Cross-border insolvency: Adoption of CLERP 8 as an evolution of Australian insolvency law

In 1997 the United Nations adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and recommended that member states adopt it as part of domestic legislation. In 2002 Australia, an active participant in UNCITRAL's Working Group on Insolvency Law, announced that the next phase of the Commonwealth Government's Corporate Law Economic Reform Program would be a review of cross-border insolvency law. CLERP 8 seeks feedback on the proposed enactment of the Model Law by a separate Commonwealth statute. This article places such a development within the context of Australian cross-border insolvency law as it has evolved from early English bankruptcy legislation through case law arising from the banking collapses of the late 19th century to the more recent jurisprudence produced by corporate collapses of the late 1980s to early 1990s and current high-profile insolvencies.

Process to develop a State Model Law to reduce prescription drug trafficking while protecting pain management

This paper will discuss the intersection of pill mills and the under-treatment of pain, while addressing the unintended consequence that cracking down on pill mills actually has on medical professionals' treatment of legitimate pain in clinical settings. Moreover, the impact each issue has on the spectrum of related policy, regulatory issues and legislation will be analyzed while addressing the national impact on medical care. Lastly, this paper will outline a process to develop a State Model Law on this subject. This process will include suggestions for the future and how we can move forward to adequately address public safety needs and how we can attempt to mitigate the unintended impact prescription drug trafficking has had on a patient's right to appropriate pain management. This balance is achievable and this paper will address ways we can find this elusive balancing point through the development of a State Model Law. ^

A lei aplicável ao processo de arbitragem internacional

This paper is the author’s Master’s Thesis. It aims to study the content of lexarbitri, i.e. the relevant law regarding international arbitration. Under both Portuguese law and UNCITRAL model law, the seat’s legal provisions shall be applied at all times. Contrarily, French and Swiss legislations allow parties and arbitrators to apply any arbitration law to international arbitration, whether the seat law or a foreign arbitration law. There is not a sole understanding towards the criteria to determine the legal provisions that shall govern international arbitration. Traditionally, the lexarbitri would correspond to the arbitration law of the seat of the arbitration. The territorialist criteria remains in force under the majority of arbitration laws that the author has consulted. However, it has been criticized by several authorities in international arbitration, who suggest that the arbitration shall be governed by the law of the seat or of the place in which the award is to be enforcement, whichever better grants its enforcement – the cumulative doctrine; or the arbitration shall be governed by a set of provisions that make up the autonomous transnational legal, regardless of the legal provisions of the law of the seat – the transnational doctrine. The author intends to debate the three mentioned understandings regarding the lexarbitriand further explains why the territorialist criteria is the most adequate to the characteristics and demands of international arbitration, to the governing instruments in force and to the need for a useful award.

A lei aplicável ao processo de arbitragem internacional

This paper is the author’s Master’s Thesis. It aims to study the content of lexarbitri, i.e. the relevant law regarding international arbitration. Under both Portuguese law and UNCITRAL model law, the seat’s legal provisions shall be applied at all times. Contrarily, French and Swiss legislations allow parties and arbitrators to apply any arbitration law to international arbitration, whether the seat law or a foreign arbitration law. There is not a sole understanding towards the criteria to determine the legal provisions that shall govern international arbitration. Traditionally, the lexarbitri would correspond to the arbitration law of the seat of the arbitration. The territorialistcriteria remains in force under the majority of arbitration laws that the author has consulted.However, it has been criticized by several authorities in international arbitration, who suggest that the arbitration shall be governed by the law of the seat or of the place in which the award is to be enforcement, whichever better grants its enforcement – the cumulative doctrine; or the arbitration shall be governed by a set of provisions that make up the autonomous transnational legal, regardless of the legal provisions of the law of the seat – the transnational doctrine. The author intends to debate the three mentioned understandings regarding the lexarbitriand further explains why the territorialist criteria is the most adequate to the characteristics and demands of international arbitration, to the governing instruments in force and to the need for a useful award.

