Los críticos de lo crítico: una defensa de la razón posestructuralista en la teoría de relaciones internacionales (Otros Temas)

Este artículo presenta una defensa de lo que podemos denominar la “razón posestructural” en la teoría de las relaciones internacionales. Particularmente, centraremos nuestra atención en tres argumentos críticos comúnmente vertidos contra el posestructuralismo: el de la crítica vacía, la negación de la realidad y el del relativismo. El argumento que este ensayo defiende es que dichas críticas se concentran no en lo que el posestructuralismo dice, sino en aquello que este se niega a decir y para hacerlo recurre a una inútil reiteración de sus propios postulados teóricos. El análisis que llevaremos a cabo le presta especial atención a por qué el posestructuralismo circunscribe posiciones fundacionalistas y al hacerlo enfatizaremos y explicaremos varios de los caminos teóricos que este se rehúsa a tomar.

A contribuição marxista para o estudo das relações internacionais

The article examines the marxist contribution to the study of international relations stressing the historical dimension in the social groups and political economy as a fundamental variable. Thus, marxism provides resources to a comprehensive analysis of international relations, deconstructing the concept of state as is understood by the dominant theories in the area.

A cooperação internacional em programas de produtos de defesa e seus atores: o caso Brasil e África do Sul no desenvolvimento do míssil A-Darter

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Reflexões sobre a idéia de sociedade civil global e a ação política não-estatal além das fronteiras

Pós-graduação em Relações Internacionais (UNESP - UNICAMP - PUC-SP) - FFC

Areves notas sobre a recepção das ideias maquiavelianas no pensamento militar e na teoria das relações internacionais

This text aims to present a very short review on Machiavelli’s ideas reception concerning his military thought and short reflections on international affairs, as part of what was called realism in the realm of international relations theory. The text deals with much more emphasis the mentioned interpretations in a very concise way within contemporary studies about maquiavelian legacy on contemporary studies in International Relations.

