Markovian Processes, Two-Sided Autoregressions and Finite-Sample Inference for Stationary and Nonstationary Autoregressive Processes.

In this paper, we develop finite-sample inference procedures for stationary and nonstationary autoregressive (AR) models. The method is based on special properties of Markov processes and a split-sample technique. The results on Markovian processes (intercalary independence and truncation) only require the existence of conditional densities. They are proved for possibly nonstationary and/or non-Gaussian multivariate Markov processes. In the context of a linear regression model with AR(1) errors, we show how these results can be used to simplify the distributional properties of the model by conditioning a subset of the data on the remaining observations. This transformation leads to a new model which has the form of a two-sided autoregression to which standard classical linear regression inference techniques can be applied. We show how to derive tests and confidence sets for the mean and/or autoregressive parameters of the model. We also develop a test on the order of an autoregression. We show that a combination of subsample-based inferences can improve the performance of the procedure. An application to U.S. domestic investment data illustrates the method.

Bootstrapping Autoregressions with Conditional Heteroskedasticity of Unknown Form

Conditional heteroskedasticity is an important feature of many macroeconomic and financial time series. Standard residual-based bootstrap procedures for dynamic regression models treat the regression error as i.i.d. These procedures are invalid in the presence of conditional heteroskedasticity. We establish the asymptotic validity of three easy-to-implement alternative bootstrap proposals for stationary autoregressive processes with m.d.s. errors subject to possible conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. These proposals are the fixed-design wild bootstrap, the recursive-design wild bootstrap and the pairwise bootstrap. In a simulation study all three procedures tend to be more accurate in small samples than the conventional large-sample approximation based on robust standard errors. In contrast, standard residual-based bootstrap methods for models with i.i.d. errors may be very inaccurate if the i.i.d. assumption is violated. We conclude that in many empirical applications the proposed robust bootstrap procedures should routinely replace conventional bootstrap procedures for autoregressions based on the i.i.d. error assumption.

Les modèles vectoriels et multiplicatifs avec erreurs non-négatives de séries chronologiques.

L'objectif du présent mémoire vise à présenter des modèles de séries chronologiques multivariés impliquant des vecteurs aléatoires dont chaque composante est non-négative. Nous considérons les modèles vMEM (modèles vectoriels et multiplicatifs avec erreurs non-négatives) présentés par Cipollini, Engle et Gallo (2006) et Cipollini et Gallo (2010). Ces modèles représentent une généralisation au cas multivarié des modèles MEM introduits par Engle (2002). Ces modèles trouvent notamment des applications avec les séries chronologiques financières. Les modèles vMEM permettent de modéliser des séries chronologiques impliquant des volumes d'actif, des durées, des variances conditionnelles, pour ne citer que ces applications. Il est également possible de faire une modélisation conjointe et d'étudier les dynamiques présentes entre les séries chronologiques formant le système étudié. Afin de modéliser des séries chronologiques multivariées à composantes non-négatives, plusieurs spécifications du terme d'erreur vectoriel ont été proposées dans la littérature. Une première approche consiste à considérer l'utilisation de vecteurs aléatoires dont la distribution du terme d'erreur est telle que chaque composante est non-négative. Cependant, trouver une distribution multivariée suffisamment souple définie sur le support positif est plutôt difficile, au moins avec les applications citées précédemment. Comme indiqué par Cipollini, Engle et Gallo (2006), un candidat possible est une distribution gamma multivariée, qui impose cependant des restrictions sévères sur les corrélations contemporaines entre les variables. Compte tenu que les possibilités sont limitées, une approche possible est d'utiliser la théorie des copules. Ainsi, selon cette approche, des distributions marginales (ou marges) peuvent être spécifiées, dont les distributions en cause ont des supports non-négatifs, et une fonction de copule permet de tenir compte de la dépendance entre les composantes. Une technique d'estimation possible est la méthode du maximum de vraisemblance. Une approche alternative est la méthode des moments généralisés (GMM). Cette dernière méthode présente l'avantage d'être semi-paramétrique dans le sens que contrairement à l'approche imposant une loi multivariée, il n'est pas nécessaire de spécifier une distribution multivariée pour le terme d'erreur. De manière générale, l'estimation des modèles vMEM est compliquée. Les algorithmes existants doivent tenir compte du grand nombre de paramètres et de la nature élaborée de la fonction de vraisemblance. Dans le cas de l'estimation par la méthode GMM, le système à résoudre nécessite également l'utilisation de solveurs pour systèmes non-linéaires. Dans ce mémoire, beaucoup d'énergies ont été consacrées à l'élaboration de code informatique (dans le langage R) pour estimer les différents paramètres du modèle. Dans le premier chapitre, nous définissons les processus stationnaires, les processus autorégressifs, les processus autorégressifs conditionnellement hétéroscédastiques (ARCH) et les processus ARCH généralisés (GARCH). Nous présentons aussi les modèles de durées ACD et les modèles MEM. Dans le deuxième chapitre, nous présentons la théorie des copules nécessaire pour notre travail, dans le cadre des modèles vectoriels et multiplicatifs avec erreurs non-négatives vMEM. Nous discutons également des méthodes possibles d'estimation. Dans le troisième chapitre, nous discutons les résultats des simulations pour plusieurs méthodes d'estimation. Dans le dernier chapitre, des applications sur des séries financières sont présentées. Le code R est fourni dans une annexe. Une conclusion complète ce mémoire.

