Biblioteca Digital

3 resultados para SO(2)

em Archive of European Integration

Oral Question 0-0060/94 pursuant to Rule 40 of the Rules of Procedure. Subject: Future EU Mediterranean policy activities and their funding: The conclusions of every European Council since Lisbon 1992 stress the need for permanent, coherent EU collaboration with the States of the Mediterranean basin. The European Parliament has also repeatedly called for such collaboration, most recently in a resolution of 4 May 1994 on the European Council held in Corfu, expressing its hope 'for a more ambitious form of EU action, the creation of a stability pact and the setting up of agreements with the countries of the Mediterranean basin, .... 1. Is the Commission preparing proposals on a Mediterranean policy for submission to the Council? If so, when are they to be submitted?; 2. What kind of action does the Commission envisage for the Mediterranean basin and what monies are to be used to finance these activities? Session Documents 1994, Document B4-0121/94, 26 September 1994

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Oral Question (0-93/83) with debate pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure by Mr Fanti and Mr Piquet on behalf of the Communist and Allies Group to the Commission of the European Communities. Subject: Decisions to be taken on four subjects of the negotiations taken as a whole whereas the Stuttgart European Council has declared itself in favour of a genuine overall compromise with regard to the decisions to be taken on four subjects of negotiation taken as a whole (CAP, structural funds, financing of the Community and correction of imbalances, EMS and new policies), whereas the European Parliament has stated clearly that any proposal for the correction of financial imbalances in isolation from the other aspects is unacceptable, having regard to the undertakings repeatedly made by the Council that it will take into account the opinions expressed by the European Parliament on the above-mentioned topics and that it will involve Parliament itself; 1. What stage has the negotiation reached? 2. Have the above-mentioned criteria and undertakings been observed? 3. What Guarantee can the Commission give so as to avoid biased or unsatisfactory results, as occurred in the case of the mandate of 30 May 1980. Working Documents 1983-1984. Document 1-960/83. 26 October 1983

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Oral Question (0-94/83) with debate pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure by Mr Fanti and Mr Piquet on behalf of the Communist and Allies Group to the Council of the European Communities. Subject: Decisions to be taken on four subjects of the negotiation taken as a whole whereas the Stuttgart European Council has declared itself in favor of a genuine overall compromise with regard to the decisions to be taken on four subjects of negotiation taken as a whole (CAP, structural funds, financing of the Community and correction of imbalances, EMS and new policies), whereas the European Parliament has stated clearly that any proposal for the correction of financial imbalances in isolation from the other aspects is unacceptable, having regard to the undertakings repeatedly made by the Council that it will take into account the opinions expressed by the European Parliament on the above-mentioned topics and that it will involve Parliament itself; 1. What stage has the negotiation reached? 2. Have the above-mentioned criteria and undertakings been observed? 3. What guarantee can the Council give so as to avoid biased or unsatisfactory results, as occured in the case of the mandate of 30 May 1980?. Working Documents 1983-1984. Document 1-961/83. 26 October 1983.

Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador: