Report on Knowledge Exchange workshop Price of keeping knowledge: financial streams for digital preservation

In contrast to cost modeling activities, the pricing of services must be simple and transparent. Calculating and thus knowing price structures, would not only help identify the level of detail required for cost modeling of individual instititutions, but also help develop a ”public” market for services as well as clarify the division of task and the modeling of funding and revenue streams for data preservation of public institutions. This workshop has built on the results from the workshop ”The Costs and Benefits of Keeping Knowledge” which took place 11 June 2012 in Copenhagen. This expert workshop aimed at: •Identifying ways for data repositories to abstract from their complicated cost structures and arrive at one transparent pricing structure which can be aligned with available and plausible funding schemes. Those repositories will probably need a stable institutional funding stream for data management and preservation. Are there any estimates for this, absolute or as percentage of overall cost? Part of the revenue will probably have to come through data management fees upon ingest. How could that be priced? Per dataset, per GB or as a percentage of research cost? Will it be necessary to charge access prices, as they contradict the open science paradigm? •What are the price components for pricing individual services, which prices are currently being paid e.g. to commercial providers? What are the description and conditions of the service(s) delivered and guaranteed? •What types of risks are inherent in these pricing schemes? •How can services and prices be defined in an all-inclusive and simple manner, so as to enable researchers to apply for specific amount when asking for funding of data-intensive projects?Please

Report on Knowledge Exchange workshop Cost models for keeping knowledge: economic models for digital preservation

Organised by Knowledge Exchange & the Nordbib programme 11 June 2012, 8:30-12:30, Copenhagen Adjacent to the Nordbib conference 'Structural frameworks for open, digital research' Participants in break out discussion during the workshop on cost modelsThe Knowledge Exchange and the Nordbib programme organised a workshop on cost models for the preservation and management of digital collections. The rapid growth of the digital information which a wide range of institutions must preserve emphasizes the need for robust cost modelling. Such models should enable these institutions to assess both what resources are needed to sustain their digital preservation activities and allow comparisons of different preservation solutions in order to select the most cost-efficient alternative. In order to justify the costs institutions also need to describe the expected benefits of preserving digital information. This workshop provided an overview of existing models and demonstrated the functionality of some of the current cost tools. It considered the specific economic challenges with regard to the preservation of research data and addressed the benefits of investing in the preservation of digital information. Finally, the workshop discussed international collaboration on cost models. The aim of the workshop was to facilitate understanding of the economies of data preservation and to discuss the value of developing an international benchmarking model for the costs and benefits of digital preservation. The workshop took place in the Danish Agency for Culture and was planned directly prior to the Nordbib conference 'Structural frameworks for open, digital research'

A Guide to Distributed Digital Preservation

This volume is devoted to the broad topic of distributed digital preservation, a still-emerging field of practice for the cultural memory arena. Replication and distribution hold out the promise of indefinite preservation of materials without degradation, but establishing effective organizational and technical processes to enable this form of digital preservation is daunting. Institutions need practical examples of how this task can be accomplished in manageable, low-cost ways."--P. [4] of cover

Digital Preservation - Challenges

Long Term Digital Preservation (LTDP) is a secure and trustworthy mechanism to ingest, process, store, manage, protect, find, access, and interpret digital information such that the same information can be used at some arbitrary point in the future in spite of obsolescence of everything: hardware, software, processes, format, people, etc

New laws for author's rights: adequate for digital preservation?

Introduction. Besides technical and economic-organisational problems, digital preservation also faces legal issues, especially regarding copyright legislation, since all digital preservation strategies involve copying materials and/or using software which is typically copyrighted. The purpose of this paper is to ascertain the extent to which current copyright laws meet the preservation requirements of library materials..Methodology. A cross-sectional analysis of recently updated national copyright laws as well as the impact of the other two protection methods: contractual and technological.Results. Even after the latest updates current copyright legislation is almost useless for digital preservation activities since the opportunities provided by WIPO Copyright Treaty to adapt and extend copyright exceptions and limitations have been used to the full.Conclusion. We need a legislation reform that will make it possible to carry out all required copying and communication activities and software use, even if circumventing technological protection is needed. But that is not enough for licensed works. The best solution for this kind of work is to include specific clauses in the licences that facilitate preservation activities. Thus, cooperation between both parties, libraries and rights' holders, is essential.

Historic preservation plan for the central area general neighborhood renewal area, Savannah, Georgia.

Mode of access: Internet.

Wisconsin's historic preservation plan, 1971-1981 /

Submitted in compliance with requirements of the National Historic Preservation Art of 1966 (PL 89-665).

Preservation plan /

Item 1089.

Digital Preservation and Access to Cultural and Scientific Heritage: Presentation of the KT-DigiCult-BG Project

The fast development and wide application of digital methods, combined with broadened access to the Internet and falling computing costs, have created intense interest in electronic presentation and access to cultural and scientific heritage resources. Information technologies have offered cultural institutions new opportunities for the presentation of their holdings, which are now made accessible not only to the specialists, but also to the citizens and interested parties worldwide. The paper presents an overview of the Bulgarian experience in the field of digital preservation and access and on-going work on the project “Knowledge Transfer for the Digitisation of Scientific and Cultural Heritage to Bulgaria” (MTKD-CT-2004-509754) supported by the Marie Curie programme of the FP6 of the EC.

