Development process and initial validation of the ethical conflict in nursing questionnaire-critical care version

Background: Ethical conflicts are arising as a result of the growing complexity of clinical care, coupled with technological advances. Most studies that have developed instruments for measuring ethical conflict base their measures on the variables"frequency" and"degree of conflict". In our view, however, these variables are insufficient for explaining the root of ethical conflicts. Consequently, the present study formulates a conceptual model that also includes the variable"exposure to conflict", as well as considering six"types of ethical conflict". An instrument was then designed to measure the ethical conflicts experienced by nurses who work with critical care patients. The paper describes the development process and validation of this instrument, the Ethical Conflict in Nursing Questionnaire Critical Care Version (ECNQ-CCV). Methods: The sample comprised 205 nursing professionals from the critical care units of two hospitals in Barcelona (Spain). The ECNQ-CCV presents 19 nursing scenarios with the potential to produce ethical conflict in the critical care setting. Exposure to ethical conflict was assessed by means of the Index of Exposure to Ethical Conflict (IEEC), a specific index developed to provide a reference value for each respondent by combining the intensity and frequency of occurrence of each scenario featured in the ECNQ-CCV. Following content validity, construct validity was assessed by means of Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), while Cronbach"s alpha was used to evaluate the instrument"s reliability. All analyses were performed using the statistical software PASW v19. Results: Cronbach"s alpha for the ECNQ-CCV as a whole was 0.882, which is higher than the values reported for certain other related instruments. The EFA suggested a unidimensional structure, with one component accounting for 33.41% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The ECNQ-CCV is shown to a valid and reliable instrument for use in critical care units. Its structure is such that the four variables on which our model of ethical conflict is based may be studied separately or in combination. The critical care nurses in this sample present moderate levels of exposure to ethical conflict. This study represents the first evaluation of the ECNQ-CCV.

Children's experience regarding the quality of their hospital stay: the development of an assessment questionnaire for children

A questionnaire assessing the satisfaction of children with their hospital stay has been developed and tested with 136 children (aged 6-12 years) at 2 Swiss hospital sites. Three out of 4 children were satisfied overall with their hospital stay. Their relationships with the professional medical staff, explanations they received, games they played, and environment, all received positive evaluations. The most critical points were pain, fear, and the absence of relatives. Ninety percent of the children appreciated that their opinions were sought. These results reinforce the importance of having questionnaires available for the children to consider their opinions to enhance the quality of care.

Service Learning Questionnaire

This questionnaire aims to evaluate your experience of taking part in the project you are carrying out at the university. The questionnaire is anonymous and will not take more than 10 minutes of your time to complete. We would appreciate your honest opinion, in order that the data we gather here can be as useful as possible for improving the project.

Service Learning Questionnaire

This questionnaire aims to evaluate your experience of taking part in the project you are carrying out at the university. The questionnaire is anonymous and will not take more than 10 minutes of your time to complete. We would appreciate your honest opinion, in order that the data we gather here can be as useful as possible for improving the project.

Service Learning Questionnaire

This questionnaire aims to evaluate your experience of taking part in the project you are carrying out at the university. The questionnaire is anonymous and will not take more than 10 minutes of your time to complete. We would appreciate your honest opinion, in order that the data we gather here can be as useful as possible for improving the project.

Service Learning Questionnaire

This questionnaire aims to evaluate your experience of taking part in the project you are carrying out at the university. The questionnaire is anonymous and will not take more than 10 minutes of your time to complete. We would appreciate your honest opinion, in order that the data we gather here can be as useful as possible for improving the project.

[Archives de la parole]. , [Traduction du questionnaire] ; [Le coucou] : [fable]. [La fouine] : [fable] / [Ferdinand Brunot], collecteur ; [Abbé Jacob, curé de Saint-Chartier], voix

[Traditions. France. Berry]

[Archives de la parole]. , [Traduction du questionnaire] ; [Le coucou] : [fable] ; [La fouine] : [fable] / [Ferdinand Brunot], collecteur ; [Abbé Jacob, curé de Saint-Chartier], voix

[Traditions. France. Berry]

The INTERMED questionnaire for predicting return to work after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the INTERMED questionnaire score, alone or combined with other criteria, in predicting return to work after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. METHODS: The INTERMED questionnaire is a biopsychosocial assessment and clinical classification tool that separates heterogeneous populations into subgroups according to case complexity. We studied 88 patients with chronic low back pain who followed an intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation program on an outpatient basis. Before the program, we recorded the INTERMED score, radiological abnormalities, subjective pain severity, and sick leave duration. Associations between these variables and return to full-time work within 3 months after the end of the program were evaluated using one-sided Fisher tests and univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The univariate analysis showed a significant association between the INTERMED score and return to work (P<0.001; odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.96). In the multivariate analysis, prediction was best when the INTERMED score and sick leave duration were used in combination (P=0.03; odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.93). CONCLUSION: The INTERMED questionnaire is useful for evaluating patients with chronic low back pain. It could be used to improve the selection of patients for intensive multidisciplinary programs, thereby improving the quality of care, while reducing healthcare costs.