Uso del Sildenafil en hipertensión pulmonar del recién nacido. Revisión sistemática de la literatura

Antecedentes El desarrollo de la hipertensión pulmonar en el recién nacido es una condición grave que supone un peligro para su vida. Se ha propuesto el uso del sildenafil como tratamiento para esta enfermedad, sin embargo no ha sido evaluada su eficacia a través de una revisión sistemática. Objetivos Determinar el efecto del sildenafil en el manejo de recién nacidos con diagnóstico de hipertensión pulmonar a través de la realización de una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Metodología Se planteó la realización de una revisión sistemática de la literatura. La búsqueda fue realizada a través de las bases de datos: Pubmed, Embase, LiLaCS y Cochrane library. Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos controlados y estudios de cohortes publicados en los idiomas inglés y español. Las variables cualitativas fueron estimadas como riesgos relativos o odds ratios con sus IC95%, las variables cualitativas como diferencias de promedios con sus IC95%. Resultados Se incluyeron 4 estudios en la revisión sistemática. Dos estudios compararon el sildenafil contra el placebo. El uso del sildenafil se relacionó con una menor mortalidad y mejoría en los parámetros ventilatorios. Conclusión: Es aconsejable el uso del sildenafil en el manejo de la hipertensión pulmonar en niños.

Evolution of clinical and functional results after arthroscopic treatment of Discoid Meniscus. A case series study of 31 cases.

Purpose: To evaluate the evolution of clinical and functional outcomes of symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus treated arthroscopically over time and to investigate the relationship between associated intra-articular findings and outcomes. Methods: Of all patients treated arthroscopically between 1995 and 2010, patients treated for symptomatic discoid meniscus were identified in the hospital charts. Baseline data (demographics, previous trauma of ipsilateral knee, and associated intra-articular findings) and medium term outcome data from clinical follow-up examinations (pain, locking, snapping and instability of the operated knee) were extracted from clinical records. Telephone interviews were conducted at long term in 28 patients (31 knees). Interviews comprised clinical outcomes as well as functional outcomes as assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC). Results: All patients underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. The mean follow-up time for data extracted from clinical records was 11 months (SD ± 12). A significant improvement was found for pain in 77% (p<0.001), locking in 13%, (p=0.045) and snapping in 39 % (p<0.005). The mean follow-up time of the telephone interview was 60 months (SD ± 43). Improvement from baseline was generally less after five years than after one year and functional outcomes of the IKDC indicated an abnormal function after surgery (IKDC mean= 84.5, SD ± 20). In some patients, 5 year-outcomes were even worse than their preoperative condition. Nonetheless, 74% of patients perceived their knee function as improved. Furthermore, better results were seen in patients without any associated intra-articular findings. Conclusions: Arthroscopical partial meniscectomy is an effective intervention to relieve symptoms in patients with discoid meniscus in the medium-term; however, results trend to deteriorate over time. A trend towards better outcome for patients with no associated intra-articular findings was observed.

Clinical prediction of occupational and non-specific low back pain

Non-specific Occupational Low Back Pain (NOLBP) is a health condition that generates a high absenteeism and disability. Due to multifactorial causes is difficult to determine accurate diagnosis and prognosis. The clinical prediction of NOLBP is identified as a series of models that integrate a multivariate analysis to determine early diagnosis, course, and occupational impact of this health condition. Objective: to identify predictor factors of NOLBP, and the type of material referred to in the scientific evidence and establish the scopes of the prediction. Materials and method: the title search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Science Direct, and Ebsco Springer, between1985 and 2012. The selected articles were classified through a bibliometric analysis allowing to define the most relevant ones. Results: 101 titles met the established criteria, but only 43 metthe purpose of the review. As for NOLBP prediction, the studies varied in relation to the factors for example: diagnosis, transition of lumbar pain from acute to chronic, absenteeism from work, disability and return to work. Conclusion: clinical prediction is considered as a strategic to determine course and prognostic of NOLBP, and to determine the characteristics that increase the risk of chronicity in workers with this health condition. Likewise, clinical prediction rules are tools that aim to facilitate decision making about the evaluation, diagnosis, prognosis and intervention for low back pain, which should incorporate risk factors of physical, psychological and social.