Biomarkers, medical treatment and fetal intrapartum surveillance in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy-specific disorder characterized by maternal pruritus and elevated liver enzymes. It usually begins in the third trimester of pregnancy and resolves spontaneously after delivery. ICP is considered benign for the pregnant woman, but it is associated with an increased risk for unexplained term stillbirth and preterm delivery. There are no specific laboratory markers to diagnose ICP. The diagnosis is currently based on the presence of maternal pruritus and elevated values of alanine aminotransaminases (ALT) and serum bile acids (BA). Recently, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been used for treatment. Mechanisms leading to intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) may be multifactorial and are unknown at present. For this thesis, 415 pregnant women with ICP were studied. The aim was to evaluate the value of the liver enzyme glutathione S-transferase alpha (GSTA) as a specific marker of ICP and to assess the effect of maternal UDCA therapy on maternal laboratory values and fetal outcome. The specific markers predisposing the fetus to heart arrhythmia were studied by comparing waveform analysis of fetal electrocardiograms (FECG) during labor in pregnancies complicated by ICP with controls. The levels of maternal GSTA were high and the values correlated with the value of ALT in patients with ICP. UDCA therapy reduced the values of the liver enzymes and alleviated maternal pruritus, but it did not influence maternal hormonal values. Although the newborns experienced an uneventful perinatal outcome, severe ICP was still associated with preterm birth and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). There were no significant differences in intrapartum FECG findings between fetuses born to ICP women and controls.

Sedentary behaviour and health with special reference to obesity and fatty liver in early midlife. The Cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study

Background: Physical inactivity and positive energy balance pose a risk to health. They increase the risk of obesity and associated non-communicable diseases. Recently, also sedentary behaviour has been associated with obesity and non-communicable diseases. Nevertheless, it has been unclear which type of sedentary behaviour is the most harmful. It is also unknown whether the relationship of sedentary behaviour with obesity is truly independent of other factors, for example physical activity and diet. Longitudinal data are limited, and the direction of causality and the mechanism of action are still unknown. Aims: The aim of this study was 1) to identify the type of sedentary behaviour having the strongest association with obesity, 2) to explore the causal relationship of sedentary behaviour and weight increase, and 3) to additionally, investigate the relationship of sedentary behaviour with fatty liver. These were studied in cross-sectional and/or longitudinal settings using data from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Special emphasis was put on the evaluation of a wide range of other lifestyle factors and risks for obesity and fatty liver. Subjects: 2,060 subjects (aged 33-50 years in 2011, of which 55 % were female) from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study participating in follow-ups in 2001, 2007, and 2011. Measures: Self-reported time spent in various types of sedentary behaviour (I), or TV viewing time (I-III). Measured body weight, height and waist circumference (I-III), and genetic variants for high BMI (I). Fasting plasma concentrations of gamma-glutamyltransferase enzyme and triglyceride, calculated Fatty Liver Index (based on gamma-glutamyltransferase and triglyceride concentration, BMI and waist circumference), and the amount of intrahepatic fat measured with ultrasound (III). Self-reported leisure-time physical activity and active commuting, occupational physical activity, energy intake, diet, alcohol consumption, smoking, socioeconomic status, and sleep duration as possible confounders were considered (I-III). Results: TV viewing is the sedentary behaviour type that has the strongest association with obesity. Sedentary behaviour (TV viewing) precedes weight increase, and not the other way around. Sedentary behaviour (TV viewing) is associated with increased risk of fatty liver. Conclusions: Sedentary behaviour (especially high TV viewing time) is associated with increased risks of obesity and fatty liver. Intervention studies are needed to assess whether reduction of TV time would prevent obesity and fatty liver.