The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

[The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

[The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a che-cklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) has established a set of items related to study design and administrative information that should build the minimum set of data in a study register. A more comprehensive data set for registration is currently developed by the Ottawa Group. Since nothing is known about the attitudes of academic researchers towards prospective study registration, we surveyed academic researchers about their opinion regarding the registration of study details proposed by the WHO and the Ottawa Group. METHODS: This was a web-based survey of academic researchers currently running an investigator-initiated clinical study which is registered with clinicaltrials.gov. In July 2006 we contacted 1299 principal investigators of clinical studies by e-mail explaining the purpose of the survey and a link to access a 52-item questionnaire based on the proposed minimum data set by the Ottawa Group. Two reminder e-mails were sent each two weeks apart. Association between willingness to disclose study details and study phase was assessed using the chi-squared test for trend. To explore the potential influence of non-response bias we used logistic regression to assess associations between factors associated with non-response and the willingness to register study details. RESULTS: Overall response was low as only 282/1299 (22%) principal investigators participated in the survey. Disclosing study documents, in particular the study protocol and financial agreements, was found to be most problematic with only 31% of respondents willing to disclose these publicly. Consequently, only 34/282 (12%) agreed to disclose all details proposed by the Ottawa Group. Logistic regression indicated no association between characteristics of non-responders and willingness to disclose details. CONCLUSION: Principal investigators of non-industry sponsored studies are reluctant to disclose all data items proposed by the Ottawa Group. Disclosing the study protocol and financial agreements was found to be most problematic. Future discussions on trial registration should not only focus on industry but also on academic researchers.

STROBE Statement: linee guida per descrivere gli studi osservazionali

Much of biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study’s generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, casecontrol, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed “Explanation and Elaboration” document is published separately and is freely available on the web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

Internetbasierte psychologische Behandlung bei Depressionen

Depression ist die häufigste psychische Erkrankung, aber nur ein geringer Anteil der Betroffenen erhält eine angemessene Behandlung. Internetbasierte Interventionen stellen eine vielversprechende Ergänzung zu traditionellen Behandlungsformen dar, denn über das Internet können breite Bevölkerungsschichten mit wenig Aufwand erreicht werden. Die vorliegende Übersicht stellt den aktuellen Forschungsstand zu internetbasierten Interventionen bei Depressionen dar. Mehrere randomisierte kontrollierte Studien, Metaanalysen und Reviews legen nahe, dass mit strukturierten internetbasierten Interventionen, die regelmäßige Kontakte mit Therapeuten beinhalten (z.B. geleitete Selbsthilfeansätze, E-Mail- oder Chat-Therapien), Effekte erzielt werden können, die mit den Effekten von traditionellen Psychotherapien vergleichbar sind. Ungeleitete Selbsthilfeprogramme sind typischerweise mit hohen Abbrecherquoten und geringeren Effekten verbunden. Die zukünftige Forschung sollte sich vermehrt mit der Frage beschäftigen, wie internetbasierte Interventionen bei Depressionen optimal in die psychosoziale Versorgung integriert werden können. Mögliche Einsatzbereiche und die Einbettung internetbasierter Interventionen in das Versorgungssystem werden dargestellt und diskutiert.

Social skills as predictors of communication, performance and quality of collaboration in project-based learning

The assumption that social skills are necessary ingredients of collaborative learning is well established but rarely empirically tested. In addition, most theories on collaborative learning focus on social skills only at the personal level, while the social skill configurations within a learning group might be of equal importance. Using the integrative framework, this study investigates which social skills at the personal level and at the group level are predictive of task-related e-mail communication, satisfaction with performance and perceived quality of collaboration. Data collection took place in a technology-enhanced long-term project-based learning setting for pre-service teachers. For data collection, two questionnaires were used, one at the beginning and one at the end of the learning cycle which lasted 3 months. During the project phase, the e-mail communication between group members was captured as well. The investigation of 60 project groups (N = 155 for the questionnaires; group size: two or three students) and 33 groups for the e-mail communication (N = 83) revealed that personal social skills played only a minor role compared to group level configurations of social skills in predicting satisfaction with performance, perceived quality of collaboration and communication behaviour. Members from groups that showed a high and/or homogeneous configuration of specific social skills (e.g., cooperation/compromising, leadership) usually were more satisfied and saw their group as more efficient than members from groups with a low and/or heterogeneous configuration of skills.

