Effetti clinici e biologici della terapia epigenetica nelle sindromi mielodisplastiche a basso rischio

Background: Nucleoside 5-Azacitidine (5-Aza) in high risk MDS patients (pts) at a dose of 75mg/mq/day subcutaneously for 7 days, every 28 days, induces high hematologic response rates (hematologic improvement (HI) 50-60%, complete remission (CR) 10-30%) and prolongation of survival (at 2 years 50,8%). Aim: The role of 5-Aza in low-risk MDS patients is not well defined but its use in the earlier phases of disease could be more effective and useful to control the expansion of MDS clone and disease progression. In our phase II, prospective, multicentric trial a low-dose schedule of 5-Aza (75 mg/mq daily for 5 consecutive days every 28 days) was given to low-risk MDS pts in order to evaluate its efficacy and tolerability and to identify biological markers to predict the response. Methods: From September 2008 to February 2010, 34 patients were enrolled into the study. Fifteen patients had refractory anemia (RA), 5 patients refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS), 7 patients refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD) and 7 patients refractory anemia with excess blasts-1 (RAEB-1). All patients failed previously EPO therapy and were in chronic red blood cell (RBC) supportive care with a median transfusions requirement of 4 units/monthly. The response treatment criteria was according to IWG 2006. Results: At present time 31 out of 34 pts are evaluable: 12/31 pts (39%) completed the treatment plan (8 courses), 7/31 pts (22%) performed the first 4 courses, 8/31 (26%) made 1 to 3 courses and 4/31 (13%) died during the treatment period. Out of 12 pts who completed the 8 courses of therapy 10 (83%) obtained an HI, 2/12 (17%) maintained a stable disease. Out of 10 pts who obtained HI, 4 pts (40%) achieved a CR. Generally the drug was very well tolerated. The most commonly reported hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (55%) and thrombocytopenia (19%) but they were transitory and usually no delay of treatment was necessary. 2/4 pts died early after the 1th cycle for septic shock and gastrointestinal hemorrage respectively whereas 2/4 pts died in a condition of stable disease after the 4th cycle for pneumonia and respiratory distress. Samples for biologic studies have been collected from the pts before starting the therapy and at the end of 4th and 8th course. Preliminary data on the lipid signalling pathways suggested a direct correlation between PI-PLC-β1 gene expression and 5-Aza responsiveness. Conclusion: Interim analysis of our study based on the small number of cases who completed the treatment program, shows that 83% of pts obtain an HI and 40% obtain a CR. 4 patients died during the treatment and even if the causes were reported as no related to the therapy it has been considered that caution has to be reserved in given 5-Aza in these pts who are elderly and frail. Preliminary data of PI-PLC-β1 gene expression suggest that this and probably other biological markers could help us to know a priori who are the patients who have more chances to respond.

La terapia demetilante con 5-azacitidina nelle sindromi mielodisplastiche: esperienza clinica del Nostro Istituto e correlazione con i dati biologici

Sulla base delle evidenze della letteratura (Fenaux, 2009; Lyons, JCO 2009), a partire da Settembre 2004 nel Nostro Istituto sono stati trattati 57 pazienti affetti da Sindrome Mielodisplastica (MDS) mediante terapia demetilante con 5-Azacitidina. Sono stati utilizzati differenti regimi terapeutici a seconda della classe di rischio IPSS: i pazienti a rischio basso/intermedio-1 hanno ricevuto Azacitidina 75 mg/mq/die sottocute per 5 giorni/mese (schema 5) per 8 cicli; i pazienti a rischio alto/intermedio-2 hanno ricevuto Azacitidina 50 mg/mq/die sottocute per 10 giorni/mese (schema 5+2+5) o Azacitidina 75 mg/mq/die per 7 giorni/mese (schema 7) fino a perdita della risposta. Su una casistica totale di 57 pazienti (15 a rischio basso/int-1; 41 rischio alto/int-2), l’87.7% (50 pazienti) sono risultati valutabili. Tra questi le risposte osservate sono state del 68% (34 pazienti), di cui il 14% (7 pazienti) ha ottenuto una Remissione Completa (CR) ed il 54% (27 pazienti) ha ottenuto un Hematologic Improvement (HI). La valutazione della risposta è stata eseguita secondo i criteri dell’International Working Group 2006 (IWG, Cheeson 2006). Le principali tossicità osservate sono state rappresentate da reazioni cutanee locali nel sito d’iniezione, tossicità gastrointestinale (stipsi e/o diarrea), mielotossicità, neutropenia febbrile, sepsi (3 pazienti). Tra i pazienti trattati abbiamo osservato la presenza di risposta ematologica prolungata (≥ 20 mesi) in 10 pazienti (20% dei pazienti valutabili). Inoltre, grazie alla collaborazione con il Dipartimento di Anatomia Umana dell’Università di Bologna (Prof. L. Cocco, Dott.ssa M.Y. Follo), tutti i pazienti trattati sono stati valutati per i livelli di espressione genica e metilazione del gene della fosfolipasi PI-PLC-beta1. I dati biologici così ottenuti sono stati correlati con quelli clinici, evidenziando la presenza di una correlazione tra i livelli di espressione genica e mutilazione della PI-PLC-beta1 e la risposta alla terapia demetilante con 5-Azacitidina.

