A report of the evidence and points of law, arising in the trial of John Francis Knapp, for the murder of Joseph White, esquire.

Mode of access: Internet.

Review, of the report of the case of the Commonwealth versus David Lee Child, for publishing in the Massachusetts Journal a libel on the honorable John Keyes.

At head of title: (From the Concord (Middlesex) Gazette.).

Trial of Orrin De Wolf for the murder of Wm. Stiles, at Worcester, Jan. 14, 1845, including his confession, showing the natural results of intemperance & licentiousness.

At head of title: Warning to the young!

Reports of cases adjudged in the superior courts of law and equity of the State of North Carolina, from the year 1789, to the year [1806]

"Vol. 2 Haywood contains a number of decisions in the United States Circuit Court, delivered chiefly by Judge Marshall, 1802-1805." - Soule, Lawyer's ref. manual, 1884.

North eastern reporter.

Includes the decisions of the Supreme Courts of Massachusetts, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and Court of Appeals of New York; May/July 1891-Mar./Apr. 1936, Appellate Court of Indiana; Dec. 1926/Feb. 1927-Mar./Apr. 1936, Courts of Appeals of Ohio.

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Al Masri

The case of Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Al Masri examines the legality of the continued, and possibly indefinite, detention of an asylum seeker - in determining whether mandatory detention was in fact 'mandatory', and legally so, the Federal Court had to examine the complexity between statute, the Constitution and fundamental rights and freedoms at stake.

The Wellesley Island decision: Offshore native title post Yarmirr and ward

Casenote on Federal Court decision, The Lardil Peoples v State of Queensland - recognition of non-exclusive native title rights and interests in offshore areas.

Os operadores argumentativos como estratégia linguística e discursiva da argumentação na sentença judicial

We studied in this dissertation the argumentation in the court judgment, which goal was to identify, describe and explain the running of argumentative operators in the argumentative orientation of text and discourse built through the text of the judgment. We support our research in the constructs adopted for the ATD – (Textual Analysis of the Discourses) - Adam (2011), in the studies about the Aristotle’s Rhetoric (1959) and Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996) and other works such as of the Alves (2005), Capez (2008), Charaudeau (2012), Keller and Bastos (2015), Koch (2009; 2011), Rodrigues, Silva Neto and Passeggi (2010), Trubilhano and Henriques (2013). In a methodological way, we made use of deductive-inductive method, because we analyzed the argumentation in an "unknown" text - particular case - based on a theory already known (about language, text and argumentation). About the nature and objectives, our search was characterized as qualitatively and as an explanatory and descriptive investigation, with technical procedures of documental collection of Bibliographic Search. As corpus, we use a court judgment of character condemnatory, issued on September 10, 2014 and taken from the online site of the Federal Court of Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN). The results revealed that the argumentative operators exercised decisive roles in the organization of argumentative strategies of the text and the speech , guiding the announcer to the Desired conclusion by the enunciator. It was also possible to conclude that the use of argumentative operators allowed syllogistic constructions in the form of presentation of the arguments and in the construction of argumentation. In addition, operators like "but", "until", "already", "although" etc. helped to identify in the data's analysis the point of view (PoV) of the enunciator, the expectation break about the previous enunciate and / or the value scale given to the argument. Finally, with the use of argumentative operators the enunciator introduced arguments able to demonstrate/justify a thesis and refute an opposing thesis towards a conclusion sought by the own enunciator.

Os operadores argumentativos como estratégia linguística e discursiva da argumentação na sentença judicial

We studied in this dissertation the argumentation in the court judgment, which goal was to identify, describe and explain the running of argumentative operators in the argumentative orientation of text and discourse built through the text of the judgment. We support our research in the constructs adopted for the ATD – (Textual Analysis of the Discourses) - Adam (2011), in the studies about the Aristotle’s Rhetoric (1959) and Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996) and other works such as of the Alves (2005), Capez (2008), Charaudeau (2012), Keller and Bastos (2015), Koch (2009; 2011), Rodrigues, Silva Neto and Passeggi (2010), Trubilhano and Henriques (2013). In a methodological way, we made use of deductive-inductive method, because we analyzed the argumentation in an "unknown" text - particular case - based on a theory already known (about language, text and argumentation). About the nature and objectives, our search was characterized as qualitatively and as an explanatory and descriptive investigation, with technical procedures of documental collection of Bibliographic Search. As corpus, we use a court judgment of character condemnatory, issued on September 10, 2014 and taken from the online site of the Federal Court of Rio Grande do Norte (JFRN). The results revealed that the argumentative operators exercised decisive roles in the organization of argumentative strategies of the text and the speech , guiding the announcer to the Desired conclusion by the enunciator. It was also possible to conclude that the use of argumentative operators allowed syllogistic constructions in the form of presentation of the arguments and in the construction of argumentation. In addition, operators like "but", "until", "already", "although" etc. helped to identify in the data's analysis the point of view (PoV) of the enunciator, the expectation break about the previous enunciate and / or the value scale given to the argument. Finally, with the use of argumentative operators the enunciator introduced arguments able to demonstrate/justify a thesis and refute an opposing thesis towards a conclusion sought by the own enunciator.

Glosa do postanowienia Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 13 stycznia 2016 r., sygn. akt II GZ 927/15

W glosowanym orzeczeniu Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny stwierdził, że od postanowień wojewódzkich sądów administracyjnych odrzucających skargi z przyczyn formalnych w sprawach wszczętych przed dniem wejścia w życie nowelizacji Prawa o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi (co miało miejsce 15 sierpnia 2015 r.) przysługuje zażalenie, a nie skarga kasacyjna. Przedmiotowe zagadnienie prawne sprowadza się do właściwej wykładni źle sformułowanych przepisów intertemporalnych. W glosie zaprezentowano istotę środków odwoławczych w postępowaniu sądowoadministracyjnym i scharakteryzowano krótko ostatnią nowelizację Prawa o postępowaniu przed sądami administracyjnymi. Autor prezentuje stanowisko krytyczne w stosunku do tezy postanowienia Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego, wskazując, że sąd powinien rozstrzygnąć sprawę co do jej istoty. Pogląd ten został poparty odpowiednią argumentacją z uwzględnieniem konkurencyjnego orzecznictwa Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego.

A (in)capacidade estatal de defesa dos direitos humanos : o incidente de deslocamento de competência nº 3 e a violência policial no estado de Goiás

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Centro de Estudos Avançados Multidisciplinares, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direitos Humanos e Cidadania, 2015.