L'intervention du juge canadien avant et durant un arbitrage commercial international

"Thèse présentée à la Faculté des études supérieures de l'Université de Montréal en vue de l'obtention du grade de Docteur en droit (LL.D.) et à l'Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris II) Droit-économie-Sciences Sociales en vue de l'obtention du grade de Docteur en droit (Arrêté du 30 mars 1992 modifié par l'arrêté du 25 avril 2002)"

Le consentement à la convention d'arbitrage commercial international : évolution et développement récents en droit québécois et en droit international

"Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures en vue de l'obtention du grade de LL.M. en droit option droit des affaires"

La faillite internationale: droit comparé, le système canadien et le système européen

La faillite internationale est une matière complexe qui a donné lieu à un long et vif débat doctrinal entre les tenants des systèmes de la territorialité et de l'universalité. Une faillite est internationale lorsqu'elle met en présence un débiteur possédant des biens ou des créanciers dans plus d'un pays. Puisque la matière de faillite est souvent très différente d'un pays à l'autre, l'application du système de la pluralité, retenue dans la plupart des pays, soulève plusieurs problèmes particulièrement en ce qui concerne la coordination entre les diverses faillites et le manque de protection des créanciers, notamment parce qu'elle accorde des effets limités à la reconnaissance des procédures de faillite étrangères. En effet, en présence de procédures de faillite concurrentes il s'agit de répondre aux questions suivantes: quelle est la juridiction compétente pour ouvrir et organiser la faillite? Quelle est la loi applicable? Dans quels États cette faillite va-t-elle produire des effets? Dans le présent mémoire, il s'agit d'établir une comparaison entre le système canadien et le système européen en matière de faillite internationale. Le législateur canadien a récemment envisagé de modifier sa législation sur la faillite pour permettre une meilleure coopération internationale en matière de faillite internationale. Le projet canadien C-55 reprend pour l'essentiel les dispositions contenues dans la loi-type de la commission des Nations-Unis pour le droit commercial international (CNUDCI) sur «l'insolvabilité internationale». Ainsi, il permet de faciliter réellement la reconnaissance des décisions de faillite étrangères, il accorde une plus grande portée aux effets de cette reconnaissance et il prévoit une coordination des procédures multiples en établissant une «hiérarchisation» des procédures de faillite relativement semblable au système européen. Cependant, le projet canadien atteint moins bien l'objectif d'universalité que le Règlement européen 1346/2000 au niveau du traitement égalitaire entre les créanciers locaux et les créanciers étrangers. Si la loi-type offre à tous les États une utilité pratique considérable pour les nombreux cas de coopération internationale, l'harmonisation de la faillite internationale dépendra de son adoption dans les différentes législations. Bien que plusieurs pays aient inséré ce modèle dans leur législation sur la faillite, il n'est pas encore possible, à l'heure actuelle, de parler d'un droit international de la faillite.

Le procedure concorsuali nell'ambito del trasporto marittimo internazionale

La presente trattazione affronta le principali problematiche giuridiche derivanti dall’apertura di una procedura concorsuale, esaminando le questioni di maggiore rilievo giuridico e operativo per il settore del trasporto marittimo in base ai due sistemi che, a livello sovranazionale, regolano l’insolvenza transfrontaliera, i.e. quello ispirato alla UNCITRAL Model Law e il Regolamento UE 848/2015. Le cornici normative UNCITRAL e UE hanno rappresentato, quindi, il punto di partenza dello scrutinio delle possibili aree di conflitto tra il trasporto marittimo e le procedure di insolvenza: sono emerse numerose zone di potenziale collisione, soprattutto in relazione ai criteri di collegamento tipici della navigazione (in primis, la bandiera quale elemento distintivo della nazionalità della nave) e, dunque, all’individuazione del centro degli interessi principali del debitore/armatore, soprattutto se – come di fatto avviene frequentemente in ambito internazionale – organizzato sotto forma di shipping group. Il secondo capitolo è dedicato, in senso lato, ai privilegi marittimi e al loro rapporto con le procedure di insolvenza, con precipuo riferimento all’ipoteca navale e ai maritime liens. A tale proposito, sono analizzate le principali problematiche correlate all’attuazione dei privilegi marittimi, segnatamente in relazione all’istituto del sequestro di nave di cui alla Convenzione di Bruxelles del 1952 nel contesto dell’insolvenza transfrontaliera. Il terzo e ultimo capitolo è dedicato alla limitazione di responsabilità quale istituto tipico del settore di riferimento, dalla prospettiva delle possibili interferenze tra la costituzione dei fondi di cui alle Convenzioni LLMC e CLC ed eventuali procedimenti concorsuali. La ricerca svolta ha dimostrato che l’universalità a cui ambiscono il Regolamento 848/2015 (già 1346/2000) e il sistema UNCITRAL risulta minata dalla coesistenza di una molteplicità di differenti interpretazioni e implementazioni, tali per cui l’insolvenza transfrontaliera delle compagnie di trasporto marittimo non risulta regolata in maniera uniforme, con conseguente possibilità di diverso trattamento di fattispecie e situazioni analoghe.

