Decorso delle coliti severe: un confronto tra colite ulcerosa e di Crohn

Pochi sono i dati disponibili sul decorso clinico della malattia di Crohn del colon severa(CD). L'obiettivo è quello di descrivere il decorso clinico della colite di Crohn severa (CC) in una coorte di pazienti isolata con CD del colon o ileocolica, e di confrontarlo con il decorso clinico di pazienti affetti da colite ulcerosa severa (UC). 34 pazienti con CC severa sono stati identificati retrospettivamente nella nostra coorte di 593 pazienti ricoverati (2003-2012) attraverso la valutazione di CDAI score e HBI. 169 pazienti con UC severa sono stati identificati retrospettivamente in una coorte di 449 pazienti ricoverati (2003-2012) attraverso la valutazione del score di Lichtiger e di Truelove-Witts. Abbiamo valutato questi risultati: risposta agli steroidi, risposta ai farmaci biologici, tasso di colectomia acuta, tasso di colectomia durante il follow-up, megacolon e tasso di infezione da citomegalovirus. Non abbiamo trovato differenze significative nella risposta agli steroidi e biologici, della percentuale di infezione da citomegalovirus e di megacolon, mentre il tasso di colectomia in acuto è risultato essere maggiore nei pazienti con CC rispetto ai pazienti con UC; anche la differenza tra i tassi di colectomia alla fine del follow-up è risultata non significativa. Con l'analisi univariata la giovane età alla diagnosi è associata ad un aumentato rischio di colectomia in assoluto (p = 0,024) e in elezione (p = 0.022), ma non in acuto. Il tasso globale di colectomia nei pazienti con CC severa è superiore a quella dei pazienti con UC severa , ma questo dato non è supportato da una diversa risposta clinica alla terapia steroidea o terapia di salvataggio con biologici. Il vero decorso clinico della colite di Crohn severa necessita di essere chiarito da studi prospettici che includano un numero maggiore di pazienti con questo sottogruppo di malattia.

Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty as Bridge-to-Decision in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Background. A sizable group of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) can undergo neither surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) nor transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) because of clinical contraindications. The aim of this study was to assess the potential role of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as a “bridge-to-decision” in selected patients with severe AS and potentially reversible contraindications to definitive treatment. Methods. We retrospectively enrolled 645 patients who underwent first BAV at our Institution between July 2007 and December 2012. Of these, the 202 patients (31.2%) who underwent BAV as bridge-to-decision (BTD) requiring clinical re-evaluation represented our study population. BTD patients were further subdivided in 5 groups: low left ventricular ejection fraction; mitral regurgitation grade ≥3; frailty; hemodynamic instability; comorbidity. The main objective of the study was to evaluate how BAV influenced the final treatment strategy in the whole BTD group and in its single specific subgroups. Results. Mean logistic EuroSCORE was 23.5±15.3%, mean age was 81±7 years. Mean transaortic gradient decreased from 47±17 mmHg to 33±14 mmHg. Of the 193 patients with BTD-BAV who received a second heart team evaluation, 72.5% were finally deemed eligible for definitive treatment (25.4%for AVR; 47.2% for TAVI): respectively, 96.7% of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction recovery; 70.5% of patients with mitral regurgitation reduction; 75.7% of patients who underwent BAV in clinical hemodynamic instability; 69.2% of frail patients and 68% of patients who presented relevant comorbidities. 27.5% of the study population was deemed ineligible for definitive treatment and treated with standard therapy/repeated BAV. In-hospital mortality was 4.5%, cerebrovascular accident occurred in 1% and overall vascular complications were 4% (0.5% major; 3.5% minor). Conclusions. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty should be considered as bridge-to-decision in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who cannot be immediate candidates for definitive percutaneous or surgical treatment.

Severe Accident Simulation of Small Modular Reactors

Since the Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2), accident in 1979 which led to the meltdown of about one half of the reactor core and to limited releases of radioactive materials to the environment, an important international effort has been made on severe accident research. The present work aims to investigate the behaviour of a Small Modular Reactor during severe accident conditions. In order to perform these analyses, a SMR has been studied for the European reference severe accident analysis code ASTEC, developed by IRSN and GRS. In the thesis will be described in detail the IRIS Small Modular Reactor; the reference reactor chosen to develop the ASTEC input deck. The IRIS model was developed in the framework of a research collaboration with the IRSN development team. In the thesis will be described systematically the creation of the ASTEC IRIS input deck: the nodalization scheme adopted, the solution used to simulate the passive safety systems and the strong interaction between the reactor vessel and the containment. The ASTEC SMR model will be tested against the RELAP-GOTHIC coupled code model, with respect to a Design Basis Accident, to evaluate the capability of the ASTEC code on reproducing correctly the behaviour of the nuclear system. Once the model has been validated, a severe accident scenario will be simulated and the obtained results along with the nuclear system response will be analysed.