1 resultado para Mechanics (Persons)
em Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (11)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Archive of European Integration (82)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (16)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (99)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (24)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (14)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (136)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (33)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (39)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (35)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (5)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (9)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (5)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (13)
- Harvard University (12)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (7)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (54)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (7)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (49)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (79)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (50)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (12)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (72)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
Most theodicy responses to the problem of evil have in common the claim that God legitimately allows some evil such that greater good may come. This response is puzzling because the seemingly overwhelming consensus (at least amongst Christian apologists) is that 1) morality is deontological in nature (e.g. our duty of obedience to God’s commands, or acting in accordance with God’s purpose), and 2) relatedly, that humans are made in God’s image (i. e. are rational beings) and thus are worthy of respect. I shall argue that theodicy defenses that claim that God allows some evil such that greater good may come are untenable because they either unnecessarily bifurcate Christian morality in an ad hoc manner, or entail that God cannot have respect for persons.