, the main problem in the management of weight-loss is its maintenance, if it is achieved. We have designed a study to determine whether a group motivational intervention, together with current clinical practice, is more efficient than the latter alone in the treatment of overweight and obesity, for initial weight loss and essentially to achieve maintenance of the weight achieved; and, secondly, to know if this intervention is more effective for reducing cardiovascular risk factors associated with overweight and obesity. Methods This 26-month follow up multi-centre trial, will include 1200 overweight/obese patients. Random assignment of the intervention by Basic Health Areas (BHA): two geographically separate groups have been created, one of which receives group motivational intervention (group intervention), delivered by a nurse trained by an expert phsychologist, in 32 group sessions, 1 to 12 fortnightly, and 13 to 32, monthly, on top of their standard program of diet, exercise, and the other (control group), receiving the usual follow up, with regular visits every 3 months. Discussion By addressing currently unanswered questions regarding the maintenance in weight loss in obesity/overweight, upon the expected completion of participant follow-up in 2012, the IMOAP trial should document, for the first time, the benefits of a motivational intervention as a treatment tool of weight loss in a primary care setting.

Diabetes care: opinions, needs and proposed solutions of Swiss patients and healthcare professionals: a qualitative study.

AIMS: To explore, both among patients with diabetes and healthcare professionals, opinions on current diabetes care and the development of the "Regional Diabetes Program". METHODS: We employed qualitative methods (focus groups - FG) and used purposive sampling strategy to recruit patients with diabetes and healthcare professionals. We conducted one diabetic and one professional FG in each of the four health regions of the canton of Vaud/Switzerland. The eight FGs were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was then undertaken. RESULTS: Results showed variability in the perception of the quality of diabetes care, pointed to insufficient information regarding diabetes, and lack of collaboration. Participants also evoked patients' difficulties for self-management, as well as professionals' and patients' financial concerns. Proposed solutions included reinforcing existing structures, developing self-management education, and focusing on comprehensive and coordinated care, communication and teamwork. Patients and professionals were in favour of a "Regional Diabetes Program" tailored to the actors' needs, and viewed it as a means to reinforce existing care delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and professionals pointed out similar problems and solutions but explored them differently. Combined with coming quantitative data, these results should help to further develop, adapt and implement the "Regional Diabetes Program".

Application of European accounting standards to the public healthcare sector: a comparative study on the application of the European System of Accounts ESA-95 to healthcare centres in the United Kingdom, France and Germany

This report aims to analyse how European accounting standards (European System of Accounts ESA-95) are interpreted and applied to the public healthcare sector, from the standpoint of comparative law. Specifically, the study focuses on the application of ESA-95 to healthcare centres in the United Kingdom, France and Germany, with the aim of reaching useful conclusions for the Public Companies and Consortia (EPIC, for their initials in Catalan) in the Catalan Public Healthcare System.

Canal lombaire étroit. Corrélation entre imagerie et mobilité chez des sujets présentant une sténose canalaire lombaire

La sténose du canal médullaire lombaire peut aujourd'hui se traiter de deux façons différentes à savoir le traitement non- chirurgical (physiothérapie, AINS, infiltrations de corticostéroïdes) pour les patients souffrant de symptômes modérés et le traitement chirurgical (décompression canalaire) pour les patients avec des symptômes graves et des déficits fonctionnels. Plusieurs études ont tenté de comparer ces deux approches thérapeutiques. Pour ce faire, on se servit de questionnaires d'évaluation subjective des capacités fonctionnelles (Oswestry Disability Index) souvent associés à des mesures des capacités de marche en laboratoire.¦Notre étude utilise des capteurs gyroscopiques placés sur le corps des sujets afin de mesurer des paramètres de positions, de transferts de position et de la marche pendant 5 jours consécutifs. Cette méthode nous permet d'effectuer ces mesures objectives dans le cadre de vie des patients, dans leurs activités quotidiennes. Nous espérons ainsi obtenir des résultats qui soient plus représentatifs de leur mobilité.¦Dans le cadre de mon travail de master, je me suis concentré sur la phase pilote d'une étude du Dr Schizas. Cette phase ne regroupe qu'un nombre limité de sujets (14) répartis en deux groupes de 7 suivant le traitement reçu (chir. contre non-chir). Nous avons alors émis trois hypothèses. La première dit que, avant traitement, les patients non-opérés marchent mieux que les patients destinés à la chirurgie (symptômes moins intenses). La deuxième postule que le traitement chirurgical permet d'atténuer suffisamment les symptômes pour que les capacités de marche se rapprochent de celles des patients non opérés avant traitement (efficacité de la chirurgie). Pour finir, notre dernière hypothèse prétend que, après la chirurgie, les patients opérés voient une amélioration de leur capacité de marche par rapport à celles qu'ils avaient avant l'intervention. 4 paramètres ont été retenus afin de caractériser la marche: la longueur des pas, la vitesse, la cadence des pas et la distance parcourue. C'est à partir des moyennes et des coefficients de variabilité de ces paramètres que nous avons effectué nos comparaisons.¦Après l'analyse de nos résultats, il s'avère que nos valeurs tendent à valider nos trois hypothèses à quelques exceptions près. Hypothèse n°1: avant traitement, les patients non destinés à la chirurgie marchent plus vite (2.96 contre 2.87 P 0.84) et avec une cadence des pas plus importante (101.78 contre 94.59 P 0.047). Seule la longueur des pas est plus importante chez les futurs opérés (1.01 contre 0.96 P 0.72). Les coefficients de variabilité (CV) sont tous plus faibles chez les non-opérés (marche plus homogène). Concernant notre 2ème hypothèse, nous sommes plutôt satisfaits des résultats. A 3 mois après la chirurgie, les patients opérés, comparés aux non-opérés avant traitement ont une longueur de pas similaire (1.02 contre 0.96 P 0.70) et une vitesse plus importante (3.08 contre 2.96 P 0.83). Seule la cadence des pas est plus élevée chez les non-opérés (101.78 contre 100.23 P 0.72). Les CV confirment également un rapprochement des capacités de marche de nos patients opérés de celles des non-opérés. Pour la troisième hypothèse, nous sommes heureux de constater que les moyennes et les CV sont tous en accord avec l'idée de base. A trois mois post-traitement les patients opérés font des pas de longueur similaire (1.02 contre 1.01 P 0.93), marchent plus vite (3.08 contre 2.89 P 0.52) et à une cadence plus importante (100.23 contre 94.59 P 0.19).¦Avec seulement 14 patients, il est bien clair que ces résultats n'ont que peu de valeur statistique. Cependant, ces résultats nous encouragent à poursuivre cette étude sur un collectif de patients plus important dans le but de mieux comprendre les troubles de la mobilité des personnes atteintes de canal lombaire étroit.

