4 resultados para Machine-ground interaction

em AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Progetto SHERPA. Installazione e configurazione del Navigaton Stack su Rover terrestre. Utilizzo e configurazione di LMS151 Sick. Utilizzo e configurazione di Asus Xtion Pro. Progettazione di software per la localizzazione e l'inseguimento di persone tramite camera di profondita.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Trying to explain to a robot what to do is a difficult undertaking, and only specific types of people have been able to do so far, such as programmers or operators who have learned how to use controllers to communicate with a robot. My internship's goal was to create and develop a framework that would make that easier. The system uses deep learning techniques to recognize a set of hand gestures, both static and dynamic. Then, based on the gesture, it sends a command to a robot. To be as generic as feasible, the communication is implemented using Robot Operating System (ROS). Furthermore, users can add new recognizable gestures and link them to new robot actions; a finite state automaton enforces the users' input verification and correct action sequence. Finally, the users can create and utilize a macro to describe a sequence of actions performable by a robot.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

As a consequence of the diffusion of next generation sequencing techniques, metagenomics databases have become one of the most promising repositories of information about features and behavior of microorganisms. One of the subjects that can be studied from those data are bacteria populations. Next generation sequencing techniques allow to study the bacteria population within an environment by sampling genetic material directly from it, without the needing of culturing a similar population in vitro and observing its behavior. As a drawback, it is quite complex to extract information from those data and usually there is more than one way to do that; AMR is no exception. In this study we will discuss how the quantified AMR, which regards the genotype of the bacteria, can be related to the bacteria phenotype and its actual level of resistance against the specific substance. In order to have a quantitative information about bacteria genotype, we will evaluate the resistome from the read libraries, aligning them against CARD database. With those data, we will test various machine learning algorithms for predicting the bacteria phenotype. The samples that we exploit should resemble those that could be obtained from a natural context, but are actually produced by a read libraries simulation tool. In this way we are able to design the populations with bacteria of known genotype, so that we can relay on a secure ground truth for training and testing our algorithms.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is gaining ever more ground in every sphere of human life, to the point that it is now even used to pass sentences in courts. The use of AI in the field of Law is however deemed quite controversial, as it could provide more objectivity yet entail an abuse of power as well, given that bias in algorithms behind AI may cause lack of accuracy. As a product of AI, machine translation is being increasingly used in the field of Law too in order to translate laws, judgements, contracts, etc. between different languages and different legal systems. In the legal setting of Company Law, accuracy of the content and suitability of terminology play a crucial role within a translation task, as any addition or omission of content or mistranslation of terms could entail legal consequences for companies. The purpose of the present study is to first assess which neural machine translation system between DeepL and ModernMT produces a more suitable translation from Italian into German of the atto costitutivo of an Italian s.r.l. in terms of accuracy of the content and correctness of terminology, and then to assess which translation proves to be closer to a human reference translation. In order to achieve the above-mentioned aims, two human and automatic evaluations are carried out based on the MQM taxonomy and the BLEU metric. Results of both evaluations show an overall better performance delivered by ModernMT in terms of content accuracy, suitability of terminology, and closeness to a human translation. As emerged from the MQM-based evaluation, its accuracy and terminology errors account for just 8.43% (as opposed to DeepL’s 9.22%), while it obtains an overall BLEU score of 29.14 (against DeepL’s 27.02). The overall performances however show that machines still face barriers in overcoming semantic complexity, tackling polysemy, and choosing domain-specific terminology, which suggests that the discrepancy with human translation may still be remarkable.