1 resultado para Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
em Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (16)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (10)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (48)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (43)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (48)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (16)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (69)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (3)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (25)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (56)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (13)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (27)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (3)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (11)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (9)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (10)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (15)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (12)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (17)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (71)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (10)
- Scielo Uruguai (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (15)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (26)
- Universidade do Minho (10)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (39)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (62)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Michigan (20)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (40)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
To evaluate the use of optical and nonoptical aids during reading and writing activities in individuals with acquired low vision. This study was performed using descriptive and cross-sectional surveys. The data collection instrument was created with structured questions that were developed from an exploratory study and a previous test based on interviews, and it evaluated the following variables: personal characteristics, use of optical and nonoptical aids, and activities that required the use of optical and nonoptical aids. The study population included 30 subjects with acquired low vision and visual acuities of 20/200-20/400. Most subjects reported the use of some optical aids (60.0%). Of these 60.0%, the majority (83.3%) cited spectacles as the most widely used optical aid. The majority (63.3%) of subjects also reported the use of nonoptical aids, the most frequent ones being letter magnification (68.4%), followed by bringing the objects closer to the eyes (57.8%). Subjects often used more than one nonoptical aid. The majority of participants reported the use of optical and nonoptical aids during reading activities, highlighting the use of spectacles, magnifying glasses, and letter magnification; however, even after the use of these aids, we found that the subjects often needed to read the text more than once to understand it. During writing activities, all subjects reported the use of optical aids, while most stated that they did not use nonoptical aids for such activities.