Internetbasierte geleitete Selbsthilfeansätze bei Angststörungen und Depressionen

Das Spektrum internetbasierter psychologischer Behandlungsangebote bei psychischen Problemen und Erkrankungen bewegt sich zwischen webbasierten Selbsthilfeprogrammen, die das Internet als Informationsmedium verwenden, und Email-, Chat- und Video-Therapien, in welchen das Internet zu Kommunikationszwecken zwischen Hilfesuchenden und Professionellen genutzt wird. Dieser Beitrag fokussiert auf eine Beratungs- und Therapieform, die die Möglichkeiten des Internets als Informations- und Kommunikationsmedium in sogenannten geleiteten Selbsthilfeansätzen kombiniert. Internetbasierte geleitete Selbsthilfeansätze, in welchen Klienten während der Bearbeitung eines Selbsthilfeprogramms von Therapeuten via Internet (z.B. Email) unterstützt werden, wurden in den letzten Jahren intensiv erforscht. Im Bereich von Angststörungen und Depressionen liegen besonders viele Studien vor. Verschiedene Forschergruppen haben hier in der Regel große Behandlungseffekte gefunden, die mit der Wirkung von Face-to-Face-Therapien vergleichbar sind. In diesem Beitrag wird der geleitete Selbsthilfeansatz dargestellt und die empirische Evidenz diskutiert.

Internetbasierte Psychotherapie

In den letzten Jahren wurde ein breites Spektrum an internet- bzw. technikbasierten Interventionen bei psychischen Problemen und Erkrankungen entwickelt. Angebote reichen von internetbasierten und DVD-vermittelten Selbsthilfeprogrammen zu E-Mail-Therapien, von Prävention über Beratung und Behandlung zu Nachsorge- und Rückfallpräventionsprogrammen, und von Interventionen, die computervermittelte Teile in hauptsächlich Face-to-Face durchgeführte Interventionen integrieren bis hin zu vollständig via Internet durchgeführte Therapien. In diesem Workshop werden verschiedene Ansätze und empirische Befunde erläutert. Anhand konkreter Beispiele werden Vor- und Nachteile, sowie Qualitätsmerkmale entsprechender Angebote diskutiert.

Internetbasierte Therapien

In den letzten Jahren wurde ein breites Spektrum an internetbasierten Interventionen bei psychischen Problemen und Erkrankungen entwickelt. Angebote reichen von internetbasierten Selbsthilfeprogrammen zu E-Mail-Therapien, von Prävention über Beratung und Behandlung zu Nachsorge- und Rückfallpräventionsprogrammen, und von Interventionen, die internetvermittelte Teile in hauptsächlich Face-to-Face durchgeführte Interventionen integrieren bis hin zu vollständig via Internet durchgeführte Therapien. In diesem Vortrag wird schwerpunktmäßig auf internetbasierte therapeutengeleitete und ungeleitete Selbsthilfeprogramme bei Angststörungen und Depressionen eingegangen. Dabei geht es neben Fragen zur Wirksamkeit um die Rolle des therapeutischen Kontaktes, um Merkmale von Menschen, die internetbasierte Therapieangebote nutzen und um Prädiktoren des Therapieerfolgs und Wirkmechanismen. Im Weiteren werden Vor- und Nachteile, neuere Entwicklungen und Fragen zur Implementierung entsprechender Ansätze in die Regelversorgung diskutiert.

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

Schnideoch, Alpes Bernoises, 2756 m: Découvertes archéologiques dans la glace du Néolithique au Haut Moyen Âge

Depuis que les glaciers fondent, la glace libère des objets hautement intéressants. C’est ainsi qu’en été 2003 une promeneuse a ramassé un objet qui a été remis au Service archéologique du canton de Berne. La datation au C14 révéla qu’il s’agit d’un fragment de carquois en écorce de bouleau datant du Néolithique Final. Depuis l’été 2004, le Service archéologique du canton de Berne étudie le site du Schnidejoch,un col situé à 2756 mètres d’altitude entre l’Oberland bernois et le Valais, et a ainsi pu récolter plus de 300 objets . L’éventail des objets découverts s’étend de bouts de vêtements préhistoriques en cuir et raphia à des épingles en bronze et des clous de souliers romains en passant par un carquois et des flèches. Les découvertes du Schnidejoch sont les plus anciennes du genre jamais faites dans les Alpes.