Studio di fase I sulla reinfusione intraepatica di cellule staminali CD 133+ altamente purificate nei pazienti con malattia epatica terminale

Numerose evidenze sperimentali hanno dimostrato il contributo delle cellule staminali di derivazione midollare nei processi di rigenerazione epatica dopo danno tissutale. E’ cresciuto pertanto l’interesse sul loro potenziale impiego in pazienti con cirrosi. Questo studio si propone di valutare la fattibilità e la sicurezza della reinfusione intraepatica di cellule staminali midollari autologhe CD133+ in 12 pazienti con insufficienza epatica terminale definita da un punteggio di Model for End Stage of Liver Disease (MELD) compreso tra 17 e 25. L’efficacia in termini di funzionalità epatica rappresenta un obiettivo secondario. Previa mobilizzazione nel sangue periferico mediante somministrazione di granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alla dose di 7,5 mcg/Kg/b.i.d. e raccolta per leucoaferesi, le cellule CD133+ altamente purificate vengono reinfuse in arteria epatica a partire da 5x104/Kg fino a 1x106/kg. Nei tre giorni successivi si somministra G-CSF per favorire l’espansione e l’attecchimento delle cellule. Durante la mobilizzazione, la reinfusione e nei 12 mesi successivi i pazienti sono sottoposti a periodici controlli clinici, laboratoristici e strumentali e ad attenta valutazione di effetti collaterali. Lo studio è tuttora in corso e ad oggi, 11 pazienti sono stati sottoposti a reinfusione e 4 hanno completato i 12 mesi di follow-up. Il G-CSF è stato ben tollerato e ha consentito di ottenere una buona espansione cellulare. Dopo la reinfusione sono stati documentati un ematoma inguinale e due episodi transitori di encefalopatia portosistemica. Durante il follow-up 4 pazienti sono stati trapiantati e 2 sono morti. Non è stata osservata alcuna modificazione significativa degli indici di funzione epatica. Questi risultati preliminari confermano la possibilità di mobilizzare e reinfondere un numero adeguato di cellule staminali di derivazione midollare in pazienti con malattia epatica in stadio terminale.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors in adult patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma relapsed/refractory: a phase II study with Panobinostat

Backgrounds:Treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not eligible to high dose therapy represents an unmet medical need. Panobinostat showed encouraging therapeutic activity in studies conducted in lymphoma cell lines and in vivo in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies.Purpose:FIL-PanAL10 (NCT01523834) is a phase II, prospective multicenter trial of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) to evaluate safety and efficacy of single agent Panobinostat as salvage therapy for R/R DLBCL patients and to evaluate a possible relationships between response and any biological features. Patients and Methods:Patients with R/R DLBCL were included. The treatment plan included 6 induction courses with Panobinostat monotherapy followed by other 6 courses of consolidation. The primary objective was to evaluate Panobinostat activity in terms of overall response (OR); secondary objectives were: CR rate, time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), safety and feasibility of Panobinostat. We included evaluation of the impact of pharmacogenetics, immunohistochemical patterns and patient’s specific gene expression and mutations as potential predictors of response to Panobinostat as explorative objectives. To this aim a pre-enrollment new tissue biopsy was mandatory. ResultsThirty-five patients, 21 males (60%), were enrolled between June 2011 and March 2014. At the end of induction phase, 7 responses (20%) were observed, including 4 CR (11%), while 28 patients (80%) discontinued treatment due to progressive disease (PD) in 21 (60%) or adverse events in 7 (20%). Median TTR in 9 responders was 2.6 months (range 1.8-12). With a median follow up of 6 months (range 1-34), the estimated 12 months PFS and OS were 27% and 30.5%, respectively. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the most common toxicities (in 29 (83%) and 12 (34%) patients, respectively. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that Panobinostat might be remarkably active in some patients with R/R DLBCL, showing durable CR

Proton radiotherapy: a therapeutic opportunity for pediatric brain tumor patients

