The assessment of тт-тт selective stationary phases for two-dimensional HPLC analysis of foods : application to the analysis of coffee

Differences between alkyl, dipole–dipole, hydrogen bonding, and π-π selective surfaces represented by non-resonance and resonance π-stationary phases have been assessed for the separation of ‘Ristretto’ café espresso by employing 2DHPLC techniques with C18 phase selectivity detection. Geometric approach to factor analysis (GAFA) was used to measure the detected peaks (N), spreading angle (β), correlation, practical peak capacity (n_p) and percentage usage of the separations space, as an assessment of selectivity differences between regional quadrants of the two-dimensional separation plane. Although all tested systems were correlated to some degree to the C18 dimension, regional measurement of separation divergence revealed that performance of specific systems was better for certain sample components. The results illustrate that because of the complexity of the ‘real’ sample obtaining a truly orthogonal two-dimensional system for complex samples of natural origin may be practically impossible.

Phenyl-type and C1 stationary phases for environmentally friendlier chromatography

C1 and phenyl-type stationary phases were assessed in terms of their environmental impact on separations using as test solutes polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Methanol (MeOH) and acetonitrile (ACN) mobile-phase gradients were employed. These stationary phases were examined to determine if different physical and chemical properties possessed by these surfaces decreased the organic solvent consumption, and yet maintained peak capacity. The cumulative energy demand (CED) was used to gauge the environmental impact of the separations. The separation of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon test mixture using current methodologies (i.e. a C18/ACN combination) had a CED of 1.13 MJ-eq, and a peak capacity of 27 peaks (resolving 7 of 12 peak pairs with R_s>1). In comparison, a butyl phenyl stationary phase with a methanol mobile phase had a peak capacity of 26, but with a CED of 0.670 MJ-eq. Monolithic columns containing C18 and C1 phases were also tested. A monolithic C18 column with MeOH had the lowest CED at 0.675 MJ-eq, a peak capacity of 28 peaks and good resolving power (resolving ten peak pairs with R_s>1), suggesting that this is a viable option with respect to reducing environmental impact for these types of analyses.

Effects of π-π interactions on the separation of PAHs on phenyl-type stationary phases

Phenyl‐type stationary phase surfaces are useful for the separation of highly aromatic compounds because of the extensive intermolecular forces between the π‐electron systems. For this reason, we studied the retention behaviour and selectivity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on Synergi polar‐RP and Cosmosil 5PBB chromatography columns using methanol/water, acetonitrile/water, benzene spiked (0.5%) methanol/water, and benzene spiked (0.5%) acetonitrile/water mobile phases. These four solvent systems were employed because π‐π. interactions between the aromatic solute (i.e., PAH) and the aromatic stationary phase should be inhibited in mobile phases that are also π electron rich, and hence a competitor for the analyte. Our results showed that the acetonitrile mobile phases were substantially stronger eluents than the methanol mobile phases, which was consistent with the premise that retention of aromatic compounds is sensitive to π‐π. interactions. Aside from changes in absolute retention, selectivity of the PAHs was also generally greater in methanol rather than acetonitrile mobile phases because the methanol did not attenuate the π‐π. bonding interactions between the PAH and the stationary phase; but, despite this, the retention behaviour of the Synergi polar‐RP column was similar to that observed on C₁₈ columns. The excessive retention times of the Cosmosil 5PBB column were decreased dramatically when acetonitrile was used as the mobile phase; however, selectivity between structural isomers was lost.