Gastrointestinal tract mucosal histomorphometry and epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis in neonatal and adult dogs

In this study, the hypothesis was tested that the size of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) mucosal components and rates of epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis change with increasing age. The aims were to quantitatively examine GIT histomorphology and to determine mucosal epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis rates in neonatal (<48 h old) and adult (8 to 11.5 yr old) dogs. Morphometrical analyses were performed by light microscopy with a video-based, computer-linked system. Cell proliferation and apoptosis of the GIT epithelium were evaluated by counting the number of Ki-67 and caspase-3-positive cells, respectively, using immunohistochemical methods. Thickness of mucosal, glandular, subglandular, submucosal and muscular layers, crypt depths, villus heights, and villus widths were consistently greater (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001), whereas villus height/crypt depth ratios were smaller (P < 0.001) in adult than in neonatal dogs. The number of Ki-67-positive cells in stomach, small intestine, and colon crypts, but not in villi, was consistently greater (P < 0.01) in neonatal than in adult dogs. In contrast, the number of caspase-3-positive cells in crypts of the stomach, small intestine, and colon and in villi was not significantly influenced by age. In conclusion, canine GIT mucosal morphology and epithelial cell proliferation rates, but not apoptosis rates, change markedly from birth until adulthood is reached.

STROBE Statement: linee guida per descrivere gli studi osservazionali

Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study’s generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, casecontrol, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed “Explanation and Elaboration” document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.