Reauthorization of the Price-Anderson Act : hearings before the Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, first session, on S. 445, S. 1225, and S. 1761 ....

"October 22, and 23, 1985"--Pt. 1. -- May 13, 1986--pt. 2.

Litigation relating to atomic testing : hearings before the Subcommittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-ninth Congress, first session, on H.R. 1338 ... October 2 and 3, 1985.

Mode of access: Internet.

O contrato de transporte aéreo

The international conventions and agreements on civil liability emerged with the purpose of regulating the liability of the air carrier, bearing in mind two essential factors: i) the need to protect passengers interests, and ii) to ensure the continuous development of an incipient activity by limiting the compensation amounts. This research will focus on the analysis of the nature of the contract of air carriage, as well as the air carrier's liability regime regarding damages endured by passengers that may result from the non-performance of the contract.

Jurisprudencia ambiental de la Unión Europea = Jurisprudència ambiental de la Unió Europea

[spa] 1. Introducción. 2. Interpretación jurisprudencial del alcance del principio de quien contamina paga en materia de responsabilidad medioambiental. 2.1. Hechos. 2.2. Cuestiones prejudiciales. 2.3. El alcance del principio de quien contamina paga en relación con la responsabilidad medioambiental. A. La aplicación de la Directiva 2004/35/CE en el tiempo. B. El alcance del principio de quien contamina paga en el artículo 174 TCE. C. El alcance del principio de quien contamina paga de conformidad con la Directiva 2004/35/CE: su ámbito de aplicación material. D. Las modalidades de adopción de medidas reparadoras de conformidad con la Directiva 2004/35/CE. D.1. Sobre la modificación sustancial de medidas reparadoras previamente adoptadas cuya ejecución ha sido comenzada o acabada. D.2. Sobre la evaluación de los costes y beneficios de la modificación sustantiva de las medidas de reparación. E. Condiciones para la supeditación del ejercicio del derecho de los operadores a los que se dirigen las medidas reparadoras a utilizar sus tierras a condición de que ejecuten los trabajos que se les exigen.

Kiinteistönvälittäjän vastuu vanhan asunnon kaupassa

Tutkielman tarkoituksena oli selvittää kiinteistönvälittäjän vastuuta vanhan asunnon kaupassa, kun toisena osapuolena on kuluttajan asemassa oleva yksityishenkilö. Työn perustana on kiinteistönvälittäjän toimintaa ohjaava voimassa oleva lainsäädäntö. Tutkimusaineistona käytettiin lisäksi kirjallisuutta ja viime vuosien oikeuskäytäntöä. Kiinteistönvälittäjän vastuu kaupan osapuolille perustuu joko sopimus- tai vahingonkorvausvastuuseen riippuen siitä, onko vahinkoa kärsinyt toimeksiantaja vai tämän vastapuoli. Vastuu edellyttää virhettä välittäjän toiminnassa, joka on tuottamuksen lisäksi syy-yhteydessä aiheutuneeseen vahinkoon. Välittäjän toimissa on virhe, jos se ei vastaa sovittua tai laissa säädettyä.

Pankin notariaattipalvelut – asiantuntijan vastuu sivullista kohtaan

Pro gradu -tutkimuksen keskeisin tavoite on selvittää perusteita pankin notariaattipalveluiden tarjoajan vastuun laajenemiselle yli välittömän toimeksiantosopimussuhteen. Tutkimus on rajattu vain Suomen oikeuteen ja tutkimusasetelmasta seuraa, että vastuun henkilöllisen ulottuvuuden laajentumisen tilanteista tutkimuksessa perehdytään nimenomaisesti sivullisintressitilanteisiin. Tutkimus on toteutettu lainopillisesti. Suomen laissa ei säädetä suoraan välittömän sopimussuhteen ylittävästä vastuusta, joten lainsäädännön jäädessä vähemmälle korostuvat tutkimuksessa sopimusoikeuden yleiset periaatteet sekä korkeimman oikeuden tulkintakäytäntö ja oikeustieteellinen tutkimus. Tämä johtaa etsimään ja jäsentämään tutkimusongelman kannalta merkityksellisiä oikeusperiaatteita ja reaalisia argumentteja tarkkojen tulkintasuositusten tarjoamisen sijaan. Tutkimus osoittaa, että välittömän sopimussuhteen ylittävää vastuuta tulee arvioida sopimusvastuun normien mukaisesti deliktivastuun sijaan, ja sitä voidaan pitää eräänä sopimusvastuun erityistapauksena. Tutkimuksen pohjalta voidaan todeta, että pankin notariaattipalveluiden tarjoajan vastuu voi ulottua yli toimeksiantosopimussuhteen, jos vastuun syntymistä voidaan puoltaa riittävillä reaalisilla argumenteilla. Tällaisia perusteita ovat muun muassa pankin notariaattipalvelun tarjoajan ja sivullisen välinen erityissuhde ja pankin notariaattipalvelun tarjoajan mahdollisuus ennakoida vahinkoriski. Lisäksi kaksiasianosaissuhteen rajoituksesta poikkeamista voidaan perustella vaihdannan reaalisen rakenteen huomioonottamisella sekä sivulliselle syntyneellä perustellun luottamuksen suojaamisella.

Environmental Risks : Should Banks Be Liable?