Quadratic M-Estimators for ARCH-Type Processes

This paper addresses the issue of estimating semiparametric time series models specified by their conditional mean and conditional variance. We stress the importance of using joint restrictions on the mean and variance. This leads us to take into account the covariance between the mean and the variance and the variance of the variance, that is, the skewness and kurtosis. We establish the direct links between the usual parametric estimation methods, namely, the QMLE, the GMM and the M-estimation. The ususal univariate QMLE is, under non-normality, less efficient than the optimal GMM estimator. However, the bivariate QMLE based on the dependent variable and its square is as efficient as the optimal GMM one. A Monte Carlo analysis confirms the relevance of our approach, in particular, the importance of skewness.

Aggregations and Marginalization of GARCH and Stochastic Volatility Models

The GARCH and Stochastic Volatility paradigms are often brought into conflict as two competitive views of the appropriate conditional variance concept : conditional variance given past values of the same series or conditional variance given a larger past information (including possibly unobservable state variables). The main thesis of this paper is that, since in general the econometrician has no idea about something like a structural level of disaggregation, a well-written volatility model should be specified in such a way that one is always allowed to reduce the information set without invalidating the model. To this respect, the debate between observable past information (in the GARCH spirit) versus unobservable conditioning information (in the state-space spirit) is irrelevant. In this paper, we stress a square-root autoregressive stochastic volatility (SR-SARV) model which remains true to the GARCH paradigm of ARMA dynamics for squared innovations but weakens the GARCH structure in order to obtain required robustness properties with respect to various kinds of aggregation. It is shown that the lack of robustness of the usual GARCH setting is due to two very restrictive assumptions : perfect linear correlation between squared innovations and conditional variance on the one hand and linear relationship between the conditional variance of the future conditional variance and the squared conditional variance on the other hand. By relaxing these assumptions, thanks to a state-space setting, we obtain aggregation results without renouncing to the conditional variance concept (and related leverage effects), as it is the case for the recently suggested weak GARCH model which gets aggregation results by replacing conditional expectations by linear projections on symmetric past innovations. Moreover, unlike the weak GARCH literature, we are able to define multivariate models, including higher order dynamics and risk premiums (in the spirit of GARCH (p,p) and GARCH in mean) and to derive conditional moment restrictions well suited for statistical inference. Finally, we are able to characterize the exact relationships between our SR-SARV models (including higher order dynamics, leverage effect and in-mean effect), usual GARCH models and continuous time stochastic volatility models, so that previous results about aggregation of weak GARCH and continuous time GARCH modeling can be recovered in our framework.

ARMA Representation of Integrated and Realized Variances

This paper derives the ARMA representation of integrated and realized variances when the spot variance depends linearly on two autoregressive factors, i.e., SR SARV(2) models. This class of processes includes affine, GARCH diffusion, CEV models, as well as the eigenfunction stochastic volatility and the positive Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models. We also study the leverage effect case, the relationship between weak GARCH representation of returns and the ARMA representation of realized variances. Finally, various empirical implications of these ARMA representations are considered. We find that it is possible that some parameters of the ARMA representation are negative. Hence, the positiveness of the expected values of integrated or realized variances is not guaranteed. We also find that for some frequencies of observations, the continuous time model parameters may be weakly or not identified through the ARMA representation of realized variances.

Short run and long run causality in time series: Inference

We propose methods for testing hypotheses of non-causality at various horizons, as defined in Dufour and Renault (1998, Econometrica). We study in detail the case of VAR models and we propose linear methods based on running vector autoregressions at different horizons. While the hypotheses considered are nonlinear, the proposed methods only require linear regression techniques as well as standard Gaussian asymptotic distributional theory. Bootstrap procedures are also considered. For the case of integrated processes, we propose extended regression methods that avoid nonstandard asymptotics. The methods are applied to a VAR model of the U.S. economy.

An Autoregressive Spectral Density Estimator at Frequency Zero for Nonstationarity Tests.

Many unit root and cointegration tests require an estimate of the spectral density function at frequency zero at some process. Kernel estimators based on weighted sums of autocovariances constructed using estimated residuals from an AR(1) regression are commonly used. However, it is known that with substantially correlated errors, the OLS estimate of the AR(1) parameter is severely biased. in this paper, we first show that this least squares bias induces a significant increase in the bias and mean-squared error of kernel-based estimators.