Internetbasierte Interventionen bei psychischen Störungen

Der Einsatz und die Erforschung internetbasierter Interventionen bei psychischen Störungen haben in den letzten Jahren rapide zugenommen. In einigen Ländern wurde die Behandlung via Internet bereits in die psychosoziale Versorgung integriert. Der Band bietet einen Überblick über verschiedene Ansätze der Online-Therapie und -Beratung und zeigt auf, wie die Interventionen bei der Prävention, Therapie und Nachsorge psychischer Störungen praktisch umgesetzt werden können. Zunächst geht der Band auf die Vor- und Nachteile, Besonderheiten, auf rechtliche und ethische Aspekte sowie auf Qualitätskriterien von Internet-Interventionen ein. In knapper Form werden Theorien und Modelle der computervermittelten Kommunikation vorgestellt und deren Implikationen für die Praxis der Online-Beratung und -Therapie aufgezeigt. Es folgen konkrete Anleitungen zum diagnostischen Vorgehen, wie z.B. zum Einsatz von Online-Fragebogendiagnostik und zur Durchführung diagnostischer Interviews per Telefon. Anhand von Beispielen werden verschiedene internetbasierte Interventionen, wie z.B. webbasierte Selbsthilfeprogramme, E-Mail-, Chat-Therapie oder die Therapie via Videokonferenzsysteme, die entweder vollständig via Internet oder ergänzend zu traditionellen Psychotherapien und Beratungen realisiert werden können, vorgestellt. Abschließend werden Behandlungsempfehlungen gegeben und wichtige Fragen, die sich bei der konkreten Ausgestaltung dieser neuen Behandlungsform stellen, geklärt.

Does the Use of Mobile Devices (Tablets and Smartphones) Affect Stated Choice Behavior in Web Surveys? An Application to Environmental Valuation

Web surveys are becoming increasingly popular in survey research. Compared with face-to-face, telephone and mail surveys, web surveys may contain a different and new source of measurement error and bias: the type of device that respondents use to answer the survey questions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that tests whether the use of mobile devices affects survey characteristics and stated preferences in a web-based choice experiment. The web survey was carried out in Germany with 3,400 respondents, of which 12 per cent used a mobile device (i.e. tablet or smartphone), and comprised a stated choice experiment on externalities of renewable energy production using wind, solar and biomass. Our main finding is that survey characteristics such as interview length and acquiescence tendency are affected by the device used. In contrast to what might be expected, we find that, compared with respondents using desktop computers and laptops, mobile device users spent more time to answer the survey and are less likely to be prone to acquiescence bias. In the choice experiment, mobile device users tended to be more consistent in their stated choices, and there are differences in willingness to pay between both subsamples.

Anreizformen und Ausschöpfungsquoten bei postalischen Befragungen. Eine Prüfung der Reziprozitätshypothese

Mittels eines Methodenexperiments mit zwei randomisierten Versuchsgruppen (N jeweils 200) und einer Kontrollgruppe (N=200) wird untersucht, ob und in welchem Ausmaß Geschenke bei einer postalischen Befragung zur Erhöhung der Ausschöpfungsquote beitragen. Es zeigt sich, dass ein versprochenes Geschenk (Telefonkarte im Wert von 10 Schweizer Franken) die Ausschöpfungsquote nicht erhöht, während ein dem Fragebogen beigelegtes Geschenk zu einem Anstieg der Quote um zirka 10 Prozentpunkte führt. Die Befunde stehen in Einklang mit der Reziprozitätshypothese, derzufolge Vorleistungen von vielen Personen auch dann honoriert werden, wenn die reziproke Handlung nicht dem unmittelbaren Eigeninteresse eines Akteurs entspricht.