Air navigation services in Australia and the United States : a comparative case study


Autoria(s): Zolin, R.; Lewis, I
Data(s)

2014

Resumo

The central document governing the global organization of Air Navigation Services (ANS) is the Convention on International Civil Aviation, commonly referred to as the “Chicago Convention,” whose original version was signed in that city in 1944. In the Convention, Contracting States agreed to ensure the minimum standards of ANS established by ICAO, a specialized United Nations agency created by the Convention. Emanating from obligations under the Chicago Convention, ANS has traditionally provided by departments of national governments. However, there is a widespread trend toward transferring delivery of ANS services outside of line departments of national governments to independent agencies or corporations. The Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation (CANSO), which is the trade association for independent ANS providers, currently counts approximately 60 members, and is steadily growing. However, whatever delivery mechanisms are chosen, national governments remain ultimately responsible for ensuring that adequate ANS services are available. The provision by governments of ANS reflects the responsibility of the state for safety, international relations, and indirectly, the macroeconomic benefits of ensuring a sound infrastructure for aviation. ANS is a “public good” and an “essential good” provided to all aircraft using a country’s airfields and airspace. However, ANS also represents a service that directly benefits only a limited number of users, notably aircraft owners and operators. The idea that the users of the system, rather than the taxpaying public, should incur the costs associated with ANS provision is inherent in the commercialization process. However, ICAO sets out broad principles for the establishment of user charges, which member states are expected to comply with. ICAO states that only distance flown and aircraft weights are acceptable parameters for use in a charging system. These two factors are considered to be easy to measure, bear a reasonable relationship to the value of service received, and do not discriminate due to factors such as where the flight originated or the nation of aircraft registration.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/69456/

Publicador

Macrothink Institute

Relação

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/69456/2/69456.pdf

http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/csbm/index

DOI:10.5296/csbm.v1i1.5312

Zolin, R. & Lewis, I (2014) Air navigation services in Australia and the United States : a comparative case study. Case Studies in Business and Management, 1(1), pp. 64-74.

Direitos

Copyright 2014 The Author(s)

Fonte

Australian Centre for Entrepreneurship; QUT Business School; School of Management

Palavras-Chave #160500 POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION #Air Navigation Services #Australia #United States #Case Study
Tipo

Journal Article