Overall Burden of Healthcare-Associated Infections Among Surgical Patients: Results of a National Study.

OBJECTIVE:: To assess the overall burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in patients exposed and nonexposed to surgery. BACKGROUND:: Targeted HAI surveillance is common in healthcare institutions, but may underestimate the overall burden of disease. METHODS:: Prevalence study among patients hospitalized in 50 acute care hospitals participating in the Swiss Nosocomial Infection Prevalence surveillance program. RESULTS:: Of 8273 patients, 3377 (40.8%) had recent surgery. Overall, HAI was present in 358 (10.6%) patients exposed to surgery, but only in 206 (4.2%) of 4896 nonexposed (P < 0.001). Prevalence of surgical site infection (SSI) was 5.4%. Healthcare-associated infections prevalence excluding SSI was 6.5% in patients with surgery and 4.7% in those without (P < 0.0001). Patients exposed to surgery carried less intrinsic risk factors for infection (age >60 years, 55.6% vs 63.0%; American Society of Anesthesiologists score >3, 5.9% vs 9.3%; McCabe for rapidly fatal disease, 3.9% vs 6.6%; Charlson comorbidity index >2, 12.3% vs 20.9%, respectively; all P < 0.001) than those nonexposed, but more extrinsic risk factors (urinary catheters, 39.6% vs 14.1%; central venous catheters, 17.8% vs 7.1%; mechanical ventilation, 4.7% vs 1.3%; intensive care stay, 18.3% vs 8.8%, respectively; all P < 0.001). Exposure to surgery independently predicted an increased risk of HAI (odds ratio 2.43; 95% CI 2.0-3.0). CONCLUSIONS:: Despite a lower intrinsic risk, patients exposed to surgery carried more than twice the overall HAI burden than those nonexposed; almost half was accountable to SSI. Extending infection control efforts beyond SSI prevention in these patients might be rewarding, especially because of the extrinsic nature of risk factors.

Chronic disease management: a qualitative study investigating the barriers, facilitators and incentives perceived by Swiss healthcare stakeholders.

BACKGROUND: Chronic disease management has been implemented for some time in several countries to tackle the increasing burden of chronic diseases. While Switzerland faces the same challenge, such initiatives have only emerged recently in this country. The aim of this study is to assess their feasibility, in terms of barriers, facilitators and incentives to participation. METHODS: To meet our aim, we used qualitative methods involving the collection of opinions of various healthcare stakeholders, by means of 5 focus groups and 33 individual interviews. All the data were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was then performed and five levels were determined to categorize the data: political, financial, organisational/ structural, professionals and patients. RESULTS: Our results show that, at each level, stakeholders share common opinions towards the feasibility of chronic disease management in Switzerland. They mainly mention barriers linked to the federalist political organization as well as to financing such programs. They also envision difficulties to motivate both patients and healthcare professionals to participate. Nevertheless, their favourable attitudes towards chronic disease management as well as the fact that they are convinced that Switzerland possesses all the resources (financial, structural and human) to develop such programs constitute important facilitators. The implementation of quality and financial incentives could also foster the participation of the actors. CONCLUSIONS: Even if healthcare stakeholders do not have the same role and interest regarding chronic diseases, they express similar opinions on the development of chronic disease management in Switzerland. Their overall positive attitude shows that it could be further implemented if political, financial and organisational barriers are overcome and if incentives are found to face the scepticism and non-motivation of some stakeholders.