Main problems with the taxation of civil society organizations in Brazil: certifications and impact on payroll

The objective of this paper is to identify and analyze the main problems in the taxation—regarding both taxes themselves and compliance costs of taxation—of civil society organizations in Brazil. This study is qualitative descriptive research. A multiple case study with 26 organizations was performed. The results show that the problems mainly affect organizations with lower revenue and that do not work in the areas of education, health or social care. The main problems involve the taxation of the payroll and the difficulties related to obtaining and maintaining certifications. The study concludes with suggestions for the improvement of the regulatory framework.

International civil society actors in Genetically Modificied Organisms as a field of struggle: a neo-gramscian study in Brazil and the United Kingdom

Since the international financial and food crisis that started in 2008, strong emphasis has been made on the importance of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) (or “transgenics”) under the claim that they could contribute to increase food productivity at a global level, as the world population is predicted to reach 9.1 billion in the year 2050 and food demand is predicted to increase by as much as 50% by 2030. GMOs are now at the forefront of the debates and struggles of different actors. Within civil society actors, it is possible to observe multiple, and sometime, conflicting roles. The role of international social movements and international NGOs in the GMO field of struggle is increasingly relevant. However, while many of these international civil society actors oppose this type of technological developments (alleging, for instance, environmental, health and even social harms), others have been reportedly cooperating with multinational corporations, retailers, and the biotechnology industry to promote GMOs. In this thesis research, I focus on analysing the role of “international civil society” in the GMO field of struggle by asking: “what are the organizing strategies of international civil society actors, such as NGOs and social movements, in GMO governance as a field of struggle?” To do so, I adopt a neo-Gramscian discourse approach based on the studies of Laclau and Mouffe. This theoretical approach affirms that in a particular hegemonic regime there are contingent alliances and forces that overpass the spheres of the state and the economy, while civil society actors can be seen as a “glue” to the way hegemony functions. Civil society is then the site where hegemony is consented, reproduced, sustained, channelled, but also where counter-hegemonic and emancipatory forces can emerge. Considering the importance of civil society actors in the construction of hegemony, I also discuss some important theories around them. The research combines, on the one hand, 36 in-depth interviews with a range of key civil society actors and scientists representing the GMO field of struggle in Brazil (19) and the UK (17), and, on the other hand, direct observations of two events: Rio+20 in Rio de Janeiro in 2012, and the first March Against Monsanto in London in 2013. A brief overview of the GMO field of struggle, from its beginning and especially focusing in the 1990s when the process of hegemonic formation became clearer, serves as the basis to map who are the main actors in this field, how resource mobilization works, how political opportunities (“historical contingencies”) are discovered and exploited, which are the main discourses (“science” and “sustainability” - articulated by “biodiversity preservation”, “food security” and “ecological agriculture”) articulated among the actors to construct a collective identity in order to attract new potential allies around “GMOs” (“nodal point”), and which are the institutions and international regulations within these processes that enable hegemony to emerge in meaningful and durable hegemonic links. This mapping indicates that that the main strategies applied by the international civil society actors are influenced by two central historical contingencies in the GMO field of struggle: 1) First Multi-stakeholder Historical Contingency; and 2) “Supposed” Hegemony Stability. These two types of historical contingency in the GMO field of struggle encompass deeper hegemonic articulations and, because of that, they induce international civil society actors to rethink the way they articulate and position themselves within the field. Therefore, depending on one of those moments, they will apply one specific strategy of discourse articulation, such as: introducing a new discourse in hegemony articulation to capture the attention of the public and of institutions; endorsing new plural demands; increasing collective visibility; facilitating material articulations; sharing a common enemy identity; or spreading new ideological elements among the actors in the field of struggle.

Law and economics in the civil law world: the case of Brazilian Courts

Conventional wisdom holds that economic analysis of law is either embryonic or nonexistent outside of the United States generally and in civil law jurisdictions in particular. Existing explanations for the assumed lack of interest in the application of economic reasoning to legal problems range from the different structure of legal education and academia outside of the United States to the peculiar characteristics of civilian legal systems. This paper challenges this view by documenting and explaining the growing use of economic reasoning by Brazilian courts. We argue that, given the ever-greater role of courts in the formulation of public policies, the application of legal principles and rules increasingly calls for a theory of human behavior (such as that provided by economics) to help foresee the likely aggregate consequences of different interpretations of the law. Consistent with the traditional role of civilian legal scholarship in providing guidance for the application of law by courts, the further development of law and economics in Brazil is therefore likely to be mostly driven by judicial demand.

