The Supreme Court Confirmation Process and Its Implications

In recent history, there has been a trend of increasing partisan polarization throughout most of the American political system. Some of the impacts of this polarization are obvious; however, there is reason to believe that we miss some of the indirect effects of polarization. Accompanying the trend of increased polarization has been an increase in the contentiousness of the Supreme Court confirmation process. I believe that these two trends are related. Furthermore, I argue that these trends have an impact on judicial behavior. This is an issue worth exploring, since the Supreme Court is the most isolated branch of the federal government. The Constitution structured the Supreme Court to ensure that it was as isolated as possible from short-term political pressures and interests. This study attempts to show how it may be possible that those goals are no longer being fully achieved. My first hypothesis in this study is that increases in partisan polarization are a direct cause of the increase in the level of contention during the confirmation process. I then hypothesize that the more contention a justice faces during his or her confirmation process, the more ideologically extreme that justice will then vote on the bench. This means that a nominee appointed by a Republican president will tend to vote even more conservatively than was anticipated following a contentious confirmation process, and vice versa for Democratic appointees. In order to test these hypotheses, I developed a data set for every Supreme Court nominee dating back to President Franklin D. Roosevelt¿s appointments (1937). With this data set, I ran a series of regression models to analyze these relationships. Statistically speaking, the results support my first hypothesis in a fairly robust manner. My regression results for my second hypothesis indicate that the trend I am looking for is present for Republican nominees. For Democratic nominees, the impacts are less robust. Nonetheless, as the results will show, contention during the confirmation process does seem to have some impact on judicial behavior. Following my quantitative analysis, I analyze a series of case studies. These case studies serve to provide tangible examples of these statistical trends as well as to explore what else may be going on during the confirmation process and subsequent judicial decision-making. I use Justices Stevens, Rehnquist, and Alito as the subjects for these case studies. These cases will show that the trends described above do seem to be identifiable at the level of an individual case. These studies further help to indicate other potential impacts on judicial behavior. For example, following Justice Rehnquist¿s move from Associate to Chief Justice, we see a marked change in his behavior. Overall, this study serves as a means of analyzing some of the more indirect impacts of partisan polarization in modern politics. Further, the study offers a means of exploring some of the possible constraints (both conscious and subconscious) that Supreme Court justices may feel while they decide how to cast a vote in a particular case. Given the wide-reaching implications of Supreme Court decisions, it is important to try to grasp a full view of how these decisions are made.

Bringing the state to England: Andrew Tooke's translation of Samuel Pufendorf's 'De officio hominis et civis'

Andrew Tooke's 1691 English translation of Samuel Pufendorf's De officio hominis et civis, published as The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature, brought Pufendorf's manual fo statist natural law into English politics at a moment of temporary equilibrium in the unfinished contest between Crown and Parliament for the rights and powers of sovereignty. Drawing on the authors' re-edition of The Whole Duty of Man, this article describes and analyses a telling instance of how--by translation--the core political terms and concepts of the German natural jurist's 'absolutist' formulary were reshaped for reception in the different political culture of late seventeenth-century England.

Um longo fôlego: notas sobre a presença de Samuel Beckett em Portugal

A presença do teatro de Samuel Beckett no teatro em Portugal.

Samuel Beckett em Portugal: imagens roubadas ao tempo: 1959-2006

Este artigo analisa a presença da dramaturgia de Samuel Beckett no teatro em Portugal (de 1959 a 2006).

Consulaçam às tribulagens de Israel. A reflexão de Samuel Usque em torno de uma interpretação da história

pp. 177-185

IMPACTOS DA HIDRELÉTRICA SAMUEL SOBRE AS COMUNIDADES DE PEIXES DO RIO JAMARI (RONDÔNIA, BRASIL)

A Usina Hidrelétrica de Samuel está localizada no rio Jamari, primeiro afluente da margem direita do rio Madeira, cerca de 56 km abaixo de Porto Velho-RO. A hidrelétrica teve sua construção iniciada em abril/1982 e entrou em operação a partir de abril/89. O estudo comparativo da ictiofauna, na área de influência daquela hidrelétrica, nas fases de pré e pós-enchimento do reservatório, mostra que as comunidades de peixes sofreram profundas alterações pelo represamento: houve redução da diversidade no reservatório, bem como o aumento de pira-nha-preta (Serrasalmuts rhombeus),tucunaré (Cichla monoculus),aracu-comum (Schizodon fasciatus)e mapará (Hypophthalmus edentatus);imediatamente à jusante da represa houve um aumento de mandi (Pimelodus blochii)\além disso, houve redução dos peixes detritívoros e frugívoros e aumento dos piscivoros.As comunidades de peixes do canal principal do Jamari parecem ter sido mais influenciadas pelo represamento do rio do que aquelas dos lagos marginais. A atividade pesqueira, antes restrita à foz do Jamari, foi intensificada na área do reservatório e isso vem constituindo-se num sério obstáculo para o manejo da pesca. Estes aspectos são comentados e algumas ações são propostas para melhor gerenciamento da pesca c sustentabilidade dos recursos pesqueiros.