39 resultados para Integrals, Hyperelliptic.

em Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The aim of this paper is to study a generalized form of elliptic-type integrals which unify and extend various families of elliptic-type integrals studied recently by several authors. In a recent communication [1] we have obtained recurrence relations and asymptotic formula for this generalized elliptic-type integral. Here we shall obtain some more results which are single and multiple integral formulae, differentiation formula, fractional integral and approximations for this class of generalized elliptic-type integrals.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mathematics Subject Classification: 26A16, 26A33, 46E15.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 44A15, 44A35, 46E30

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Math. Subject Classification: Primary 42B20, 42B25, 42B35

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

MSC 2010: 03E72, 26E50, 28E10

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 34C07, secondary 34C08.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14H40, 20M14.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 41A25, 41A36.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 14Q05, 14Q15, 14R20, 14D22.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1) where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14J26.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

* Partially supported by Grant MM523/95 with Ministry of Science and Technologies.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

We prove that in quadratic perturbations of generic Hamiltonian vector fields with two saddle points and one center there can appear at most two limit cycles. This bound is exact.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The present paper deals with the KAM-theory conditions for systems describing the motion of a particle in central field.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26A33 (main), 44A40, 44A35, 33E30, 45J05, 45D05