Digital Preservation and Web Access to the Konkoly Observatory Schmidt Telescope Plate Archive

ACM Computing Classification System (1998): J.2.

3D Laser Scanning for Digital Preservation and Dissemination of Cultural Heritage Main scanned objects - Four Temples of Different Religions in Sofia

The project demonstrates the use of modern technologies for preservation and presentation of the cultural and historical heritage. The idea is a database of cultural and historical heritage sites to be created applying three dimensional laser scanning technology and a combination of geodetic and photogrammetric methods and shooting techniques. For the purposes of carrying out this project, we have focused on some heritage sites in the central part of Sofia. We decided to include these particular buildings because of the fact that there is hardly another city in the world where within a radius of 400 m are located four temples of different religions - Jewish, Muslim, Orthodox and Catholic. In the recent years, preservation of cultural heritage has been increasingly linked to objectives of sustainable development. Today, it has become clear that cultural heritage is also an economic resource that should be used for further economic development (through compulsory preservation of its authentic cultural values). There has been a more active public debate on the role of cultural heritage, regarding the following topics: improving the quality of life through development of cultural tourism, leading to an increase of the employment rate, constantly improving the business climate, etc. Cultural heritage preservation is becoming one of the priority objectives of the urban development policy. The focus has been shifted to new ways of preservation, mainly combinations of sophisticated technological solutions and their application for the purposes of preservation and dissemination of the cultural heritage.

Digital presentation plan: still the foundation of landscape design representation?

The parameters of the orthographic plan drawing largely compel the observer to view the plan image from a single vantage point and in a single instant. the plan drawing places the viewer at a fixed distance—looking from above—at an abstract flattening of a curved surface area of the earth. Landscape architects, who often deal with expansive scales, appreciate how the view from above enables survey and understanding of space of large (or small) tracts of the landscape. The view enabled by the plan, in this case, of a landscape design, allows inscribing and printing on to 2D flat surfaces (computer screens and paper). This process facilitates the sizing and scaling of elements. Plans allow for measurement without distortion of scale afforded by cartographic and drawing techniques that skew space and perspective. Thus the strength of the plan drawing is enabling construction. Its merit as an imaginative, exploratory medium, however, is less convincing.

Instrumentos para a Gestão Documental

Este trabalho de investigação partiu de uma necessidade pessoal em responder a algumas questões sentidas diariamente na execução das minhas tarefas de consultora na área das Ciências Documentais, nomeadamente no recurso aos instrumentos de gestão documental. Tendo já criado alguns instrumentos de gestão documental durante a execução das minhas tarefas, pretendo elaborar um ―manual‖ com propostas de modelos de todos os instrumentos de gestão documental existentes e necessários à execução de tarefas arquivísticas. Iniciamos o trabalho consultando a bibliografia existente e as recomendações emanadas da entidade nacional responsável pelo estabelecimento de políticas arquivísticas, a DGLAB. Este trabalho está estruturado em quatro capítulos. O primeiro apresenta a definição e os objetivos da gestão documental passando por uma breve exposição das questões atuais no âmbito da gestão documental, em Portugal, e ainda uma resumida cronologia da instituição dos Arquivos Nacionais, atual DGLAB. Seguindo-se o segundo capítulo, onde se definem os instrumentos de gestão documental e se faz uma caraterização de cada um, assim como uma análise de cada instrumento de gestão documental aconselhado pela DGLAB, sintetizando com um quadro os objetivos de cada um dos instrumentos documentais. No terceiro capítulo apresentamos a estrutura adotada para a elaboração do questionário que foi usado para recolher os dados relativos à utilização ou não dos instrumentos de gestão documental, nos arquivos dos organismos públicos e os respetivos dados obtidos. No último capítulo enumeram-se os instrumentos de gestão documental apresentando o conteúdo considerado importante na elaboração de cada um, os quais são dados a conhecer nos apêndices, um a um, dos quais salientamos o auto de eliminação, a guia de remessa, o manual de gestão documental, o relatório de avaliação de massas documentais acumuladas, o plano de preservação digital, entre outros. Concluímos que a Administração Pública conhece e sabe da existência da maioria dos instrumentos de gestão documental, nomeadamente os que consideram mais importantes à gestão do seu arquivo - guias de remessa, autos de eliminação e autos de entrega, os quais são também os aconselhados pela DGLAB. Realçamos também o facto de apenas uma diminuta quantidade de organismos possuírem uma portaria de gestão de documentos e o manual de gestão documental.

Os repositórios das instituições de ensino superior portuguesas : estudo comparativo

Artigo relativo a comunicação oral apresentada na 7.ª Conferência Luso-Brasileira de Acesso Aberto que decorreu de 2 a 4 de novembro em Viseu.