Efeitos organizacionais da implantação de metas e remuneração variável por desempenho: o caso da segurança pública em Minas Gerais

Quais os efeitos práticos que a cobrança de metas provoca nas instituições e nos servidores públicos? E quando se vincula premiações financeiras a elas, qual o resultado? O Brasil vive uma onda recente de implantação de modelos de remuneração variável por desempenho no setor público. Minas Gerais universalizou o sistema em 2008, implantando o Acordo de Resultados e o Prêmio por Produtividade, já tendo gasto 1,3 bilhão de reais com o programa. Mas o otimismo dos gestores não encontra fundamento na teoria. A literatura mostra que sistemas de remuneração variável no setor público fracassam ou têm sucesso muito limitado (OCDE, 2005; Perry, Engbergs e Jun, 2009; Bowman, 2010; Weibel, Rost e Osterloh 2010). Conflitos, dificuldade de mensuração do desempenho, fraude e incapacidade de motivar servidores públicos têm direcionado experiências de incentivo ao fracasso. Alguns poucos estudos mostram que, sob certas condições, a remuneração variável por desempenho pode gerar resultados positivos (Marsden, 2010). Seria o sistema mineiro capaz de superar o pessimismo dos especialistas e alcançar resultados positivos? Quais mecanismos de fato operam quando se implementa metas e remuneração variável em instituições públicas? Este trabalho busca responder estas questões a partir do estudo de caso de três organizações da segurança pública em Minas Gerais: Polícia Militar, Polícia Civil e Corpo de Bombeiros Militar. Foram feitas 46 entrevistas com policiais, bombeiros e com a cúpula das instituições, analisados dados estatísticos – que avaliam a evolução do desempenho, observação participante e monitoramento da percepção da mídia sobre tais efeitos. O resultado mostra que metas e incentivos financeiros geraram profundas mudanças nas instituições pesquisadas. Na Polícia Civil houve crescimento da produtividade, aumento do controle e melhoria de processos internos. Entretanto, o foco na produção quantitativa de inquéritos gerou incentivos para a redução de sua qualidade. Na Polícia Militar observou-se impacto menor, uma vez que esta já havia auferido no passado recente ganhos que o uso de indicadores e metas poderia proporcionar. Ainda assim, observou-se aumento da cobrança interna de resultados. Esse fato foi um dos fatores que contribuiu para um efeito negativo importante: a reclassificação de crimes. Uma estrutura de incentivos e a ausência de obstáculos levaram alguns policiais a reclassificar crimes que tinham natureza próxima para melhorar as estatísticas de suas unidades. No Corpo de Bombeiros o impacto foi altamente positivo, levando a instituição a conceber novas estratégias, gerando ganhos importantes de produtividade e melhoria de resultados para o cidadão. O resultado mostra que metas e incentivos financeiros são muito poderosos e podem gerar resultados positivos ou negativos, dependendo da forma como são implementados. As evidências contradizem, em parte, o pessimismo dos acadêmicos e descortinam o funcionamento dos mecanismos que fazem metas e remuneração variável interferirem no resultado de organizações públicas.

A gestão em vara judicial sob a visão do juiz pro ativo

O modelo de gestão inovador mostrou que é possível fazer um ambiente de excelência onde o Poder Judiciário seja reconhecido, respeitado e confiável aos jurisdicionados, na medida em que se assegura uma prestação jurisdicional efetiva num espaço de tempo razoável, garantindo legitimidade e credibilidade às suas decisões, sob a visão de um juiz proativo, com objetivos estratégicos pré-definidos, sob um olhar idealizador, uma equipe integrada, motivada e comprometida. O modelo de gestão inovador foi experimentado na Vara do Juizado Especial Cível da Comarca de Jaru, no Estado de Rondônia, onde se procurou conferir uma rotina lógico-jurídica ao fluxo processual, sem prejuízo da qualidade, e em com total harmonia aos postulados normativos do Juizado Especial Cível e as regras constitucionais prescritas.

As metas do Conselho Nacional de Justiça e os esforços de planejamento estratégico no Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

O Poder Judiciário brasileiro tem passado por uma crise de credibilidade frente à sociedade devido a sua morosidade. Assim, com a Emenda Constitucional nº 45 do ano de 2004 foi criado o Conselho Nacional de Justiça, órgão competente pelo controle da atuação administrativa e financeira desse Poder. Desde então, observam-se esforços na gestão da justiça para profissionalizar e modernizar os Tribunais pátrios sob as diretivas deste Conselho. Este órgão instituiu no ano de 2009 o planejamento estratégico nacional com a estipulação de metas de caráter obrigatório para todos os Tribunais de Justiça do país. Desta forma, o presente estudo buscou entender quais as percepções dos magistrados e servidores sobre o cumprimento das metas impostas pelo Conselho Nacional de Justiça ao Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio de Janeiro e como tal processo influencia para reforçar o planejamento estratégico neste Tribunal. O trabalho caracteriza-se como qualitativo e descritivo e os dados foram coletados por meio de pesquisa bibliográfica e de campo. Foram realizadas entrevistas com juízes, desembargadores, secretários de juízes, diretores administrativos e serventuários, todos atuantes no TJERJ. Os resultados da pesquisa demonstram que embora não haja amplo conhecimento do planejamento estratégico em vigor ou ainda que as metas não sejam plenamente compreendidas, o fato de estarem sendo cumpridas mostra-se positivo para o planejamento do Tribunal. Todavia, tanto a prática de planejamento estratégico do CNJ consubstanciada na imposição de metas quanto o ambiente de planejamento no âmbito do TJERJ não estão em sintonia com as ideias e conceitos asseverados na literatura moderna.

Contratação de Gerentes de Projetos: relevância da certificação PMP na Construção Civil

The goal of the study was to understand the relevance of the PMP certification – Project Management Professional in the hiring process of managers within the civil construction field. In order to achieve this goal a qualitative research with interviews in 11 companies was conducted. Common patters in the hiring process of project managers in the civil construction companies were observed. Although, opposite to what previous research had shown, in this field the PMP certification is not a required hiring criteria for project managers. According to the companies the tools and knowledge proposed by PMI institute are considered as important after managers had been hired. From evidence that the nature of the activity and the organizational structure chosen by the specific company influence in the hiring criteria and also in the success of the projects, a research agenda is suggested.

Defesa e controle: uma análise da presença civil no ministério da defesa brasileiro

This thesis aims to examine the contribution of civilian presence towards the establishment of civil control over the military under civilian perspective in the Ministry of Defense. Using a qualitative approach this research aimed to present a new point of view of civil participation in the administration of the Defense folder, usually addressed through military perception. Interviews were conducted with 11 civil servants working in the Ministry in order to capture their perception on civilian participation on their field of operation. Highlighting the strong military culture present in the field, the interaction between civilian and military and the qualification and training of civilians working in the field. Evidence collected focused on the control suggest that, in contrast to the official discourse and despite the advances made in recent years, civilian control of the process still needs to progress and reach key elements in order to be deemed to be established.

Capacidades e performance dos Tribunais de Contas no Brasil

O presente estudo visa à análise da relação entre as capacidades, conforme definidas por Brinkerhoff (2010), e a performance das Cortes de Contas brasileiras. As capacidades no atual estudo se referem à quantidade de funcionários de cada Tribunal de Contas, seu orçamento, percentual de servidores do seu quadro efetivo e cumprimento das normas constitucionais quanto a sua formação. A performance foi medida pelas variáveis: “Produtividade”, ou o número de processos julgados ou apreciados pelos Ministros ou Conselheiros; “Iniciativa”, ou seja, quantidade de fiscalizações in loco realizadas; “Valor das multas e débitos imputados”, entendidas como a propensão a punir das Cortes de Contas; e “Grau de rejeição das contas de governo”, que é definida como a razão do número de pareceres prévios rejeitando as contas de governo pelo total de pareceres emitidos. A atual pesquisa parte do estudo de Melo, Pereira e Figueiredo (2009) - que identifica diversas relações entre a estrutura dos Tribunais de Contas e sua atuação - propondo novas variáveis para uma análise mais ampla e real da performance das Cortes de Contas. As hipóteses do estudo foram testadas por meio de regressão estatística utilizando o método de mínimos quadrados. Os dados foram coletados diretamente dos Tribunais de Contas. Os testes realizados confirmaram que a quantidade de recursos humanos de cada Corte influencia positivamente todas as variáveis de performance referidas anteriormente, e que quanto maior o orçamento de cada Tribunal maior sua produtividade, sua iniciativa e o valor das multas e débitos imputados. O presente estudo também comprovou que quanto maior o percentual de servidores do quadro efetivo da Corte de Contas, maior é sua produtividade, o que corrobora as teorias de Evans (2004). A partir dos dados coletados na pesquisa, foi possível verificar que o percentual médio de servidores efetivos nas Corte de Contas é de 69% enquanto nas Cortes Judiciárias esse percentual é de 89%. Isso mostra que há bastante margem para aumento da produtividade dos órgãos de contas. Conclui-se que quanto mais recursos financeiros e humanos disponíveis, e quanto maior o percentual de servidores concursados, mais os Tribunais de Contas são produtivos, sancionadores e proativos.

