Racionalidade e pesquisa comportamental no direito: avanço científico ou retórica?

Esse é um trabalho sobre estudos comportamentais que questionam a confiabilidade empírica das premissas de racionalidade das ciências sociais. Décadas de pesquisa comportamental vêm nos ensinando é que a grande maioria das tendências cognitivas identificadas e comprovadas, que se afastam dos pressupostos da Teoria da Escolha Racional não são de forma alguma aleatórias, mas ao invés, são sistemáticas e previsíveis. A ideia unificando esse trabalho é de que a literatura de pesquisa comportamental pode nos permitir modelar e prever comportamentos relevantes para o direito, com pressupostos mais realistas sobre o comportamento humano. No entanto, alguns pesquisadores pintam uma figura entusiástica sobre o potencial que tal pesquisa possui para informar a análise jurídica e, assim, cometem algumas desatenções ao defender generalizações não embasadas por evidências científicas, quase aproximando-se do uso de uma mera retórica. Dado esse cenário, devemos procurar garantir que a incorporação das evidências da pesquisa comportamental no discurso jurídico seja acompanhada de maior ênfase na pesquisa empírica em ambientes específicos. Esse trabalho possui três objetivos. O primeiro é analisar as diferentes concepções de racionalidade e caso elas devem manter sua posição privilegiada nas ciências sociais. O segundo é tentar entender melhor a literatura de pesquisa comportamental que questionam a validade empírica dos axiomas da Teoria da Escolha Racional. O terceiro é identificar problemas na forma pela qual a pesquisa comportamental tem sido incorporada no discurso jurídico.

A study of behavioral finance: background, theories and application

Behavioral finance, or behavioral economics, consists of a theoretical field of research stating that consequent psychological and behavioral variables are involved in financial activities such as corporate finance and investment decisions (i.e. asset allocation, portfolio management and so on). This field has known an increasing interest from scholar and financial professionals since episodes of multiple speculative bubbles and financial crises. Indeed, practical incoherencies between economic events and traditional neoclassical financial theories had pushed more and more researchers to look for new and broader models and theories. The purpose of this work is to present the field of research, still ill-known by a vast majority. This work is thus a survey that introduces its origins and its main theories, while contrasting them with traditional finance theories still predominant nowadays. The main question guiding this work would be to see if this area of inquiry is able to provide better explanations for real life market phenomenon. For that purpose, the study will present some market anomalies unsolved by traditional theories, which have been recently addressed by behavioral finance researchers. In addition, it presents a practical application of portfolio management, comparing asset allocation under the traditional Markowitz’s approach to the Black-Litterman model, which incorporates some features of behavioral finance.

Mhealth entrepreneurship: an exploratory research for a managerial model for mhealth start ups in low and middle income countries

Since some years, mobile technologies in healthcare (mHealth) stand for the transformational force to improve health issues in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although several studies have identified the prevailing issue of inconsistent evidence and new evaluation frameworks have been proposed, few have explored the role of entrepreneurship to create disruptive change in a traditionally conservative sector. I argue that improving the effectiveness of mHealth entrepreneurs might increase the adoption of mHealth solutions. Thus, this study aims at proposing a managerial model for the analysis of mHealth solutions from the entrepreneurial perspective in the context of LMICs. I identified the Khoja–Durrani–Scott (KDS) framework as theoretical basis for the managerial model, due to its explicit focus on the context of LMICs. In the subsequent exploratory research I, first, used semi-structured interviews with five specialists in mHealth, local healthcare systems and investment to identify necessary adaptations to the model. The findings of the interviews proposed that especially the economic theme had to be clarified and an additional entrepreneurial theme was necessary. Additionally, an evaluation questionnaire was proposed. In the second phase, I applied the questionnaire to five start-ups, operating in Brazil and Tanzania, and conducted semi-structured interviews with the entrepreneurs to gain practical insights for the theoretical development. Three of five entrepreneurs perceived that the results correlated with the entrepreneurs' expectations of the strengths and weaknesses of the start-ups. Main shortcomings of the model related to the ambiguity of some questions. In addition to the findings for the model, the results of the scores were analyzed. The analysis suggested that across the participating mHealth start-ups the ‘behavioral and socio-technical’ outcomes were the strongest and the ‘policy’ outcomes were the weakest themes. The managerial model integrates several perspectives, structured around the entrepreneur. In order to validate the model, future research may link the development of a start-up with the evolution of the scores in longitudinal case studies or large-scale tests.