11 resultados para TIMSS mathematics test

em Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS


Relevância:

40.00% 40.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2015

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

We present a test for identifying clusters in high dimensional data based on the k-means algorithm when the null hypothesis is spherical normal. We show that projection techniques used for evaluating validity of clusters may be misleading for such data. In particular, we demonstrate that increasingly well-separated clusters are identified as the dimensionality increases, when no such clusters exist. Furthermore, in a case of true bimodality, increasing the dimensionality makes identifying the correct clusters more difficult. In addition to the original conservative test, we propose a practical test with the same asymptotic behavior that performs well for a moderate number of points and moderate dimensionality. ACM Computing Classification System (1998): I.5.3.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2013

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 62L10, 62L15.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 62P10, 92D10, 92D30, 62F03

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 62H12, 62P99

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The “trial and error” method is fundamental for Master Minddecision algorithms. On the basis of Master Mind games and strategies weconsider some data mining methods for tests using students as teachers.Voting, twins, opposite, simulate and observer methods are investigated.For a pure data base these combinatorial algorithms are faster then manyAI and Master Mind methods. The complexities of these algorithms arecompared with basic combinatorial methods in AI. ACM Computing Classification System (1998): F.3.2, G.2.1, H.2.1, H.2.8, I.2.6.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2014

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 62H15, 62H12.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2016

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education and Research in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2016