Transparência, a resposta institucional à pressão social: o caso do Tribunal de Contas do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

The present work aims to identify emerging organizational changes in the Court of Accounts of the State of Rio de Janeiro - TCE/RJ that are happening in the contemporary scenery known as the Age of Information. The search for the comprehension of the institutional dynamics is oriented by concepts originated from the theory of complexity, which believe that the public services external control system can be understood in a political, technical and legal environment with growing levels of learning and innovation. While chasing the possible causes of these changes, we try to prove the hypothesis that the TCE/RJ is turning into a more transparent organization. For this purpose, we define the outlines and reaches of the principle of transparency, based in bibliographical and documental researches, and analyze the phenomenon perceived in a explanation research through semi-structured interviews performed with two groups: a sample representing the universe under jurisdiction entities top level directors and the other obtained in the universe of formal and informal leaderships existing in the educational body of the institution. The conclusion of the present work confirms the initial questions, indicating that the organization is really becoming more and more transparent. The social-technical changes that are happening today at the TCE/RJ are caused by the growing social pressure for more effective results in the control of public expenditures. Under the systemic point of view, we observe cracks in the protective bell-glass that evolves the institution - previously hermetic to the external contingencies and that works today as a SAC - Adaptive Complex System. Aspects such as organization structural changes, the introduction of strategic planning and the growing democratization of the decision process are producing a new organizational culture. The seniority of the Technical Headcount contributes to establish the pre-conditions for the development of a administration where the participation of the TCE/RJ technical employees adds importance to its development as an institution that generates republican effects in the society from its less hermetic decision process.

A Defesa Judicial do Estado Brasileiro nas Varas Federais

There is no information whatsoever of a society in which there are no demands among private people and companies, among individuals and institutions, varying only the tenor and the intensity of the issues. It would be ideal if conflicts could be solved in common aggreement. The selfcomposition, yet, does not often occurr; leaving the remaining issues for a third part, i.e., the State. Up to the English and French Revolutions, political power was exercised by limitless governors and the State did not submit to the law. After those revolutions, rules are agregated to curb Absolutism and organize the State, which starts to acccomplish its duties under the law, i.e., a Law State. As a result, today, the individual can sue the State to make the State perform or not any undesirable action. In this dissertation, one traces back from the very beginning the role of the institutions in charge of defending the State in courts of law. The judicial defense of the Brazilian State in a court of law, since 1608 to the 1988 Constitution, was a role of the Public Ministry, along with other institutional functions, including prosecution. As a consequence of this ambivalence, the results of the State defense came even to be contradictory. The promulgation of the 1988 Federal Constitution adjusted this historical dualism. The 1988 Constituent embodied significant change to the concept and operationalization of a State Advocacy, confering to a new institution , which was called 'Advocacia Geral da União' or 'General Advocacy of the Union' (article 131), the judicial and extrajudicial representation of the Union. The final object of the reflections of this study is centred on the analysis of the activities of the 'General Advocacy of the Union', in its first years of functioning, in other words, from 1993 to 1999

Analysis of the restructuring of the Russian defence industry (by the example of aviation industry and knaapo) and the creation of United Aviation Construction Corporation

