Produção científica em revistas internacionais pelos autores da acta médica portuguesa

As revistas científicas locais e regionais têm sido amplamente criticadas por alguns autores. Além disso, dificilmente são indexadas nas bases de dados internacionais, o que reduz a visibilidade dos seus artigos. Objectivo: Analisar a produção científica internacional dos autores que publicaram na Acta Médica Portuguesa no ano de 2008. Métodos: Construi-se uma base de dados com todos os autores que publicaram durante o ano de 2008 na Acta Médica Portuguesa. Em Julho de 2009 recolheu-se do Science Citation Index a produção de todos estes autores publicada nos cinco anos anteriores (2003-2007). Analisaram-se as revistas em que publicaram, o Factor de Impacto destas revistas, as referencias destes artigos, e as citações recebidas. Resultados: Os 78 artigos publicados pela Acta Médica Portuguesa em 2008 foram escritos por 259 autores diferentes. Destes autores, 94 (36,3%) escreveram 420 artigos entre 2003-2007, indexados no Science Citation Index. Estes artigos apareceram em 249 revistas diferentes, com um Factor de Impacto médio de 2,973 (DP = 2,92). A revista com maior Factor de Impacto foi The Lancet (FI2008 = 28,409) com dois artigos publicados. Destes autores, 87 tinham recebido alguma citação aos seus artigos, com um total de 5001 citações. Das 14035 referências destes 420 artigos, apenas 10 eram a algum trabalho publicado na Acta Médica Portuguesa. Conclusão: Os autores que publicam na Acta Médica Portuguesa têm uma boa quantidade de publicações internacionais, em revistas com um considerável Factor de Impacto e recebem um razoável número de citações. Pelo contrário, estes autores quando publicam em revistas internacionais citam extremamente pouco os artigos da Acta Médica Portuguesa.

A luz na pintura de representação : mito, representação e luz na prática pictórica : (1550-1650)

Tese de doutoramento, Belas-Artes (Pintura), Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Belas-Artes, 2014

Reducing task’s redundancy – the strategy of Faculty of Pharmacy Library to centralize all scientific research

Introduction – Based on a previous project of University of Lisbon (UL) – a Bibliometric Benchmarking Analysis of University of Lisbon, for the period of 2000-2009 – a database was created to support research information (ULSR). However this system was not integrated with other existing systems at University, as the UL Libraries Integrated System (SIBUL) and the Repository of University of Lisbon (Repositório.UL). Since libraries were called to be part of the process, the Faculty of Pharmacy Library’ team felt that it was very important to get all systems connected or, at least, to use that data in the library systems. Objectives – The main goals were to centralize all the scientific research produced at Faculty of Pharmacy, made it available to the entire Faculty, involve researchers and library team, capitalize and reinforce team work with the integration of several distinct projects and reducing tasks’ redundancy. Methods – Our basis was the imported data collection from the ISI Web of Science (WoS), for the period of 2000-2009, into ULSR. All the researchers and indexed publications at WoS, were identified. A first validation to identify all the researchers and their affiliation (university, faculty, department and unit) was done. The final validation was done by each researcher. In a second round, concerning the same period, all Pharmacy Faculty researchers identified their published scientific work in other databases/resources (NOT WoS). To our strategy, it was important to get all the references and essential/critical to relate them with the correspondent digital objects. To each researcher previously identified, was requested to register all their references of the ‘NOT WoS’ published works, at ULSR. At the same time, they should submit all PDF files (for both WoS and NOT WoS works) in a personal area of the Web server. This effort enabled us to do a more reliable validation and prepare the data and metadata to be imported to Repository and to Library Catalogue. Results – 558 documents related with 122 researchers, were added into ULSR. 1378 bibliographic records (WoS + NOT WoS) were converted into UNIMARC and Dublin Core formats. All records were integrated in the catalogue and repository. Conclusions – Although different strategies could be adopted, according to each library team, we intend to share this experience and give some tips of what could be done and how Faculty of Pharmacy created and implemented her strategy.

Stirner – on the brink of scientific thought

Stirner and Feyerabend, despite being historically a hundred and fifty years apart, seem to have been of the same mind in revolting against the methodological explaining of what cannot methodologically be explained. Stirner attempted an explanation in a more intuitive version, Feyerabend in a more sophisticated one. For both thinkers it is obviously important to sustain dissent with the assumption that method is the one and only vital promoter of scientific progress. They equally voice the opinion that, despite science itself producing inconsistencies as well as results, its proceedings nonetheless follow a certain rationale. But to codify a definite approach to phenomena or matter i.e. to establish a definite method for taking a look into things turns science into religion and scientists into believers. As a result no new insights are to be gained.