S. aureus bacteraemia surveillance quarterly report: October-December 2010

This quarterly report provides epidemiological data on�S. aureus�in Northern Ireland, including overall infection�figures as well as those specific to MRSA and MSSA. The report highlights key points, rates, trends and statistical process control charts. The report also provides information on surveillance methods and data for each hospital and Health and Social Care Trust in Northern Ireland.

C. difficile and S. aureus quarterly reports

C.difficle surveillance report quarter July-September 2015 .pdf C.difficle surveillance report quarter April-June 2015.pdf C.difficle surveillance report quarter January - March 2015.pdf C.difficle surveillance report quarter ending Oct - Dec 2014.pdf C.difficle surveillance report quarter ending July - Sept 2014.pdf C.difficle sureillance report quarter ending April - June 2014.pdf C.difficle surveillance report quarter endin January - March 2014.pdf C.difficle surveillance report quarter ending October to December 2013.pdf C.difficle surveillance report quarter ending 1st July 2013 to 30th September 2013.pdf C.difficle surveillance report quarter ending 1 April 2013 to 30 June 2013.pdf C.difficle Surveillance Report Quarter Ending 31st March 2013.pdf.pdf C.difficle Surveillance Report Quarter Ending 31st December 2012.pdf C.difficile Surveillance Report quarter ending 30 September 2012.pdf.pdf� C.difficile Surveillance Report quarter ending 30 June 2012.pdf C.difficile Surveillance Report quarter ending March 2012 C.difficile Surveillance Report quarter ending December 2011 C.difficile Surveillance Report quarter ending September 2011.pdf C. difficle Surveillance Report quarter ending June 2011.pdf C. difficile Surveillance Report quarter ending March 2011 (930KB).pdf CDI_Report Oct-Dec 2010_2.pdf Staphylococcus aureus S.aureus bacteraemia surveillance quart July-September 2015.pdf S.aureus surveillance report quarter April-June 2015.pdf S.aureus surveillance report quarter January - March 2015.pdf S.aureus surveillance report quarter Oct - Dec 2014.pdf S.aureus sureveillance report quarter July - Sept 2014.pdf S.aureus surveillance report quarter April - June 2014.pdf S. aureus surveillance report quarter January - March 2014.pdf S. aureus surveillance report quarter ending October to December 2013.pdf S. aureus surveillance report quarter ending 1st July 2013 to 30th September 2013.pdf S. aureus surveillance report quarter ending 1 April 2013 to 30 June 2013 S.aureus Surveillance Report Quarter Ending 31st March 2013.pdf.pdf S.aureus Surveillance Report Quarter Ending 31st December 2012.pdf S.aureus Surveillance Report quarter ending 30 September 2012.pdf.pdf S.aureus Surveillance Report quarter ending 30 June 2012.pdf S.aureus Surveillance Report quarter ending March 2012 S.aureus Surveillance Report quarter ending�December 2011 S.aureus Surveillance Report quarter ending September 2011.pdf S.aureus Surveillance Report quarter ending June 2011.pdf S.aureus Surveillance Report quarter ending March 2011 (999KB).pdf Surgical site infectionCumulative incidence of SSI within 30 days after Caesarean section, Reporting Year 2009 (post-discharge excluded) Cumulative incidence of SSI within 30 days after hip prosthesis, Reporting Year 2009 (post-discharge excluded) Cumulative incidence of SSI within 30 days after knee prosthesis, Reporting Year 2009 (post-discharge excluded) � �

C. difficile and S.aureus bacteraemia surveillance quarterly reports

Quarterly reports provide epidemiological data on�C. difficile and S. aureus�in Northern Ireland. The report highlights key points, rates, trends and statistical process control charts. The report also provides information on surveillance methods and data for each hospital and Health and Social Care Trust in Northern Ireland.Click here to see the latest reports

Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

The MRSA-Screen test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), consisting of a slide latex agglutination kit that detects PBP 2a with a monoclonal antibody, was blindly compared to the oxacillin disk diffusion test, the oxacillin-salt agar screen, and PCR of the mecA gene for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 120 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 80 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates, defined by the absence or presence of the mecA gene, respectively, were tested. The MRSA-Screen test, the oxacillin disk diffusion test, and the oxacillin-salt agar screening test showed sensitivities of 100, 61.3, and 82.5% and specificities of 99.2, 96.7, and 98.3%, respectively. We conclude that the MRSA-Screen is a very accurate, reliable, and fast test (15 min) for differentiation of MRSA from MSSA colonies on agar plates.