The present study is focused on the analysis of the three main governmental measures occurred in 2000-2006 in Russian defense industry: the creation of the holding structures, the establishing of the state monopoly in arms export, and creation of the United Aviation Construction Corporation (Ob¿edinennaya Aviastroitel¿naya Corporatziya), which was initiated by the President and Government of Russian Federation in 2006. The last project assumes the consolidation and joining of all producers of civil and military aviation into one united corporation in order to save the technological and productive potential of the sector after serious crisis in 1990-s. On the other hand, this project can be considered as one of the measures to establish state control and hierarchy in the defense industry. The current project tries to analyze the necessity and the possible impacts of restructuring processes. In order to perform such analysis, I need to observe the evolution of the sector, which involves the description of the restructuring and reforming of the industry since the disintegration of the Soviet Union. The current situation in aviation sector was shaped by number of reforms performed by Government of Russian Federation, which I describe in phases: conversion, privatization, decentralization, followed by evident desire of the state to establish control over some companies. Later on, I am trying to understand the reasons lying behind all reforms of 2000-2006 and the integration of the industry. I also try to predict which impacts on the companies it will have. The last part presents the main conclusions of the paper.

Affirmative action and interracial friendships

In two recent cases involving the University of Michigan, the Supreme Court examined whether race should be allowed to play an explicit role in the admission decisions of schools. The primary argument in these court cases and others has been that racial diversity strengthens the quality of education ofered to all students. Underlying this argument is the notion that educational benefits arise if interactions between students of different races improve preparation for life after college by, among other things, fostering mutual understanding and correcting misperceptions. A comprehensive study of this issue would ideally examine two conditions: first, whether students actually have incorrect perceptions about their friendship compatibility with students of other races at the time of college entrance; second, if misperceptions exist, whether diversity on campus is effective in changing students' beliefs about individuals of different races. In this paper we provide, to the best of our knowledge, the first direct evidence about both conditions by taking advantage of unique new data that was collected specifically for this purpose.

Concorrência no Mercosul: para além do Protocolo de Fortaleza

We address specific problems to be considered once the Protocolo de Fortaleza becomes a fully recognised agreement. Elimination of anti-dumping measures a la WTO, services competition and the interrelationship between the regulatory agencies and the competition offices, issues regarding the concept of relevant market and, in a broader view, harmonisation of rules, criteria, institutions and regional competitive environments, are discussed. The European experience, if properly adapted, can be of value. In this context, two important principles are singled-out: acknowledgement of an acquis Mercosul – which allows a realistic and constructive perspective when facing the integration challenges, and the wise use of subsidiarity, for faster developments with lighter central institutions. Dispute settlement, in the competition framework, is not tackled, though – in this case – we are favourable to the creation of a supranational organism. All these points do not naturally encompass everything required for the full implementation of a competition policy in Mercosul.

Sistema de controle interno no anteprojeto de lei orgânica da administração pública federal: percepção dos servidores da Controladoria-Regional da União no Estado de Pernambuco

O objetivo desta pesquisa foi identificar a percepção dos servidores da Controladoria- Regional da União no Estado de Pernambuco acerca das contribuições das propostas do Anteprojeto de Lei Orgânica da Administração Pública Federal para o fortalecimento do sistema de controle interno do Poder Executivo Federal, notadamente no que se refere ao momento e ao foco do controle. Para tanto, foram aplicados questionários com funcionários públicos efetivos e em exercício dessa unidade de controle interno, com índice de resposta de 92%. Concluiu-se que, na ótica desses servidores, o perfil do sistema de controle interno proposto pelo Anteprojeto, denominado por este estudo de “Posterior-Realização”, não é o mais adequado. No que se refere ao foco do controle, houve convergência entre as proposições do Anteprojeto e as opiniões dos servidores na defesa da predominância do controle de resultados, sem desprezar a averiguação da legalidade. Entretanto, no que tange ao momento do controle, enquanto os juristas defendem uma atuação predominantemente a posteriori dos órgãos de controle, os funcionários públicos apoiaram que o Controle Interno deve dispor de um eficaz planejamento das suas ações, capaz de definir o tempo mais apropriado para atuação em cada caso. Por fim, a título de contribuição com os debates trazidos pelo Anteprojeto, este estudo ainda elaborou propostas de diretrizes para o controle governamental com o intuito de serem incorporadas à Lei Orgânica da Administração Pública Federal em desenvolvimento, quais sejam: (i) momento de atuação do controle definido a partir de planejamento criterioso e (ii) atendimento ao interesse público como foco do controle.