Capacidade de inovação: análise estrutural e o efeito moderador da organicidade da estrutura organizacional e da gestão de projetos

Este trabalho tem por objetivo revelar o inter-relacionamento envolvendo os principais determinantes da capacidade de inovação. Até hoje inexistem estudos empíricos que apresentam um modelo abrangente sobre uma base de dados em larga escala mostrando as principais rotas para o desenvolvimento da capacidade de inovação. A partir de uma revisão abrangente e sistemática da literatura, construiu-se um modelo teórico integrando os principais fatores sugeridos em artigos teóricos e de revisão. Desenvolveu-se uma escala de medição confiável e testou-se o modelo empiricamente em uma amostra de 243 firmas brasileiras de vários ramos empresariais. Os métodos utilizados incluem a análise fatorial confirmatória, equações estruturais e a análise multigrupo da invariância estrutural. Os resultados evidenciaram o efeito direto do conhecimento do cliente e do mercado, assim como da gestão estratégica da tecnologia sobre o desempenho em inovação. Ambos os fatores são afetados pela intenção estratégica de inovar e pela liderança transformadora, por meio da gestão de pessoas para inovação. A organicidade da estrutura organizacional e a gestão de projetos têm efeito moderador positivo sobre a relação entre a gestão estratégica da tecnologia e o desempenho em inovação. Esse efeito moderador, entretanto, não se revelou na relação entre o conhecimento do cliente e do mercado e o desempenho em inovação, o que foi explicado post-hoc. O valor deste estudo está na apresentação de uma escala de medição confiável e de um modelo teórico validado empiricamente que integra várias correntes de estudo e explicita como a ação da liderança pode estruturar e alavancar os recursos gerenciais para gerar e manter a capacidade da organização de inovar. Tal modelo se constitui em um road-map que pode ajudar os gerentes a desenvolver estratégias e práticas capazes de alavancar o desempenho em inovação.

Assesment of port governance in Brazil: a managerial perspective on the port of Santos

The role of maritime transportation within international trade was drastically revamped during the inception of the globalization process, which enhanced the contribution of ports in world economy as main logistics gateways for global production and trade. As a result, the relationship between ports and governments has changed. Devolution ideologies that had been applied in other industries decades ago were now being considered by governments for the port industry. Many central governments sought to extract themselves from commercial activities of ports and devolving this responsibility to local governments, communities or private entities. The institution of devolution programs also changed the governance structures of ports further influencing port performance. Consequently, the recent worldwide trend towards devolution in the port industry has spawned considerable variety of governance models that are now set in place around the world. While some countries opt for more decentralized structures others prefer to retain a centralization of powers. In this way some governments consider local features and national integration more than others, which ultimately influence the success of a port reform implementation. Nevertheless, the prime intent of governments is now to maximize the efficiency and performance of their domestic ports. This issue intends to examine the changed port governance environment in Brazil by determining how and why imposed port reforms of the Brazilian federal government have been affecting the overall performance of the national port system, over the last decades, using the Port of Santos as a sample upon an exploratory study. For that, the study will use a contingency theory-based framework – the Matching Framework - that views port performance as a function of the fit among the dimensions of external operating environment, strategy and structure of a port organization. In essence, the greater the fit among these dimensions the better the expected performance of a port will be, and vice-versa. Port managers, government officials and academics alike shall be interested in this document.

Defining student participation and empowerment in higher education

Customer participation has been studied for decades; however, it gained a postmodern perspective around the year 2000. Customers have become co-creators of personalized experiences, moving from the audience to the stage. In the educational context, students must take responsibility for their learning process and participate in the production of the service. This changing is providing opportunities and challenges for higher education institutions (HEIs) to redefine their relationship with stakeholders, especially with students. This study is based on the service dominant logic (SDL) perspective because students are assumed to take the role of co-creators of knowledge in the educational setting. The research uses adapted frameworks and concepts applied in organizational, knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) and also medical studies to advance the understanding of value co-creation in the HEI context. The current study addresses a lack of research in the higher education context focusing on defining students’ participation and students’ empowerment in higher education context. An empirical investigation was developed with traditional schools in Brazil. This investigation allowed the description of the constructs in the specific context. The description of student participation in HEIs context reflects the relevance of three dimensions – information sharing, personal interaction and responsible behavior. In the Brazilian context, responsible behavior is the weakest dimension in the construct, because the responsibilities are unbalanced between students and professors. The main reasons identified for this unbalanced relation were cultural issues and local regulation. Student empowerment was described as composed by four dimensions – meaningfulness, competence, impact and choice; however, one of them – choice – was identified as the weakest dimension, facing cultural and bureaucratic barriers for implementation in the Brazilian educational context. Moreover, interviewees spontaneously cited the idea of trust in the faculty as an important antecedent of student participation that must be considered when analyzing student participation and empowerment mechanisms. An additional contribution was the proposal of a theory-based framework for understanding the service dominant logic perspective in the HEI context, in which student participation and student empowerment were explored as mechanisms leading to positive student behavior toward institution.