Proton radiation therapy is a form of external radiation that uses charged particles which have distinct physical advantages to deliver the majority of its dose in the target while minimizing the dose of radiation to normal tissues. In children who are particularly susceptible even at low and medium doses of radiation, the significant reduction of integral dose can potentially mitigate the incidence of side effects and improve quality of life. The aim of the first part of the thesis is to describe the physical and radiobiological properties of protons, the Proton Therapy Center of Trento (TCPT) active for clinical purpose since 2014, which use the most recent technique called active pencil beam scanning. The second part of the thesis describes the preliminary clinical results of 23 pediatric patients with central nervous system tumors as well as of two aggressive pediatric meningiomas treated with pencil beam scanning. All the patients were particularly well-suited candidates for proton therapy (PT) for possible benefits in terms of survival and incidence of acute and late side effects. We reported also a multicentric experience of 27 medulloblastoma patients (median age 6 years, M/F ratio 13/14) treated between 2015 and 2020 at TPTC coming from three Pediatric oncology centers: Bologna, Florence, and Ljubljana, with a focus on clinical results and toxicities related to radiotherapy (RT). Proton therapy was associated with mostly mild acute and late adverse effects and no cases of CNS necrosis or high grade of neuroradiological abnormailities. Comparable rates of survival and local control were obtained to those achievable with conventional RT. Finally, we performed a systematic review to specifically address the safety of PT for pediatric CNS patients, late side effects and clinical effectiveness after PT in this patient group.

L'immunoterapia in associazione alla terapia standard per i pazienti con Mieloma Multiplo di nuova diagnosi candidabili alla chemioterapia ad alte dosi

Lo scenario terapeutico del Mieloma Multiplo (MM) si è ampiamente evoluto nelle ultime decadi con l’introduzione di un numero sempre maggiore di combinazioni di nuovi farmaci molto efficaci. In tal contesto, spicca Daratumumab (dara), grazie ai suoi dati di efficacia e di sicurezza dimostrati sia nel setting del paziente ricaduto/refrattario che di nuova diagnosi. Lo scopo del presente studio è quello di aggiungere dati circa la combinazione di dara con la terapia standard nel contesto di un programma trapiantologico per pazienti di nuova diagnosi candidabili alla chemioterapia ad alte dosi, con un particolare focus sull’impatto dell’anticorpo monoclonale sulla raccolta delle cellule staminali (PBSC). Sono stati analizzati 41 pazienti trattati presso il nostro centro nell’ambito di due studi clinici (EMN17 e EMN18). Con un follow-up mediano pari a 19 mesi, dara aggiunto alla terapia standard ha dimostrato un’ottima efficacia, in termini di risposte profonde e sopravvivenza libera da malattia, ed un buon profilo di sicurezza, senza tossicità aggiuntive o inaspettate. Inoltre, nello studio registrativo CASSIOPEIA dara non ha avuto un impatto negativo sulla raccolta delle PBSC; infatti, nei pazienti sottoposti a dara il numero il numero mediano di PBSC raccolte è risultato inferiore e questi hanno necessitato più frequentemente di Plerixafor, senza, tuttavia, modifiche nell’iter trapiantologico rispetto al gruppo di controllo. Analogamente, nella nostra analisi i pazienti del gruppo dara hanno utilizzato maggiormente Plerixafor ed è emerso come questi possano beneficiare da un dosaggio maggiore di Ciclofosfamide mobilizzante (3 g/mq rispetto 2 g/mq). Durante lo svolgimento del presente progetto dara è stato approvato in pratica clinica prima in Europa (2020) e poi in Italia (2021). Il presente studio ha confermato come dara aggiunto ad un regime di induzione Bortezomib-based rappresenti un nuovo standard of care per i pazienti con MM di nuova diagnosi eleggibili alla chemioterapia ad alte dosi.

Understanding molecular mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) that target PD-1/PD-L1 have recently emerged as an integral component of front-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC patients. The PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab is approved as monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1% and in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 expression level. However, responses to either regimen occur in only a minority of cases, and PD-L1 TPS is limited as a biomarker in predicting whether a cancer will respond to PD-1 inhibition alone or would be more likely to benefit from PD-1 inhibition plus chemotherapy. Additional biomarkers of immunotherapy efficacy, such as tumor mutational burden (TMB), have not been incorporated into routine clinical practice for treatment selection. The identification of patients who have the greatest likelihood of responding to immunotherapies is critical for guiding treatment decisions. IN addition, early indicators of response could theoretically prevent patients from staying on an ineffective therapy where they might experience complications due to disease progression or develop toxicities from unnecessary exposure to an inactive agent. The aim of this research project is to investigate the clinicopathologic and molecular determinant of response/resistance to the currently available immune checkpoint inhibitors, in order to identify therapeutic vulnerabilities that can be exploited to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC.