Estrutura do cerradão e da transição entre cerradão e floresta paludícola num fragmento da International Paper do Brasil Ltda., em Brotas, SP

A biodiversidade existente no cerrado está seriamente ameaçada pela devastação, pois muitas das espécies que aí ocorrem possuem distribuição geográfica restrita. Pela posição central do cerrado no continente sul-americano, ocorrem associações entre a vegetação do cerrado e outras formações, dentre estas a floresta paludícola. Os objetivos deste trabalho foram conhecer a flora e descrever a comunidade arbustivo-arbórea de um cerradão e da transição entre esse cerradão e uma floresta paludícola em Brotas, e investigar as similaridades e diferenças florísticas entre levantamentos realizados em fisionomias similares no estado de São Paulo. No fragmento ocorreram 125 espécies de 91 gêneros e 49 famílias. Myrtaceae e Leguminosae foram as famílias mais ricas em espécies, um padrão consistente com o encontrado em outros levantamentos nos cerrados paulistas. Somente em Brotas, Lauraceae e Euphorbiaceae apresentaram alta riqueza específica. No levantamento fitossociológico, em 1,0 ha, foram amostrados 3.787 indivíduos com DAS > 3 cm (H' = 3,378 nats.indivíduo-1). As espécies de maior importância sociológica foram Xylopia aromatica, Vochysia tucanorum, Ocotea pulchella, Gochnatia polymorpha e Myrcia albo-tomentosa. Não foi encontrada correlação significativa entre a similaridade florística e a distância geográfica entre as 10 áreas de cerrado analisadas, devido à grande proporção de espécies comuns. Essa grande proporção de espécies comuns corrobora resultados de outros autores, de que o estado de São Paulo se localiza num centro de diversidade do cerrado, cuja composição florística é diferente de outros centros de diversidade no Brasil.

The use of filter paper plasticized with polyvinyl alcohol-glutaraldehyde in ELISA

F1-antigen purified from Yersinia pestis was covalently linked to 5-mm diameter filter paper discs plasticized with polyvinyl alcohol-glutaraldehyde. These discs were used both for ELISA and dot-ELISA for the detection of anti-F1 IgG in rabbits. The best conditions were achieved using 1.25 µg of F1 antigen/disc, 3% w/v skim milk in PBS as blocking agent, anti-IgG peroxidase conjugate diluted 12,000 times, and serum from rabbits immunized or not against Y. pestis, diluted 6,400 times. The absorbance values obtained from the comparative study between this procedure and conventional ELISA were not significantly different but the low cost of the reagents employed in ELISA using the filter paper discs plasticized with polyvinyl alcohol-glutaraldehyde makes this method economically attractive.

Assessing negative priming by attended distractors in a paper-and-pencil task

The paper-and-pencil digit-comparison task for assessing negative priming (NP) was introduced, using a referent-size-selection procedure that was demonstrated to enhance the effect. NP is indicated by slower responses to recently ignored items, and proposed within the clinical-experimental framework as a major cognitive index of active suppression of distracting information, critical to executive functioning. The digit-comparison task requires circling digits of a list with digit-asterisk pairs (a baseline measure for digit-selection), and the larger of two digits in each pair of the unrelated (with different digits in successive digit-pairs) and related lists (in which the smaller digit subsequently became a target). A total of 56 students (18-38 years) participated in two experiments that explored practice effects across lists and demonstrated reliable NP, i.e., slowing to complete the related list relative to the unrelated list, (F(2, 44) = 52.42, P < 0.0001). A 3rd experiment examined age-related effects. In the paper-and-pencil digit-comparison task, NP was reliable for the younger (N = 8, 18-24 years) and middle-aged adults (N = 8, 31-54 years), but absent for the older group (N = 8, 68-77 years). NP was also reduced with aging in a computer-implemented digit-comparison task, and preserved in a task typically used to test location-specific NP, accounting for the dissociation between identity- and spatial-based suppression of distractors (Rao R(3, 12) = 16.02, P < 0.0002). Since the paper-and-pencil digit-comparison task can be administered easily, it can be useful for neuropsychologists seeking practical measures of NP that do not require cumbersome technical equipment.

Addressing conflicts of interest in the research paper: a societal demand in contemporary science?

In the last decade, dialogue between science and society has found a forum in an increasing number of publications on topics such as public engagement with science and public trust in science. Concerning the latter, issues that include cases of research misconduct, accountability in research, and conflicts of interest (COIs) have shaped global discussions on the communication of science. In the publication setting, the perception that hiding COIs and/or not managing them well may affect public trust in the research record has grown among editors. We conducted a search for editorials addressing COIs between 1989 and 2011, using four major databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge. We explored the content of these editorials and the relationship they established between COIs and the public trust in science. Our results demonstrate that the relationship between disclosure of COIs and public trust in science has become a major concern among editors. We, thus, argue that COIs should be discussed more openly and frequently in graduate courses in the sciences, around the globe, not only in biomedical but also in non-biomedical areas. This is a critical issue in contemporary science, as graduate students are the future voices and decision-makers of the research community. Therefore, COIs, especially in the broader context of science and society, merit closer attention from policymakers, researchers, and educators. At times of great expectations for public engagement with science, mishandling of COIs may have undesirable consequences for public engagement with science and confidence in the scientific endeavor.