S. aureus surveillance quarterly report: April-June 2015

S. aureus surveillance quarterly report: April-June 2015

Environnements présentant un risque nouveau de contamination des travailleurs par des souches de Staphylococcus aureus résistantes à la méthicilline

L'exposition aux bactéries résistantes aux antibiotiques, en particulier à Staphylococcus aureus résistant à la méthicilline (SARM (1)) sur le lieu de travail, a été montrée comme étant un facteur de risque pour la santé des opérateurs, la fréquence des contacts avec cette bactérie augmentant la probabilité d'en devenir porteur. En plus du fait que les SARM augmentent d'un facteur 4 le risque d'infection chez le porteur, le choix du traitement antibiotique en cas d'infection est fortement limité. C'est pourquoi il est important d'identifier les environnements de travail et les conditions qui favorisent la transmission de cette bactérie de l'animal à l'Homme. La résistance à la méthicilline est conférée au S. aureus par un élément génétique mobile, appelé « staphylococcal cassette chromosome » mec (SCCmec), qui contient le gène de résistance à la méthicilline, mecA. SCCmec a cinq formes (I, II, III, IV and V) qui ont été acquises et intégrées dans le génome de S. aureus lors d'événements indépendants de transfert horizontal. Certaines de ces lignées spécifiquement associées au bétail traité aux antibiotiques (tel que le complexe clonal 398, CC398 (2)), peuvent également coloniser le nez humain. Ainsi, la colonisation nasale ou contamination a été constatée chez 23 à 86 % des agriculteurs et vétérinaires ayant un contact direct avec des porcs, ainsi que chez un à cinq pour cent des personnes ayant une exposition indirecte (par exemple les membres de la famille d'agriculteurs, les visiteurs de la ferme). La pathogénicité du SARM CC398 pour l'Homme a été documentée dans une série de rapports décrivant des cas d'endocardite, d'otomastoïdite et de pneumonie. En outre, le SARM CC398 a été introduit dans des structures de santé (hôpitaux, cliniques, etc.) situées principalement dans les zones d'élevage à forte densité. Si les porcs sont des vecteurs bien connus de transmission de CC398 à l'Homme, d'autres animaux peuvent l'être également, tels que les dindes en Allemagne, comme illustré par le premier article cité dans cette note. Par ailleurs, la propagation de ces souches résistantes aux antibiotiques est inquiétante. Le deuxième article de cette note révèle l'apparition de souches de CC398 dans le lait de vache au Royaume-Uni pays où, jusqu'alors, la surveillance n'en avait pas détecté.

S. aureus surveillance quarterly report: July-September 2015

S. aureus surveillance quarterly report: July-September 2015

The presence of qacA/B gene in Brazilian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

A total of 74 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from three government hospitals in 2002 and 2003 were examined concerning the distribution of qacA/B gene, which is the determinant of resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds largely employed in hospital disinfection. By polymerase chain reaction the qacA/B gene was found in 80% of the isolates, which is a significant result considering it is the first time that qacA/B gene is being reported for Brazilian MRSA strains and it is presented at a high rate.

Necrotising pneumonia due to influenza A (H1N1) and community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA300: successful management of the first documented paediatric case.

Necrotising pneumonia in young, previously healthy patients due to Panton–Valentine leucocidin (PVL) producing Staphylococcus aureus has been increasingly recognised. PVL pneumonia is often associated with influenza co-infection and high mortality. This case report describes the successful management of the first documented paediatric case of a previous healthy adolescent who developed necrotising pneumonia due to community-acquired methicillin-resistant (CA-MRSA) clone USA300 with pandemic influenza A (H1N1) co-infection, and highlights the importance of early recognition and initiation of appropriate therapy for this potentially fatal co-infection. PCR remains the gold standard to diagnose pandemic H1N1 since it may not be detected by rapid antigen tests. Bacterial necrotising pneumonia should be suspected in those presenting with worsening flu-like symptoms and clinical and/or radiological evidence of PVL infection (multifocal infiltrates, effusion and cavitation). These patients may benefit from the administration of toxin neutralising agents. In light of the current H1N1 pandemic, healthcare professionals will be increasingly confronted with this clinical scenario.

Long-Term Control of Endemic Hospital-Wide Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): The Impact of Targeted Active Surveillance for MRSA in Patients and Healthcare Workers

To evaluate the long-term impact of successive interventions on rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization or infection and MRSA bacteremia in an endemic hospital-wide situation. DESIGN:Quasi-experimental, interrupted time-series analysis. The impact of the interventions was analyzed by use of segmented regression. Representative MRSA isolates were typed by use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. SETTING:A 950-bed teaching hospital in Seville, Spain. PATIENTS:All patients admitted to the hospital during the period from 1995 through 2008. METHODS:Three successive interventions were studied: (1) contact precautions, with no active surveillance for MRSA; (2) targeted active surveillance for MRSA in patients and healthcare workers in specific wards, prioritized according to clinical epidemiology data; and (3) targeted active surveillance for MRSA in patients admitted from other medical centers. RESULTS:Neither the preintervention rate of MRSA colonization or infection (0.56 cases per 1,000 patient-days [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.49-0.62 cases per 1,000 patient-days]) nor the slope for the rate of MRSA colonization or infection changed significantly after the first intervention. The rate decreased significantly to 0.28 cases per 1,000 patient-days (95% CI, 0.17-0.40 cases per 1,000 patient-days) after the second intervention and to 0.07 cases per 1,000 patient-days (95% CI, 0.06-0.08 cases per 1,000 patient-days) after the third intervention, and the rate remained at a similar level for 8 years. The MRSA bacteremia rate decreased by 80%, whereas the rate of bacteremia due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus did not change. Eighty-three percent of the MRSA isolates identified were clonally related. All MRSA isolates obtained from healthcare workers were clonally related to those recovered from patients who were in their care. CONCLUSION:Our data indicate that long-term control of endemic MRSA is feasible in tertiary care centers. The use of targeted active surveillance for MRSA in patients and healthcare workers in specific wards (identified by means of analysis of clinical epidemiology data) and the use of decolonization were key to the success of the program.

Colonization with multiple Staphylococcus aureus strains among patients in European intensive care units.

Patients and healthy individuals intermittently and inconsistently carry different methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) subtypes. In the present study, we assessed the clonality of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA strains in patients admitted to 1 of 6 intensive care units (ICUs), using spa typing and multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA).

Acquisition and cross-transmission of Staphylococcus aureus in European intensive care units

Objective. To study the acquisition and cross-transmission of Staphylococcus aureus in different intensive care units (ICUs). Methods. We performed a multicenter cohort study. Six ICUs in 6 countries participated. During a 3-month period at each ICU, all patients had nasal and perineal swab specimens obtained at ICU admission and during their stay. All S. aureus isolates that were collected were genotyped by spa typing and multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis typing for cross-transmission analysis. A total of 629 patients were admitted to ICUs, and 224 of these patients were found to be colonized with S. aureus at least once during ICU stay (22% were found to be colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). A total of 316 patients who had test results negative for S. aureus at ICU admission and had at least 1 follow-up swab sample obtained for culture were eligible for acquisition analysis. Results. A total of 45 patients acquired S. aureus during ICU stay (31 acquired methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA], and 14 acquired MRSA). Several factors that were believed to affect the rate of acquisition of S. aureus were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses, including the amount of hand disinfectant used, colonization pressure, number of beds per nurse, antibiotic use, length of stay, and ICU setting (private room versus open ICU treatment). Greater colonization pressure and a greater number of beds per nurse correlated with a higher rate of acquisition for both MSSA and MRSA. The type of ICU setting was related to MRSA acquisition only, and the amount of hand disinfectant used was related to MSSA acquisition only. In 18 (40%) of the cases of S. aureus acquisition, cross-transmission from another patient was possible. Conclusions. Colonization pressure, the number of beds per nurse, and the treatment of all patients in private rooms correlated with the number of S. aureus acquisitions on an ICU. The amount of hand disinfectant used was correlated with the number of cases of MSSA acquisition but not with the number of cases of MRSA acquisition. The number of cases of patient-to-patient cross-transmission was comparable for MSSA and MRSA.

