Theodicies, Utilitarianism, and Respect for Persons


Autoria(s): Freelin, Jeffrey
Data(s)

03/10/2008

Resumo

Most theodicy responses to the problem of evil have in common the claim that God legitimately allows some evil such that greater good may come. This response is puzzling because the seemingly overwhelming consensus (at least amongst Christian apologists) is that 1) morality is deontological in nature (e.g. our duty of obedience to God’s commands, or acting in accordance with God’s purpose), and 2) relatedly, that humans are made in God’s image (i. e. are rational beings) and thus are worthy of respect. I shall argue that theodicy defenses that claim that God allows some evil such that greater good may come are untenable because they either unnecessarily bifurcate Christian morality in an ad hoc manner, or entail that God cannot have respect for persons.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

https://bluetigercommons.lincolnu.edu/philosophy_and_theology/2008/sessions/4

https://bluetigercommons.lincolnu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=philosophy_and_theology

Publicador

Blue Tiger Commons@LincolnU

Fonte

Conference on Philosophy and Theology

Palavras-Chave #Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion
Tipo

text