55 resultados para Michel Foucault. Sociology. Domination. Power. Social theory. Subject
em Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland
Resumo:
This study examines information security as a process (information securing) in terms of what it does, especially beyond its obvious role of protector. It investigates concepts related to ‘ontology of becoming’, and examines what it is that information securing produces. The research is theory driven and draws upon three fields: sociology (especially actor-network theory), philosophy (especially Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s concept of ‘machine’, ‘territory’ and ‘becoming’, and Michel Serres’s concept of ‘parasite’), and information systems science (the subject of information security). Social engineering (used here in the sense of breaking into systems through non-technical means) and software cracker groups (groups which remove copy protection systems from software) are analysed as examples of breaches of information security. Firstly, the study finds that information securing is always interruptive: every entity (regardless of whether or not it is malicious) that becomes connected to information security is interrupted. Furthermore, every entity changes, becomes different, as it makes a connection with information security (ontology of becoming). Moreover, information security organizes entities into different territories. However, the territories – the insides and outsides of information systems – are ontologically similar; the only difference is in the order of the territories, not in the ontological status of entities that inhabit the territories. In other words, malicious software is ontologically similar to benign software; they both are users in terms of a system. The difference is based on the order of the system and users: who uses the system and what the system is used for. Secondly, the research shows that information security is always external (in the terms of this study it is a ‘parasite’) to the information system that it protects. Information securing creates and maintains order while simultaneously disrupting the existing order of the system that it protects. For example, in terms of software itself, the implementation of a copy protection system is an entirely external addition. In fact, this parasitic addition makes software different. Thus, information security disrupts that which it is supposed to defend from disruption. Finally, it is asserted that, in its interruption, information security is a connector that creates passages; it connects users to systems while also creating its own threats. For example, copy protection systems invite crackers and information security policies entice social engineers to use and exploit information security techniques in a novel manner.
Resumo:
The groups within Finnish vocational upper secondary education and training (VET) are often heterogeneous with respect to the student's need for support in their studies. According to the national core curricula, Special Education Needs (SEN) students should in the first place, get their education in the same group as everyone else. This dissertation aims to clarify and create an understanding about how the ideals and intention of equality in education is constructed in communication among teachers in VET in the Swedish-speaking parts of Finland. Through this understanding it should be possible to highlight a potential which could ultimately contribute to a positive development of a more inclusive education within VET. The epistemological platform of the study is to be found within the post structuralist philosophy of language that is considered as subsumed in a social constructionist thinking. The data has been collected through focus group discussions in groups of 3–6 participants (teachers) in seven schools in Finnish-Swedish VET. The analyses are based on a discursive psychological analysis combined with an analysis based on Michel Foucault's concepts with an emphasis on the subject, government and power. Four discourser where identified in the analysis of teachers' constructions of the educational assignment in relation to SEN students. The most dominant was discussing the educational assignment as a pragmatic project i.e. as a matter of transmission of knowledge. The discourse included both interpretative repertoires where the heterogeneous group was constructed as self-evident and possible to manage as well as a constructed as an impossible project. The educational assignment was also constructed as a holistic project, as part of a democratic project, and as a labor market project. Each discourse contains both including as well as excluding features in relation to SEN students. The development of an inclusive practice can and should therefore include elements from all of them. Three discourses were identified in the analysis concerning teachers' versions of SEN students: students with difficulties and problems; students who do not use or do not have ability and students who are irresponsible and lack the will to study. Within the various discourses and interpretative repertoires were both constructs when teachers described a concern and kindness in relation to the individual SEN student and constructions where teachers mainly expressed fears that other students in the group would be negatively affected by students in need of special support. Results from the third research question conclude the results from the two others, the analysis is done out of a government perspective. In the material use of different government techniques are identified: disciplinary power through direct reprimands; pastoral power by a desire of insight in order to promote the opportunities for consultation and the use of bio-power that primarily focuses on what is best for the population and whose tool racism results in a legitimation of the exclusion of SEN students. The conclusion is that teachers in VET need to pay attention to inclusive and exclusive elements identified in various discourses.
Resumo:
Ylläpitääkseen kilpailuetua ja menestyäkseen markkinoilla yritysten tulee teknologisen ja liiketoimintaosaamisen lisäksi hallita tehokas sisäinen toimintansa. Tieto on tärkein tuotannontekijä ja sen jakaminen yrityksessä onkriittistä innovaatioiden syntymisen kannalta. Luottamus edistää tiedon luomista ja jakamista. Luottamusta yrityksissä on tutkittu pääasiassa henkilöiden välisenä luottamuksena omiin esimiehiin ja kollegoihin. Kansainvälisistä omistaja- jamuista yritysjärjestelyistä johtuen yritysten sisäinenkin toiminta on usein maantieteellisesti hajautettua, mikä vähentää henkilöiden välisten luottamussuhteiden syntymistä. Tällaisissa tilanteissa yritykseen itseensä kohdistuva ei-henkilöityvä luottamus täydentää tutkimusten mukaan vähäisiä henkilöiden välisiä luottamussuhteita. Yrityksen ei-henkilöityvää luottamusta on tutkittu vain vähän ja kokonaisvaltaista teoriapohjaista ja/tai empiiristä tutkimusta ei ole tehty tai sitä ei ole raportoitu. Tässä pro gradu -tutkielmassa tutkittiin, mitä yrityksen institutionaalinen luottamus on ja mistä se muodostuu. Tutkielman teoriatausta nousee sosiologian, taloustieteen ja sosiaalipsykologian eri teorioista sekä aikaisemmasta monitieteisestä luottamustutkimuksesta. Empiirinen aineisto kerättiin neljässä fokusryhmäkeskustelussa ja aineisto analysoitiin sekä aineistolähtöisesti että teoriaohjaavasti hyödyntäen ATLAS.ti kvalitatiivisen aineiston analyysiohjelmaa. Työn keskeisenä tuloksena oli teorian ja empirian synteesinä muodostunutyrityksen institutionaalisen luottamuksen määritelmä. Yrityksen institutionaalisella luottamuksella tarkoitetaan yksilön odotuksia työnantajayrityksen kyvykkyydelle ja oikeudenmukaisuudelle. Kyvykkyydellä tarkoitetaan yrityksen havaittua kyvykkyyttä menestyä markkinoilla jatkuvasti ja organisoida sisäinen toimintansa tehokkaasti ja varmasti. Oikeudenmukaisuudella tarkoitetaan koettua oikeudenmukaista henkilöstöpolitiikkaa ja hyvää työnantajamainetta.
Resumo:
Kirjallisuusarvostelu
Resumo:
Kirjallisuusarvostelu
Resumo:
Kirjallisuusarvostelu
Resumo:
Kirjallisuusarvostelu