3 resultados para Chromosome 22
em DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center
Resumo:
The BCR gene is involved in the pathogenesis of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph$\sp1$) leukemias. Typically, the 5$\sp\prime$ portion of BCR on chromosome 22 becomes fused to a 5$\sp\prime$ truncated ABL gene from chromosome 9 resulting in a chimeric BCR-ABL gene. To investigate the role of the BCR gene product, a number of BCR peptide sequences were used to generate anti-BCR antibodies for detection of BCR and BCR-ABL proteins. Since both BCR and ABL proteins have kinase activity, the anti-BCR antibodies were tested for their ability to immunoprecipitate BCR and BCR-ABL proteins from cellular lysates by use of an immunokinase assay. Antisera directed towards the C-terminal portions of P160 BCR, sequences not present in BCR-ABL proteins, were capable of co-immunoprecipitating P210 BCR-ABL from the Ph$\sp1$- positive cell line K562. Re-immunoprecipitation studies following complete denaturation showed that C-terminal BCR antisera specifically recognized P160 BCR but not P210 BCR-ABL. These and other results indicated the presence of a P160 BCR/P210 BCR-ABL protein complex in K562 cells. Experiments performed with Ph$\sp1$-positive ALL cells and uncultured Ph$\sp1$-positive patient white blood cells established the general presence of BCR/BCR-ABL protein complexes in BCR-ABL expressing cells. However, two cell lines derived from Ph$\sp1$-positive patients lacked P160 BCR/P210 BCR-ABL complexes. Lysates from one of these cell lines mixed with lysates from a cell line that expresses only P160 BCR failed to generate BCR/BCR-ABL protein complexes in vitro indicating that P160 BCR and P210 BCR-ABL do not simply oligomerize.^ Two-dimensional tryptic maps were performed on both BCR and BCR-ABL proteins labeled in vitro with $\sp{32}$P. These maps indicate that the autophosphorylation sites in BCR-ABL proteins are primarily located within BCR exon 1 sequences in both P210 and P185 BCR-ABL, and that P160 BCR is phosphorylated in trans in similar sites by the activated ABL kinase of both BCR-ABL proteins. These results provide strong evidence that P160 BCR serves as a target for the BCR-ABL oncoprotein.^ K562 cells, induced to terminally differentiate with the tumor promoter TPA, show a loss of P210 BCR-ABL kinase activity 12-18 hours after addition of TPA. This loss coincides with the loss of activity in P160 BCR/P210 BCR-ABL complexes but not with the loss of the P210 BCR-ABL, suggesting the existence of an inactive form of P210 BCR-ABL. However, a degraded BCR-ABL protein served as the kinase active form preferentially sequestered within the remaining BCR/BCR-ABL protein complex.^ The results described in this thesis form the basis for a model for BCR-ABL induced leukemias which is presented and discussed. ^
Resumo:
It is well established that the chimeric Bcr-Abl oncoprotein resulting from fusing 3$\sp\prime$ ABL sequences on chromosome 9 to 5$\sp\prime$ BCR sequences on chromosome 22 is the primary cause of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph$\sp1$) leukemias. Although it is clear that the cis-Bcr sequence present within Bcr-Abl is able to activate the tyrosine kinase activity and F-actin binding capacity of Bcr-Abl which is critical for the transforming ability of BCR-ABL, the biological role of normal BCR gene product (P160 BCR) remains largely unknown. The previous finding by our lab that P160 BCR forms stable complexes with Bcr-Abl oncoprotein in Ph$\sp1$-positive leukemic cells implicated P160 BCR in the pathogenesis of Ph$\sp1$-positive leukemias. Here, we demonstrated that P160 BCR physically interacts with P210 BCR-ABL and become tyrosine phosphorylated when co-expressed with P210 BCR-ABL in COS1 cells while no tyrosine phosphorylation of P160 BCR can be detected when it is expressed alone. The results suggest that P160 BCR is a target for the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase. Although we were unable to detect stable physical interaction between P160 BCR and P145 c-ABL (Ib) in COS1 cells overexpressing both proteins, P160 BCR was phosphorylated on tyrosine residues when co-expressed with activated tyrosine kinase of P145 c-ABL (Ib). In addition, studies of tyrosine phosphorylation of BCR deletion mutants and 2-dimensional tryptic mapping of in vitro phosphorylated wild type and mutant (tyrosine to phenylalanine) Bcr-Abl indicated that tyrosine 177, 283 and 360 of Bcr represent some of the phosphorylation sites. Even though the significance of tyrosine phosphorylation of residues 283 and 360 of Bcr has not been determined, tyrosine phosphorylation of residue 177 within Bcr-Abl has been reported to be critical for its interaction with Grb2 molecule and subsequent activation of Ras signaling pathway. Here, we further demonstrated that tyrosine 177 phosphorylated P160 BCR is also able to bind to Grb2 molecule suggesting the role of P160 BCR in the Ras signaling pathway.^ Surprisingly, using 3$\sp\prime$ BCR antisense oligonucleotide to reduce the expression of P160 BCR without interfering with the expression of BCR-ABL resulted in increased growth or survival of B15 cells and M3.16 cells expressing either P185 BCR-ABL or P210 BCR-ABL respectively. The results provided strong arguments that P160 BCR may function as a negative regulator for cell growth.^ Considering all these results, we hypothesize that P160 BCR negatively regulate cell growth and tyrosine phosphorylation of P160 BCR turns off its growth suppressor function and turns on its growth stimulatory function. We further speculate that Bcr-Abl oncoprotein in leukemia cells stably interacts with and constitutively phosphorylates portions of P160 BCR converting it into a growth stimulatory state. In normal cells, the growth suppressor effects of P160 BCR could only be transiently and conditionally switched to growth stimulatory action by a strictly regulated cellular tyrosine kinase such as c-ABL. The model will be further discussed in the text. ^
Resumo:
Extensive experience with the analysis of human prophase chromosomes and studies into the complexity of prophase GTG-banding patterns have suggested that at least some prophase chromosomal segments can be accurately identified and characterized independently of the morphology of the chromosome as a whole. In this dissertation the feasibility of identifying and analyzing specified prophase chromosome segments was thus investigated as an alternative approach to prophase chromosome analysis based on whole chromosome recognition. Through the use of prophase idiograms at the 850-band-stage (FRANCKE, 1981) and a comparison system based on the calculation of cross-correlation coefficients between idiogram profiles, we have demonstrated that it is possible to divide the 24 human prophase idiograms into a set of 94 unique band sequences. Each unique band sequence has a banding pattern that is recognizable and distinct from any other non-homologous chromosome portion.^ Using chromosomes 11p and 16 thru 22 to demonstrate unique band sequence integrity at the chromosome level, we found that prophase chromosome banding pattern variation can be compensated for and that a set of unique band sequences very similar to those at the idiogram level can be identified on actual chromosomes.^ The use of a unique band sequence approach in prophase chromosome analysis is expected to increase efficiency and sensitivity through more effective use of available banding information. The use of a unique band sequence approach to prophase chromosome analysis is discussed both at the routine level by cytogeneticists and at an image processing level with a semi-automated approach to prophase chromosome analysis. ^