To promote the defense of the United States. Hearings before the Committee on foreign relations, United States Senate, Seventy-seventh Congress, first session, on S. 275, a bill further to promote the defense of the United States, and for other purposes...

Mode of access: Internet.

Control and reduction of armaments : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Eighty-fourth Congress, second session [-Eighty-fifth Congress, second session].

Includes index (pt.[18]).

Mutual defense assistance program, 1950 : hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Eighty-first Congress, second session, on the mutual defense assistance program, 1950. June 2, 5, 6, 15, 1950.

Mode of access: Internet.

Reported foreign and domestic covert activities of the United States Central Intelligence Agency, 1950-1974 /

"February 18, 1975."

Conciliation act of 1941. Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, United States Senate, Seventy-seventh Congress, first session, on S. 683, a bill to expedite the national-defense program by providing a method for the settlement of labor disputes in defense industries without resort to hasty strikes and lock-outs, May 6 to 29, 1941.

Lister Hill, chairman of subcommittee.

Third supplemental national defense appropriation bill for 1942 : hearings before the subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Seventy-seventh Congress, first session on H.R. 6159, a bill making supplemental appropriations for the national defense for the fiscal years ending June 30, 1942, and June 30, 1943, and for other purposes.

Kenneth McKellar, chairman.

Establishment of a national glider program : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, United States Senate, Seventy-seventh Congress, first session, on S.1749, a bill to promote the national defense and preparedness through the creation of a vast reservoir of potential airplane pilots and mechanics, and for other purposes. September 30; October 1, 7, and 8, 1941.

Elbert D. Thomas, chairman.

Nomination of William D. Ruckelshaus : hearings before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, first session, on the nomination of William D. Ruckelshaus, to be Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, May 3, 4, and 5, 1983.

Includes bibliographical references.

Nomination of Stephen J. Gage : hearing before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, second session, on the nomination of Stephen J. Gage to be assistant administrator for Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, January 24, 1978.

"Serial no. 95-H45."

Department of Energy's facilities for defense materials production : hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, on the public health and safety and environmental aspects of operation ... July 17, 1987.

Pt. 2 has subtitle: Hearings before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, on the status of the Department of Energy's effects to address issues concerning the defense materials production reactors ... October 27 and 29, 1987.

Department of Defense authorization for appropriations for fiscal years 1990 and 1991 : hearings before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, first session, on S. 1085 ...

Item 1034-A, 1034-B (MF).

Wartime health and education : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, United States Senate, Seventy-eighth Congress, first session, pursuant to S. Res. 74, a resolution authorizing an investigation of the educational and physical fitness of the civilian population as related to national defense.

Claude Pepper, chairman of subcommittee.

Bike share's impact on car use : evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia

There are currently more than 400 cities operating bike share programs. Purported benefits of bike share programs include flexible mobility, physical activity, reduced congestion, emissions and fuel use. Implicit or explicit in the calculation of program benefits are assumptions regarding the modes of travel replaced by bike share journeys. This paper examines the degree to which car trips are replaced by bike share, through an examination of survey and trip data from bike share programs in Melbourne, Brisbane, Washing, D.C., London, and Minneapolis/St. Paul. A secondary and unique component of this analysis examines motor vehicle support services required for bike share fleet rebalancing and maintenance. These two components are then combined to estimate bike share’s overall contribution to changes in vehicle kilometres traveled. The results indicate that the estimated mean reduction in car use due to bike share is at least twice the distance covered by operator support vehicles, with the exception of London, in which the relationship is reversed, largely due to a low car mode substitution rate. As bike share programs mature, evaluation of their effectiveness in reducing car use may become increasingly important. This paper reveals that by increasing the convenience of bike share relative to car use and by improving perceptions of safety, the capacity of bike share programs to reduce vehicle trips and yield overall net benefits will be enhanced. Researchers can adapt the analytical approach proposed in this paper to assist in the evaluation of current and future bike share programs.

Air navigation services in Australia and the United States : a comparative case study

The central document governing the global organization of Air Navigation Services (ANS) is the Convention on International Civil Aviation, commonly referred to as the “Chicago Convention,” whose original version was signed in that city in 1944. In the Convention, Contracting States agreed to ensure the minimum standards of ANS established by ICAO, a specialized United Nations agency created by the Convention. Emanating from obligations under the Chicago Convention, ANS has traditionally provided by departments of national governments. However, there is a widespread trend toward transferring delivery of ANS services outside of line departments of national governments to independent agencies or corporations. The Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation (CANSO), which is the trade association for independent ANS providers, currently counts approximately 60 members, and is steadily growing. However, whatever delivery mechanisms are chosen, national governments remain ultimately responsible for ensuring that adequate ANS services are available. The provision by governments of ANS reflects the responsibility of the state for safety, international relations, and indirectly, the macroeconomic benefits of ensuring a sound infrastructure for aviation. ANS is a “public good” and an “essential good” provided to all aircraft using a country’s airfields and airspace. However, ANS also represents a service that directly benefits only a limited number of users, notably aircraft owners and operators. The idea that the users of the system, rather than the taxpaying public, should incur the costs associated with ANS provision is inherent in the commercialization process. However, ICAO sets out broad principles for the establishment of user charges, which member states are expected to comply with. ICAO states that only distance flown and aircraft weights are acceptable parameters for use in a charging system. These two factors are considered to be easy to measure, bear a reasonable relationship to the value of service received, and do not discriminate due to factors such as where the flight originated or the nation of aircraft registration.

Bike share's impact on car use : evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia

There are currently more than 700 cities operating bike share programs. Purported benefits of bike share include flexible mobility, physical activity, reduced congestion, emissions and fuel use. Implicit or explicit in the calculation of program benefits are assumptions regarding the modes of travel replaced by bike share journeys. This paper examines the degree to which car trips are replaced by bike share, through an examination of survey and trip data from bike share programs in Melbourne, Brisbane, Washington, D.C., London, and Minneapolis/St. Paul. A secondary and unique component of this analysis examines motor vehicle support services required for bike share fleet rebalancing and maintenance. These two components are then combined to estimate bike share’s overall contribution to changes in vehicle kilometers traveled. The results indicate an estimated reduction in motor vehicle use due to bike share of approx. 90,000 km per annum in Melbourne and Minneapolis/St. Paul and 243,291 km for Washington, D.C. London’s bike share program however recorded an additional 766,341 km in motor vehicle use. This was largely due to a low car mode substitution rate and substantial truck use for rebalancing of bicycles. As bike share programs mature, evaluation of their effectiveness in reducing car use may become increasingly important. Researchers can adapt the analytical approach proposed in this paper to assist in the evaluation of current and future bike share programs.