Contribution of clumping factor B to pathogenesis of experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus.

Staphylococcus aureus Newman with an insertion mutation in clfB, the gene encoding clumping factor B, only marginally decreased infection rate (P>0.05) in rats with experimental endocarditis. In contrast, clfB complementation on a multicopy plasmid significantly increased infectivity (P<0.05) over the deleted mutants. Although clfB could affect endovascular infection, its importance in experimental endocarditis was limited.

Linezolid alone or combined with rifampin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in experimental foreign-body infection.

We investigated the activity of linezolid, alone and in combination with rifampin (rifampicin), against a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain in vitro and in a guinea pig model of foreign-body infection. The MIC, minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) in logarithmic phase, and MBC in stationary growth phase were 2.5, >20, and >20 microg/ml, respectively, for linezolid; 0.01, 0.08, and 2.5 microg/ml, respectively, for rifampin; and 0.16, 0.63, >20 microg/ml, respectively, for levofloxacin. In time-kill studies, bacterial regrowth and the development of rifampin resistance were observed after 24 h with rifampin alone at 1x or 4x the MIC and were prevented by the addition of linezolid. After the administration of single intraperitoneal doses of 25, 50, and 75 mg/kg of body weight, linezolid peak concentrations of 6.8, 12.7, and 18.1 microg/ml, respectively, were achieved in sterile cage fluid at approximately 3 h. The linezolid concentration remained above the MIC of the test organism for 12 h with all doses. Antimicrobial treatments of animals with cage implant infections were given twice daily for 4 days. Linezolid alone at 25, 50, and 75 mg/kg reduced the planktonic bacteria in cage fluid during treatment by 1.2 to 1.7 log(10) CFU/ml; only linezolid at 75 mg/kg prevented bacterial regrowth 5 days after the end of treatment. Linezolid used in combination with rifampin (12.5 mg/kg) was more effective than linezolid used as monotherapy, reducing the planktonic bacteria by >or=3 log(10) CFU (P < 0.05). Efficacy in the eradication of cage-associated infection was achieved only when linezolid was combined with rifampin, with cure rates being between 50% and 60%, whereas the levofloxacin-rifampin combination demonstrated the highest cure rate (91%) against the strain tested. The linezolid-rifampin combination is a treatment option for implant-associated infections caused by quinolone-resistant MRSA.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and PCR-based rapid diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Effective empirical treatment is of paramount importance to improve the outcome of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. We aimed to evaluate a PCR-based rapid diagnosis of methicillin resistance (GeneXpert MRSA) after early detection of S. aureus bacteraemia using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Patients with a first episode of S. aureus bacteraemia identified using MALDI-TOF MS were randomized in a prospective interventional open study between October 2010 and August 2012. In the control group, antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed after MALDI-TOF MS identification on blood culture pellets. In the intervention group, a GeneXpert MRSA was performed after S. aureus identification. The primary outcome was the performance of GeneXpert MRSA directly on blood cultures. We then assessed the impact of early diagnosis of methicillin resistance on the empirical treatment. In all, 197 episodes of S. aureus bacteraemia were included in the study, of which 106 were included in the intervention group. Median time from MALDI-TOF MS identification to GeneXpert MRSA result was 97 min (range 25-250). Detection of methicillin resistance using GeneXpert MRSA had a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 100%. There was less unnecessary coverage of MRSA in the intervention group (17.1% versus 29.2%, p 0.09). GeneXpert MRSA was highly reliable in diagnosing methicillin resistance when performed directly on positive blood cultures. This could help to avoid unnecessary prescriptions of anti-MRSA agents and promote the introduction of earlier adequate coverage in unsuspected cases.