Essays on the political economy of European integration

Recently, a rising interest in political and economic integration/disintegration issues has been developed in the political economy field. This growing strand of literature partly draws on traditional issues of fiscal federalism and optimum public good provision and focuses on a trade-off between the benefits of centralization, arising from economies of scale or externalities, and the costs of harmonizing policies as a consequence of the increased heterogeneity of individual preferences in an international union or in a country composed of at least two regions. This thesis stems from this strand of literature and aims to shed some light on two highly relevant aspects of the political economy of European integration. The first concerns the role of public opinion in the integration process; more precisely, how economic benefits and costs of integration shape citizens' support for European Union (EU) membership. The second is the allocation of policy competences among different levels of government: European, national and regional. Chapter 1 introduces the topics developed in this thesis by reviewing the main recent theoretical developments in the political economy analysis of integration processes. It is structured as follows. First, it briefly surveys a few relevant articles on economic theories of integration and disintegration processes (Alesina and Spolaore 1997, Bolton and Roland 1997, Alesina et al. 2000, Casella and Feinstein 2002) and discusses their relevance for the study of the impact of economic benefits and costs on public opinion attitude towards the EU. Subsequently, it explores the links existing between such political economy literature and theories of fiscal federalism, especially with regard to normative considerations concerning the optimal allocation of competences in a union. Chapter 2 firstly proposes a model of citizens’ support for membership of international unions, with explicit reference to the EU; subsequently it tests the model on a panel of EU countries. What are the factors that influence public opinion support for the European Union (EU)? In international relations theory, the idea that citizens' support for the EU depends on material benefits deriving from integration, i.e. whether European integration makes individuals economically better off (utilitarian support), has been common since the 1970s, but has never been the subject of a formal treatment (Hix 2005). A small number of studies in the 1990s have investigated econometrically the link between national economic performance and mass support for European integration (Eichenberg and Dalton 1993; Anderson and Kalthenthaler 1996), but only making informal assumptions. The main aim of Chapter 2 is thus to propose and test our model with a view to providing a more complete and theoretically grounded picture of public support for the EU. Following theories of utilitarian support, we assume that citizens are in favour of membership if they receive economic benefits from it. To develop this idea, we propose a simple political economic model drawing on the recent economic literature on integration and disintegration processes. The basic element is the existence of a trade-off between the benefits of centralisation and the costs of harmonising policies in presence of heterogeneous preferences among countries. The approach we follow is that of the recent literature on the political economy of international unions and the unification or break-up of nations (Bolton and Roland 1997, Alesina and Wacziarg 1999, Alesina et al. 2001, 2005a, to mention only the relevant). The general perspective is that unification provides returns to scale in the provision of public goods, but reduces each member state’s ability to determine its most favoured bundle of public goods. In the simple model presented in Chapter 2, support for membership of the union is increasing in the union’s average income and in the loss of efficiency stemming from being outside the union, and decreasing in a country’s average income, while increasing heterogeneity of preferences among countries points to a reduced scope of the union. Afterwards we empirically test the model with data on the EU; more precisely, we perform an econometric analysis employing a panel of member countries over time. The second part of Chapter 2 thus tries to answer the following question: does public opinion support for the EU really depend on economic factors? The findings are broadly consistent with our theoretical expectations: the conditions of the national economy, differences in income among member states and heterogeneity of preferences shape citizens’ attitude towards their country’s membership of the EU. Consequently, this analysis offers some interesting policy implications for the present debate about ratification of the European Constitution and, more generally, about how the EU could act in order to gain more support from the European public. Citizens in many member states are called to express their opinion in national referenda, which may well end up in rejection of the Constitution, as recently happened in France and the Netherlands, triggering a European-wide political crisis. These events show that nowadays understanding public attitude towards the EU is not only of academic interest, but has a strong relevance for policy-making too. Chapter 3 empirically investigates the link between European integration and regional autonomy in Italy. Over the last few decades, the double tendency towards supranationalism and regional autonomy, which has characterised some European States, has taken a very interesting form in this country, because Italy, besides being one of the founding members of the EU, also implemented a process of decentralisation during the 1970s, further strengthened by a constitutional reform in 2001. Moreover, the issue of the allocation of competences among the EU, the Member States and the regions is now especially topical. The process leading to the drafting of European Constitution (even if then it has not come into force) has attracted much attention from a constitutional political economy perspective both on a normative and positive point of view (Breuss and Eller 2004, Mueller 2005). The Italian parliament has recently passed a new thorough constitutional reform, still to be approved by citizens in a referendum, which includes, among other things, the so called “devolution”, i.e. granting the regions exclusive competence in public health care, education and local police. Following and extending the methodology proposed in a recent influential article by Alesina et al. (2005b), which only concentrated on the EU activity (treaties, legislation, and European Court of Justice’s rulings), we develop a set of quantitative indicators measuring the intensity of the legislative activity of the Italian State, the EU and the Italian regions from 1973 to 2005 in a large number of policy categories. By doing so, we seek to answer the following broad questions. Are European and regional legislations substitutes for state laws? To what extent are the competences attributed by the European treaties or the Italian Constitution actually exerted in the various policy areas? Is their exertion consistent with the normative recommendations from the economic literature about their optimum allocation among different levels of government? The main results show that, first, there seems to be a certain substitutability between EU and national legislations (even if not a very strong one), but not between regional and national ones. Second, the EU concentrates its legislative activity mainly in international trade and agriculture, whilst social policy is where the regions and the State (which is also the main actor in foreign policy) are more active. Third, at least two levels of government (in some cases all of them) are significantly involved in the legislative activity in many sectors, even where the rationale for that is, at best, very questionable, indicating that they actually share a larger number of policy tasks than that suggested by the economic theory. It appears therefore that an excessive number of competences are actually shared among different levels of government. From an economic perspective, it may well be recommended that some competences be shared, but only when the balance between scale or spillover effects and heterogeneity of preferences suggests so. When, on the contrary, too many levels of government are involved in a certain policy area, the distinction between their different responsibilities easily becomes unnecessarily blurred. This may not only leads to a slower and inefficient policy-making process, but also risks to make it too complicate to understand for citizens, who, on the contrary, should be able to know who is really responsible for a certain policy when they vote in national,local or European elections or in referenda on national or European constitutional issues.

The shaping of foreign policy: Vietnamese grand strategy after the Cold War

This study examines the case of Vietnam and uses the method of process tracing to explore the sources of foreign policy choice and change. Foreign policy is derived from grand strategy, which refers to the full package of a state’s domestic and foreign policies. I argue that a state’s grand strategy results from the interaction of four factors—its society’s historical experience, social motivation, international power, and political contest among domestic groups. Grand strategies emerge as a response to perceived shifts in the balance of international economic, political, and military power. However, this is not to say that international pressures and incentives are translated into foreign policy. Rather, pressures and incentives are given meaning by worldviews, which reflect a society’s historical experiences of its place in the international system at traumatic junctures of its encounter with the outside world. Strategic changes in foreign policy follow what I call the “strategic algorithm,” which incorporates four major mechanisms—balancing against threat, bandwagoning with power, learning, and survival by transformation. This case study generates hypotheses for a theory of strategic choice, a theory of foreign policy transformation, and a theory of grand strategy emergence.

Los condicionantes internos de la política exterior

El trabajo tiene por objeto, en primera instancia, reconocer y diferenciar los presupuestos epistemológicos que proporcionó el pos estructuralismo y los efectos que estos tienen sobre las Relaciones Internacionales. En segundo lugar, remarcar el correlato que los primeros tienen con una revisión ontológica de lo "político". Finalmente, a partir de una sintética consideración sobre qué es política exterior, plantear la necesidad de adecuación de su estudio de cara a los interrogantes planteados por una nueva visión paradigmática.

