Um modelo de implementação do capability maturity model integration nível 2

Apesar de o CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration) prover uma cobertura mais detalhada do ciclo de vida dos produtos que o uso isolado de outros processos de melhoria, ainda assim não pode ser visto como uma metodologia pronta para ser utilizada pelas organizações. Cada organização deve mapear as áreas de processo do nível CMMI desejado (caso a opção seja a representação por estágios, como veremos adiante) à sua metodologia, aos seus métodos e técnicas de desenvolvimento de produtos e sistemas, levando também em consideração os objetivos de negócio da organização. Tanto o CMMI como as demais normas e modelos de qualidade, dizem “o que” e não “como” fazer. Determinar este “como” é um trabalho adicional bastante grande que as organizações devem realizar quando da adoção destas normas. Para isto, normalmente as organizações buscam no mercado empresas de consultoria que possuem experiência na área. Essas consultorias são bastante indicadas porque aumentam significativamente a qualidade e a velocidade dos resultados. Este trabalho pretende facilitar as organizações interessadas na implementação de um modelo de qualidade, fornecendo descrições sobre alguns dos modelos de qualidade mais utilizados atualmente, bem como modelos de processos, guias e formulários que podem ser utilizados diretamente ou como uma base para a implementação do modelo desejado. Embora se aplique à implementação de qualquer modelo de qualidade, mais especificamente, este trabalho destina-se a auxiliar organizações que visem implementar o modelo CMMI nível 2 (doravante usaremos também a abreviação CMMI-N2). Para tanto, descreve de forma mais detalhada este modelo e fornece um caminho para a implementação do mesmo, incluindo a descrição de um processo mínimo de desenvolvimento de software, com base no RUP (Rational Unified Process) e o uso de um modelo de ciclo de vida de melhoria de processos, o IDEAL. Neste trabalho, propõe-se que seja utilizado o modelo IDEAL para a implementação do modelo de qualidade devido ao fato de este modelo ter sido concebido originalmente como um modelo de ciclo de vida para melhoria de processos de software com base no SW-CMM (Capability Maturity Model for Software). Associado a esse modelo, é sugerido que se utilize algumas técnicas e processos de gerência de projetos para cada área de processo do CMMI-N2, visando implantar cada área de processo através de um projeto. Para a implementação são propostos guias, modelos (formulários) de implementação e uma tabela que mapeia todas as áreas de processo do CMMI-N2, seus objetivos, práticas, produtos de trabalho e as ferramentas associadas.

A capability maturity model to assess supply chain performance

In an overcapacity world, where the customers can choose from many similar products to satisfy their needs, enterprises are looking for new approaches and tools that can help them not only to maintain, but also to increase their competitive edge. Innovation, flexibility, quality, and service excellence are required to, at the very least, survive the on-going transition that industry is experiencing from mass production to mass customization. In order to help these enterprises, this research develops a Supply Chain Capability Maturity Model named S(CM)2. The Supply Chain Capability Maturity Model is intended to model, analyze, and improve the supply chain management operations of an enterprise. The Supply Chain Capability Maturity Model provides a clear roadmap for enterprise improvement, covering multiple views and abstraction levels of the supply chain, and provides tools to aid the firm in making improvements. The principal research tool applied is the Delphi method, which systematically gathered the knowledge and experience of eighty eight experts in Mexico. The model is validated using a case study and interviews with experts in supply chain management. The resulting contribution is a holistic model of the supply chain integrating multiple perspectives, and providing a systematic procedure for the improvement of a company’s supply chain operations.

A Capability Maturity Model to Assess Supply Chain Performance

In an overcapacity world, where the customers can choose from many similar products to satisfy their needs, enterprises are looking for new approaches and tools that can help them not only to maintain, but also to increase their competitive edge. Innovation, flexibility, quality, and service excellence are required to, at the very least, survive the on-going transition that industry is experiencing from mass production to mass customization. In order to help these enterprises, this research develops a Supply Chain Capability Maturity Model named S(CM)2. The Supply Chain Capability Maturity Model is intended to model, analyze, and improve the supply chain management operations of an enterprise. The Supply Chain Capability Maturity Model provides a clear roadmap for enterprise improvement, covering multiple views and abstraction levels of the supply chain, and provides tools to aid the firm in making improvements. The principal research tool applied is the Delphi method, which systematically gathered the knowledge and experience of eighty eight experts in Mexico. The model is validated using a case study and interviews with experts in supply chain management. The resulting contribution is a holistic model of the supply chain integrating multiple perspectives, and providing a systematic procedure for the improvement of a company’s supply chain operations.

c2m2 cybersecurity capability maturity model

Questa tesi, dal titolo “Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model (C2M2 v 2.0)” si pone l’obbiettivo di studiare, analizzare, applicare e mostrare punti di forza e criticità di un modello atto a valutare la propria postura di cybersicurezza, al fine di migliorarne i punti critici, trovarne le priorità in cui investire e strutturare un security program integrato in tutti i processi aziendali.

Quality Assurance in Extreme Programming

Our previous research about possible quality improvements in Extreme Programming (XP) led us to a conclusion that XP supports many good engineering practices but there is still place for refinements. Our proposal was to add dedicated Quality Assurance (QA) measures, which should be sufficiently effective and at the same time simpler enough in the context of XP. This paper intends to analyze the possibilities for an effective way for applying approved quality assurance practices to XP. The last should not affect negatively to the process and in the meantime must lead to better quality assurance. We aim to make changes to XP that even if would slow down a bit the development process, will make it more suitable for widest range of projects including large and very large projects as well as life critical and highly reliable systems.

Avaliação dos Processos de Software utilizando CMMI

Atualmente, as empresas distinguem-se das demais pelos produtos e serviços fornecidos com qualidade e dentro dos prazos estabelecidos. Uma empresa de desenvolvimento de software não foge a essa regra e para isso os processos envolvidos nas diversas fases de levantamento, desenvolvimento, implementação e suporte devem estar documentados, ser do conhecimento geral da Organização e colocados em prática diariamente nas diversas atividades dos colaboradores. Para isso deve contribuir uma melhoria contínua desses mesmos processos. O CMMI-DEV, Capability Maturity Model Integration for Development, possibilita a introdução de boas práticas nas diversas áreas do processo de desenvolvimento de software, mas também a avaliação dessas áreas e respetiva identificação de aspetos a necessitarem de ser melhorados ou até disseminados por toda a organização. Este trabalho envolveu efetuar uma análise teórica do CMMI-DEV e sua posterior utilização prática num ambiente de trabalho empresarial para avaliação dos processos dessa empresa. Para a concretização deste segundo aspeto, foi elaborado um questionário para avaliar os processos de uma organização, segundo o modelo CMMI-DEV 1.3, avaliada a facilidade de utilização do questionário de avaliação dos processos por parte dos inquiridos. Foi realizada ainda uma análise aos resultados obtidos nos referidos questionários.

The capability-affordance model: a method for analysis and modelling of capabilities and affordances

Existing capability models lack qualitative and quantitative means to compare business capabilities. This paper extends previous work and uses affordance theories to consistently model and analyse capabilities. We use the concept of objective and subjective affordances to model capability as a tuple of a set of resource affordance system mechanisms and action paths, dependent on one or more critical affordance factors. We identify an affordance chain of subjective affordances by which affordances work together to enable an action and an affordance path that links action affordances to create a capability system. We define the mechanism and path underlying capability. We show how affordance modelling notation, AMN, can represent affordances comprising a capability. We propose a method to quantitatively and qualitatively compare capabilities using efficiency, effectiveness and quality metrics. The method is demonstrated by a medical example comparing the capability of syringe and needless anaesthetic systems.

Método para avaliação de ambientes de desenvolvimento de software combinando CMM e GQM

Este trabalho de conclusão apresenta um método e uma ferramenta para avaliação da maturidade e da capacitação de ambientes de desenvolvimento de software baseado no uso da abordagem Goal/Question/Metric-GQM combinada aos métodos tradicionais de avaliação já existentes para o modelo Capability Maturity Model-CMM. A aplicação deste método através da ferramenta proposta permitirá a organização avaliada estabelecer o grau de conformidade preliminar dos seus processos em relação às exigências do modelo CMM. Esta avaliação poderá ser utilizada como ponto de partida para o estabelecimento de um processo de melhoria. O modelo CMM descreve uma série de estágios de maturidade que são atingidos através da satisfação de metas estabelecidas para áreas-chave do processo de desenvolvimento de software da organização. A evolução deste modelo, chamada de CMMI, Capability Maturity Model Integrated, possibilita que as organizações optem pela forma de implementação do modelo. Esta opção pode se dar através do uso do CMMI em estágios, vertical utilizando os níveis tradicionais do modelo, ou contínua; horizontal baseada nas áreas-chave de processo. Da mesma forma, a avaliação pode ser realizada sobre qualquer modelo escolhido. O modelo GQM descreve uma estrutura hierárquica baseada na existência de metas de melhoria preestabelecidas das quais são extraídas métricas e questões que as satisfazem. O nível de satisfação dessas metas é obtido através da análise das métricas relativas às questões aplicadas ao foco da avaliação Algumas ferramentas para avaliação dos processos relativos ao modelo CMM são apresentadas, tais como o questionário da maturidade e os modelos existentes para a criação de métodos de avaliação, CMM Apraisal Framework-CAF e Apraisal Requirements for CMMI-ARC. O diferencial apresentado é o estabelecimento de métricas objetivas e regras de interpretação dessas para a definição da satisfação de uma determinada área-chave de processo, ACP, do nível 2 do modelo CMMI. Além dessas contribuições vale destacar o estabelecimento de questões adicionais ao questionário da maturidade com o objetivo de capturar essas métricas e a criação de grafos GQM para cada ACP do nível 2 do CMMI. Esses grafos permitem a visualização do relacionamento existente entre cada ACP do nível 2 do CMMI com suas metas, questões e métricas. A aplicação do método e da ferramenta será demonstrada através da utilização de um estudo de caso aplicado na empresa DWA Informática Ltda.