La conclusione del contratto informatico nella contrattazione internazionale

Nel corso del presente studio si è cercato di capire quale potesse essere la normativa applicabile ai vari tipi di contratto elettronici analizzati, sia dal punto di vista del diverso modello contrattuale e sia dal punto di vista del soggetto, come parte del contratto. Infatti, proprio la peculiare logica delle norme poste a tutela del consumatore giustifica un separato approfondimento degli aspetti riguardanti i contratti conclusi tra operatori professionali, contratti business to business e quelli di cui sia parte un consumatore, contratti business to consumer. Sulla base di questi aspetti soggettivi e contrattuali, è stata analizzate la normativa comunitaria di riferimento, dal regolamento n. 44 del 2001 alla direttiva comunitaria 2000/31/CE. Si sono affrontati anche gli aspetti relativi alle norme di derivazione Uncitral, dalla Model Law del 1996 alla Convenzione del 2005 sulle comunicazioni elettroniche nella contrattazione internazionale, le norme di soft law, dalla Nuova lex mercatoria ai Principi Unidroit alle Linee Guida OCSE e la loro interazione con il commercio elettronico. In seguito, si è analizzata la convenzione di Roma sulle obbligazioni contrattuali e il regolamento Roma I, le loro differenze e la loro diretta applicabilità, se esiste, con il commercio elettronico. In particolare, il Regolamento Roma I ha, nella maggior parte delle sue disposizioni, riproposto quanto contenuto nella convenzione di Roma, però in chiave moderna, apportando delle innovazioni nel commercio elettronico internazionale.

Réglementation des technologies de l'information au Québec : la philosophie du projet de loi 161 en regard du droit canadien

Échange automatisé de messages préprogrammés, communication par courrier électronique, gestion électronique de documents (GED), Data warehouse, EDI… Le monde des affaires vibre depuis quelques années au rythme des nouvelles technologies de l’information. Le droit commercial lui, a du mal à emboîter le pas. Pourtant, les problèmes juridiques soulevés par ce règne de l’immatériel sont majeurs et les incertitudes, grandissantes. La mobilité accrue que permettent ces techniques modernes de transmission et de gestion des informations suggère une solution concertée, qui plus est, tiendra compte de l’évolution hâtée dans ce domaine. Le fondement en a été donné à travers la Loi type des Nations unies sur le commerce électronique en 1996. Plusieurs législations l’ont choisi comme modèle. La législation canadienne est de celles-ci, avec notamment sa Loi uniforme sur le commerce électronique adoptée par la Conférence pour l’harmonisation des lois au Canada en 1999. La législation québécoise aussi a suivi le mouvement. Le 16 juin 2000, un avant-projet de loi portant sur la normalisation juridique des technologies de l’information fut déposé devant l’Assemblée nationale. Cet avant-projet de loi est devenu projet de loi 161, Loi concernant le cadre juridique des technologies de l’information. Mais au-delà des apparences, le législateur québécois semble s’être écarté de la philosophie qui a influencé la Loi type et, conséquemment, la Loi uniforme. Si cette remarque est vérifiée, il faudra craindre l’isolement du Québec et, par ricochet, un positionnement peu concurrentiel dans le commerce international.

Jalons pour un cadre de référence OHADA en droit des contrats.

Le droit des contrats est reconnu comme étant la charnière juridique des activités économiques. Ceci explique, entre autres, l’engouement des organisations supranationales européennes, nord-américaines et asiatiques pour son harmonisation. L’Afrique de l’OHADA n’est pas restée en marge de ce phénomène juridique notamment avec l’avant-projet d’Acte uniforme sur le droit des contrats. Partant de cet avant-projet, véritable décalque des principes d’UNIDROIT, mais sans s’y limiter, l’auteur pose les jalons d’un cadre de référence africain pour un droit des contrats. Cette construction passe d’abord par l’identification des enjeux posés par ce corpus contractuel à vocation panafricaine. Ces enjeux sont à la fois théoriques et pratiques, économiques, juridiques, et extra-juridiques. Sur la base des enjeux ainsi cernés, l’auteur s’emploie à faire des orientations fondamentales au législateur africain de l’OHADA et aux parties contractantes. Il se base ensuite sur ces orientations pour proposer des amendements aux piliers contractuels contemporains en les rapprochant des spécificités contractuelles africaines précisées. Le cadre de référence ainsi esquissé, est enfin confronté à la pratique des expériences européennes et nord-américaines existantes afin d’en apprécier la pertinence pour le bénéfice du commerce transfrontalier africain.

A (des)necessidade do conceito de capital social no direito societário brasileiro: uma análise à luz do direito norte-americano e europeu

O trabalho analisa o tema do capital social no direito societário brasileiro. Seu objetivo é demonstrar, do ponto de vista jurídico, os malefícios e benefícios que o instituto promove. Apesar de ser tido como um conceito clássico e essencial para as sociedades com limitação de responsabilidade no Brasil, esse instituto vem sendo cada vez mais criticado no sentido de que não desempenha suas funções clássicas (organização, produção, e proteção de credores) de maneira efetiva nos dias atuais. Nesse contexto, direito societário moderno vem passando por uma evolução no sentido de questionar a efetividade de seus institutos. A análise aqui proposta do capital social segue esse raciocínio. Para auxiliar na interpretação do instituto no Brasil, serão utilizadas serão estudadas as lições e legislações dos ordenamentos europeu e norte-americano, onde o tema já foi amplamente debatido. O tratamento dado pelo Revised Model Business Corporation Act, legislação modelo norte americana, e da Segunda Diretiva do Capital da União Europeia aos instituto serão comparados com o tratamento da Lei das S.A. para o capital social. Por fim, são identificadas algumas particularidades do instituto do capital social em relação aos ordenamentos estrangeiros, que demonstram que uma eventual supressão do conceito de capital social no Brasil possuiria características próprias que não estão presentes na Europa e nos Estados Unidos. Nesse contexto, serão identificados os custos legislativos que uma eventual mudança do regime de capital social teria no sistema legislativo brasileiro.

Estudo da segurança de cosméticos: Presente e futuro

Cosmetics have been used since ancient times and, recently, their consumption has increased greatly in many countries, including brazil, which is the third largest consumer market in the world. Thus, concern for the safety and efficacy of these products should be heightened, even though these products are rarely related to adverse reactions that damage the health. Brazilian law requires manufacturers to subject their products to safety testing, to assess the possible reactions that could be caused by them (irritation, sensitization, systemic effects). To this end, in general, animals have been used as the experimental model, but this practice is being increasingly controlled, so that the scientific community is looking for alternative tests that do not require experimental in vivo models. Thus, this review aims to describe the main biological assays used to assess the safety of cosmetics, as well as in vitro assays that can replace them.

Weber's law in decision making: integrating behavioral data in humans with a neurophysiological model

Recent single-cell studies in monkeys (Romo et al., 2004) show that the activity of neurons in the ventral premotor cortex covaries with the animal's decisions in a perceptual comparison task regarding the frequency of vibrotactile events. The firing rate response of these neurons was dependent only on the frequency differences between the two applied vibrations, the sign of that difference being the determining factor for correct task performance. We present a biophysically realistic neurodynamical model that can account for the most relevant characteristics of this decision-making-related neural activity. One of the nontrivial predictions of this model is that Weber's law will underlie the perceptual discrimination behavior. We confirmed this prediction in behavioral tests of vibrotactile discrimination in humans and propose a computational explanation of perceptual discrimination that accounts naturally for the emergence of Weber's law. We conclude that the neurodynamical mechanisms and computational principles underlying the decision-making processes in this perceptual discrimination task are consistent with a fluctuation-driven scenario in a multistable regime.