Reflexiones para el estudio de los estudios internacionales

El trabajo tiene por objeto un intento de vigilancia epistemológica sobre la teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales como constitutiva de la realidad más que como explicativa de la misma y en ese sentido, como construcción de sentido que vela un claro predominio de determinados enfoques en detrimento de otros, o incluso marginándolos, que sustentan prácticas a través del cual se ejerce la dominación.

Constructivismo : de clasificaciones y categorías

El objetivo de este estudio es analizar brevemente la incorporación y el desarrollo del enfoque constructivista de las Relaciones Internacionales y la manera en que este ha sido categorizado desde los años 1990 en adelante. Partiendo del supuesto por el que es posible considerar que el constructivismo no es una categoría analítica homogénea, por el contrario, es posible identificar distintas versiones de este modelo de razonamiento, se intentará analizar la pertinencia de los diversos intentos de categorizar el constructivismo. A partir de ello, el propósito se centrará en los efectos que tales categorizaciones tienen para el estudio de las Relaciones Internacionales.

Reflexión : punto de partida para la anti naturalización

Las cuestiones y doctrinas científicas estudiadas deben servir de instrumentos para el análisis y la reflexión, nunca constituir fines en sí mismos, ni doctrinas de salvación (no se adhiere a una teoría como a una religión). La lectura de Morgenthau o Aron, Rosencrance o Kaplan, Keohane o Kratochwill por citar algunos, debe permitir "ver" mejor, ya sea aspectos de la práctica científica, ya sean sus dimensiones éticas o políticas. Ello porque pasa de las cuestiones epistemológicas a las ético-políticas, y viceversa, casi sin solución de continuidad. El propósito de este artículo es reflexionar sobre ciertos supuestos que han naturalizado el conocimiento en las Relaciones Internacionales.

El rol del Parlamento en la política exterior : Instrumentos analíticos para su estudio

El siguiente trabajo tiene por objeto una aproximación a los instrumentos analíticos que servirían de marco para el abordaje del rol del Parlamento en la conformación de la política exterior como objeto de estudio. El mismo propone la complementación teórica como punto de partida para el abordaje e identificación de dimensiones que no siendo propiedad exclusiva de dicho objeto permiten comprenderlo en profundidad.

Una revisión epistemológica de la autonomía

La noción de autonomía ha sido uno de los mayores puntos de tensión teórica del análisis de la política exterior argentina. En este artículo se plantea una revisión etimológica, epistemológica y metodológica de dicha noción con el fin de mostrar la complejidad conceptual de esta discusión y orientar las decisiones prácticas que, derivado de este asunto, pudieran tomarse. Para ello se revisa la relación entre teoría y método, el concepto como basamento de una estructura teórica y las propiedades del mismo. Posteriormente se presenta el origen etimológico de la noción de autonomía y se exponen algunas de las concepciones filosóficas más influyentes de la modernidad occidental para, finalmente, exponer su articulación en el ámbito de las Relaciones Internacionales.

Un ensayo sobre la autonomía

La noción de autonomía ha sido uno de los mayores puntos de tensión teórica del análisis de la política exterior argentina. En este artículo se plantea una revisión etimológica, epistemológica y metodológica de dicha noción con el fin de mostrar la complejidad conceptual de esta discusión y orientar las decisiones prácticas que, derivado de este asunto, pudieran tomarse. Para ello se revisa la relación entre teoría y método, el concepto como basamento de una estructura teórica y las propiedades del mismo. Posteriormente se presenta el origen etimológico de la noción de autonomía y se exponen algunas de las concepciones filosóficas más influyentes de la modernidad occidental para, finalmente, exponer su articulación en el ámbito de las Relaciones Internacionales.

Presupuestos del análisis cualitativo para el estudio de la toma de decisiones

Se toma como punto de partida el modelo de diseño de investigación cualitativa desarrollado por Joseph Maxwell, cuya concepción sobre el diseño de una investigación es el de una estructura subyacente basada en la interconexión de los componentes del estudio y las implicancias que estos tienen sobre otros, para analizar, si es posible, la corriente neorrealista, considerada como la escuela predominante en el estudio de las relaciones internacionales. El propósito de este trabajo -sustentado en el paradigma interpretativo, que conlleva como supuesto fundacional la necesaria comprensión del sentido de la acción social en el contexto del mundo de la vida y desde la perspectiva de los participantes- es el de relevar el aporte testimonial de quienes han conducido o participado activamente, es decir, los Ministros de Relaciones Exteriores, en la formación de la política exterior del país a partir de la vuelta de la democracia.