A CMMI-compliant requirements management and development process

Requirements Engineering has been acknowledged an essential discipline for Software Quality. Poorly-defined processes for eliciting, analyzing, specifying and validating requirements can lead to unclear issues or misunderstandings on business needs and project’s scope. These typically result in customers’ non-satisfaction with either the products’ quality or the increase of the project’s budget and duration. Maturity models allow an organization to measure the quality of its processes and improve them according to an evolutionary path based on levels. The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) addresses the aforementioned Requirements Engineering issues. CMMI defines a set of best practices for process improvement that are divided into several process areas. Requirements Management and Requirements Development are the process areas concerned with Requirements Engineering maturity. Altran Portugal is a consulting company concerned with the quality of its software. In 2012, the Solution Center department has developed and applied successfully a set of processes aligned with CMMI-DEV v1.3, what granted them a Level 2 maturity certification. For 2015, they defined an organizational goal of addressing CMMI-DEV maturity level 3. This MSc dissertation is part of this organization effort. In particular, it is concerned with the required process areas that address the activities of Requirements Engineering. Our main goal is to contribute for the development of Altran’s internal engineering processes to conform to the guidelines of the Requirements Development process area. Throughout this dissertation, we started with an evaluation method based on CMMI and conducted a compliance assessment of Altran’s current processes. This allowed demonstrating their alignment with the CMMI Requirements Management process area and to highlight the improvements needed to conform to the Requirements Development process area. Based on the study of alternative solutions for the gaps found, we proposed a new Requirements Management and Development process that was later validated using three different approaches. The main contribution of this dissertation is the new process developed for Altran Portugal. However, given that studies on these topics are not abundant in the literature, we also expect to contribute with useful evidences to the existing body of knowledge with a survey on CMMI and requirements engineering trends. Most importantly, we hope that the implementation of the proposed processes’ improvements will minimize the risks of mishandled requirements, increasing Altran’s performance and taking them one step further to the desired maturity level.

Integration of existing military capability models into the Comprehensive Capability Meta-model

Abstract—This paper discusses existing military capability models and proposes a comprehensive capability meta-model (CCMM) which unites the existing capability models into an integrated and hierarchical whole. The Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture is used as a structure for the CCMM. The CCMM takes into account the abstraction level, the primary area of application, stakeholders, intrinsic process, and life cycle considerations of each existing capability model, and shows how the models relate to each other. The validity of the CCMM was verified through a survey of subject matter experts. The results suggest that the CCMM is of practical value to various capability stakeholders in many ways, such as helping to improve communication between the different capability communities.

A Business continuity management maturity model : the search for an ISO 22301 Compliant BCM Maturity model

BCM (business continuity Management) is a holistic management process aiming at ensuring business continuity and building organizational resilience. Maturity models offer organizations a tool for evaluating their current maturity in a certain process. In the recent years BCM has been subject to international ISO standardization, while the interest of organizations to bechmark their state of BCM agains standards and the use of maturity models for these asessments has increased. However, although new standards have been introduced, very little attention has been paid to reviewing the existing BCM maturity models in research - especially in the light of the new ISO 22301 standard for BCM. In this thesis the existing BCM maturily models are carefully evaluated to determine whetherthey could be improved. In order to accomplish this, the compliance of the existing models to the ISO 22301 standard is measured and a framework for assessing a maturitymodel´s quality is defined. After carefully evaluating the existing frameworks for maturity model development and evaluation, an approach suggested by Becker et al. (2009) was chosen as the basis for the research. An additionto the procedural model a set of seven research guidelines proposed by the same authors was applied, drawing on the design-science research guidelines as suggested by Hevner et al. (2004). Furthermore, the existing models´ form and function was evaluated to address their usability. Based on the evaluation of the existing BCM maturity models, the existing models were found to have shortcomings in each dimension of the evaluation. Utilizing the best of the existing models, a draft version for an enhanced model was developed. This draft model was then iteratively developed by conducting six semi-structured interviews with BCM professionals in finland with the aim of validating and improving it. As a Result, a final version of the enhanced BCM maturity model was developed, conforming to the seven key clauses in the ISO 22301 standard and the maturity model development guidelines suggested by Becker et al. (2009).

SPICE: a business process diagnostic tool for construction projects

The construction sector is under growing pressure to increase productivity and improve quality, most notably in reports by Latham (1994, Constructing the Team, HMSO, London) and Egan (1998, Rethinking Construction, HMSO, London). A major problem for construction companies is the lack of project predictability. One method of increasing predictability and delivering increased customer value is through the systematic management of construction processes. However, the industry has no methodological mechanism to assess process capability and prioritise process improvements. Standardized Process Improvement for Construction Enterprises (SPICE) is a research project that is attempting to develop a stepwise process improvement framework for the construction industry, utilizing experience from the software industry, and in particular the Capability Maturity Model (CMM), which has resulted in significant productivity improvements in the software industry. This paper introduces SPICE concepts and presents the results from two case studies conducted on design and build projects. These studies have provided further in-sight into the relevance and accuracy of the framework, as well as its value for the construction sector.