Metodi di composizione stragiudiziale delle controversie individuali di lavoro

L’elaborato ha ad oggetto lo studio della conciliazione e dell’arbitrato con riferimento alle controversie individuali di lavoro privato e pubblico. Vengono trattati i diversi profili che caratterizzano gli strumenti di risoluzione delle liti alternativi al processo, al fine di comprenderne la disciplina e l’effettiva portata, e di evidenziarne le criticità. L’elaborato si occupa, in primo luogo, di ricostruire il percorso di sviluppo della disciplina legislativa dei due istituti, partendo dalla configurazione del quadro della sua evoluzione storica e affrontando, poi, approfonditamente le più recenti tappe di tale evoluzione. Nella ricostruzione della disciplina della conciliazione e dell’arbitrato viene dato conto dell’assetto delle fonti, legislativa e contrattuale, definendone i rispettivi ruoli e competenze in materia: la tesi si sofferma quindi sul ruolo che il legislatore attribuisce all’autonomia collettiva e sulle modalità con le quali questo ruolo viene concretamente esercitato in sede di contrattazione. Successivamente, viene compiuta una valutazione delle conciliazioni e dell’arbitrato diretta a comprenderne l’efficacia e l’effettività. L’analisi pone in rilievo taluni elementi che sono ritenuti indispensabili per lo sviluppo delle predette caratteristiche e, quindi, per l’opzione e per la fiducia delle parti verso gli strumenti di composizione stragiudiziale delle liti. L’attenzione viene poi focalizzata sui regimi di impugnazione dei provvedimenti con cui si concludono le procedure stragiudiziali, sulla base della riflessione per la quale la diffusione di uno strumento di composizione delle controversie postula necessariamente un certo grado di stabilità degli atti che esso genera. L’ultima parte dell’elaborato è dedicata alla disamina delle ipotesi applicative di successo nell’esperienza italiana di Alternative Dispute Resolution, ossia il tentativo obbligatorio di conciliazione nei licenziamenti economici introdotto dalla Riforma Fornero, la conciliazione monocratica e l’arbitrato per l’impugnazione delle sanzioni disciplinari, anche con l’intento di comprendere quali caratteristiche ne abbiano favorito la diffusione, in rapporto alle altre tipologie di conciliazione e arbitrato di lavoro.

Insulin and TOR pathways regulate cellular and organismal growth through the myc oncogene in Drosophila

A large body of literature documents in both mice and Drosophila the involvement of Insulin pathway in growth regulation, probably due to its role in glucose and lipid import, nutrient storage, and translation of RNAs implicated in ribosome biogenesis (Vanhaesebroeck et al. 2001). Moreover several lines of evidence implicate this pathway as a causal factor in cancer (Sale, 2008; Zeng and Yee 2007; Hursting et al., 2007; Chan et al., 2008). With regards to Myc, studies in cell culture have implied this family of transcription factors as regulators of the cell cycle that are rapidly induced in response to growth factors. Myc is a potent oncogene, rearranged and overexpressed in a wide range of human tumors and necessary during development. Its conditional knock-out in mice results in reduction of body weight due to defect in cell proliferation (Trumpp et al. 2001). Evidence from in vivo studies in Drosophila and mammals suggests a critical function for myc in cell growth regulation (Iritani and Eisenman 1999; Johnston et al. 1999; Kim et al. 2000; de Alboran et al. 2001; Douglas et al. 2001). This role is supported by our analysis of Myc target genes in Drosophila, which include genes involved in RNA binding, processing, ribosome biogenesis and nucleolar function (Orain et al 2003, Bellosta et al., 2005, Hulf et al, 2005). The fact that Insulin signaling and Myc have both been associated with growth control suggests that they may interact with each other. However, genetic evidence suggesting that Insulin signaling regulates Myc in vivo is lacking. In this work we were able to show, for the first time, a direct modulation of dMyc in response to Insulin stimulation/silencing both in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggest that dMyc up-regulation in response to DILPs signaling occurs both at the mRNA and potein level. We believe dMyc protein accumulation after Insulin signaling activation is conditioned to AKT-dependent GSK3β/sgg inactivation. In fact, we were able to demonstate that dMyc protein stabilization through phosphorylation is a conserved feature between Drosophila and vertebrates and requires multiple events. The final phosphorylation step, that results in a non-stable form of dMyc protein, ready to be degraded by the proteasome, is performed by GSK3β/sgg kinase (Sears, 2004). At the same time we demonstrated that CKI family of protein kinase are required to prime dMyc phosphorylation. DILPs and TOR/Nutrient signalings are known to communicate at several levels (Neufeld, 2003). For this reason we further investigated TOR contribution to dMyc-dependent growth regulation. dMyc protein accumulates in S2 cells after aminoacid stimulation, while its mRNA does not seem to be affected upon TORC1 inhibition, suggesting that the Nutrient pathway regulates dMyc mostly post-transcriptionally. In support to this hypothesis, we observed a TORC1-dependent GSK3β/sgg inactivation, further confirming a synergic effect of DILPs and Nutrients on dMyc protein stability. On the other hand, our data show that Rheb but not S6K, both downstream of the TOR kinase, contributes to the dMyc-induced growth of the eye tissue, suggesting that Rheb controls growth independently of S6K.. Moreover, Rheb seems to be able to regulate organ size during development inducing cell death, a mechanism no longer occurring in absence of dmyc. These observations suggest that Rheb might control growth through a new pathway independent of TOR/S6K but still dependent on dMyc. In order to dissect the mechanism of dMyc regulation in response to these events, we analyzed the relative contribution of Rheb, TOR and S6K to dMyc expression, biochemically in S2 cells and in vivo in morphogenetic clones and we further confirmed an interplay between Rheb and Myc that seems to be indipendent from TOR. In this work we clarified the mechanisms that stabilize dMyc protein in vitro and in vivo and we observed for the first time dMyc responsiveness to DILPs and TOR. At the same time, we discovered a new branch of the Nutrient pathway that appears to drive growth through dMyc but indipendently from TOR. We believe our work shed light on the mechanisms cells use to grow or restrain growth in presence/absence of growth promoting cues and for this reason it contributes to understand the physiology of growth control.