This paper studies the impact of banks' liability for environmental damages caused by their borrowers. Laws or court decisions that declare banks liable for environmental damages have two objectives : (1) finding someone to pay for the damages and (2) exerting a pressure on a firm's stakeholders to incite them to invest in environmental risk prevention. We study the effect that such legal decisions can have on financing relationships and especially on the incentives to reduce environmental risk in an environment where banks cannot commit to refinance the firm in all circumstances. Following an environmental accident, liable banks more readily agree to refinance the firm. We then show that bank liability effectively makes refinancing more attractive to banks, therefore improving the firm's risk-sharing possibilities. Consequently, the firm's incentives to invest in environmental risk reduction are weakened compared to the (bank) no-liability case. We also show that, when banks are liable, the firm invests at the full-commitment optimal level of risk reduction investment. If there are some externalities such that some damages cannot be accounted for, the socially efficient level of investment is greater than the privately optimal one. in that case, making banks non-liable can be socially desirable.

Environmental Risk: Should Banks Be Liable?

This paper studies the impact of banks' liability for environmental damages caused by their borrowers. Laws or court decisions that declare banks liable for environmental damages have two objectives : (1) finding someone to pay for the damages and (2) exerting a pressure on a firm's stakeholders to incite them to invest in environmental risk prevention. We study the effect that such legal decisions can have on financing relationships and especially on the incentives to reduce environmental risk in an environment where banks cannot commit to refinance the firm in all circumstances. Following an environmental accident, liable banks more readily agree to refinance the firm. We then show that bank liability effectively makes refinancing more attractive to banks, therefore improving the firm's risk-sharing possibilities. Consequently, the firm's incentives to invest in environmental risk reduction are weakened compared to the (bank) no-liability case. We also show that, when banks are liable, the firm invests at the full-commitment optimal level of risk reduction investment. If there are some externalities such that some damages cannot be accounted for, the socially efficient level of investment is greater than the privately optimal one. in that case, making banks non-liable can be socially desirable.

Responsabilidade do estado brasileiro pela concretização da Razoável duração do processo civil

O presente trabalho possui como objetivo analisar do ponto de vista estritamente acadêmico e doutrinário a responsabilidade do Estado brasileiro na concretização da razoável duração do processo civil, postulado processual tipificado na constituição federal através da emenda nº 45, criando um novo inciso em seu art. 5º que dispõe sobre os direitos e garantias fundamentais do homem. O embasamento teórico deste trabalho se manifesta através de consiste pesquisa doutrinária, em livros e periódicos da área jurídica, realizando um cotejo das opiniões de estudiosos nacionais e estrangeiros, da área do direito público. Desenvolve-se, por fim, a noção de dupla responsabilidade do Estado, sendo a primeira, a responsabilidade do Estado como norma definidora de tarefas a serem perseguidas, e a segunda a responsabilidade civil, devida por possíveis danos gerados em processos excessivamente lentos que violam o postulado da razoável duração do processo.

A Primer on ACTA What Europeans Should Fear about the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement

The European Commission recently published the first official draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). The article describes the institutional background of the negotiations on ACTA and its relationship to the existing legal framework. The civil enforcement provisions and the Internet chapter are compared with the international and European instruments in the field. For the most part, ACTA will not oblige EU member states to enact rules that go beyond the already established European standards. But stricter rules could be implemented regarding injunctions against non-infringing intermediaries, strict liability rules for damages, and ex parte measures in preliminary proceedings. According to the published draft, the termination of user accounts in the case of repeated intellectual property infringement will not be mandatory for member ACTA states.

Superfund oversight : hearing before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, first session.

"February 23, 1983"--Pt. 1.

Superfund oversight : hearings before the Subcommittee on Superfund, Ocean, and Water Protection of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, second session.

"November 17, 1992-Bennington, VT"--Pt. 2.

Superfund reassessment and reauthorization : hearings before the Subcommittee on Superfund, Waste Control, and Risk Assessment of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session.

"April 27, and May 4, 9, and 11, 1995"--Pt. 2.

Improving civil jury decision-making: Evidentiary and procedural issues

The civil jury has been under attack in recent years for being unreliable and incompetent. Considering the myriad causes for poor civil juror decision-making, the current investigation explores both procedural and evidentiary issues that impact juror's decisions. Specifically, the first phase of this dissertation examines how jurors (mis)use evidence pertaining to the litigants when determining liability and awarding damages. After investigating how jurors utilize evidence, the focus shifts to exploring the utility of procedural reforms designed to improve decision-making (specifically revising the instructions on the laws in the case and bifurcating the damage phases of the trial). Using the results from the first two phases of the research, the final study involves manipulating pieces of evidence related to the litigants while exploring the effects that revising the judicial instructions have on the utilization of evidence in particular and on decision-making in general. ^ This dissertation was run on-line, allowing participants to access the study materials at their convenience. After giving consent, participants read the scenario of a fictitious product liability case with the litigant manipulations incorporated into the summary. Participants answered several attitudinal, case-specific, and comprehension questions, and were instructed to find in favor of one side and award any damages they felt warranted. Exploratory factor analyses, Probit and linear regressions, and path analyses were used to analyze the data (M-plus and SPSS were the software packages used to conduct the analyses). Results indicated that misuse of evidence was fairly frequent, though the mock jurors also utilized evidence appropriately. Although the results did not support bifurcation as a viable procedural reform, revising the judicial instructions did significantly increase comprehension rates. Trends in the data suggested that better decision-making occurred when the revised instructions were used, thus providing empirical support for this procedural reform as a means of improving civil jury decision-making. Implications for actual trials and attorneys are discussed. ^