Ethnic sensitive substance abuse work : services for non-Finnish speaking clients in substance abuse treatment units in Finland today

The purpose of this study was to examine the current situation in substance abuse treatment units in Finland in taking non-Finnish speaking clients into consideration. The initiative for this research came from the Development of Alcohol and Drugs Intervention group at Stakes (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health). Their aim was to gather information about the functioning and relevance of the quality assessment forms based on the quality recommendations for substance abuse work, filled in by substance abuse treatment units. The ethnic issue was chosen as the main approach in the study. The aim of this research was to answer the following questions: what is the readiness and competence in substance abuse treatment units in Finland to receive and encounter non-Finnish speaking clients, how is the quality of these services assessed and/or developed in the units, and what has been the role and functioning of the quality recommendations and quality assessment forms in working with non-Finnish speaking clients. The research methods used in the study were both quantitative and qualitative. The information concerning language services provided in the units was gathered from the quality assessment forms and basic information forms found in the database maintained by Stakes. The total amount of units found in the database was 267. In addition to that, semi-structured theme-interviews were carried out in four substance abuse treatment units in order to get a more deep understanding of how the services function in practice. The few number of non-Finnish speaking clients in the units may explain to a certain degree the results of the research. The results however showed that there is still space for improving the services. In the light of quality recommendations, the degree of language options provided in substance abuse treatment units in Finland today is low. Also the quantity of interpreter services provided in the units is scarce. There could also be unified guidelines specially tailored for substance abuse treatment units on how to work with ethnic minorities, as the knowledge is currently adopted from several different instances. The quality recommendations as well as quality assessment forms were valued and applied in the units appropriately and were also perceived to have an effect on the functioning, and quality, in the units.

The role of diaspora networks in opportunity exploitation by ethnic entrepreneurs in Finland

The thesis explores the role of diaspora network in opportunity exploitation by ethnic entrepreneurs in Finland. The purpose of this study is to how ethnic entrepreneurs in Finland can exploit diaspora networks and how significant support of these networks in comparison with governmental and other official institutional support. Increased mobility of the global population and number of immigrants all around the world contribute into interest of academics to this topic. At the same time, in comparison with other European countries for Finland this phenomenon is new. However, increasing number of immigrants add to academic interest to this topic. The theoretical background of this thesis consists of the collection of studies done on diaspora networks and ethnic entrepreneurs as internationally as in Finland. The concept of cooperation between diaspora and ethnic entrepreneurs describes how diaspora can support ethnic entrepreneur and emphasize importance of diaspora ties for business. At the end of the theoretical section theoretical a special grid was proposed as summary of the academic literature review. The empirical research for this study is based on the interviews with five ethnic entrepreneurs in Finland. Empirical data was analyzed and compared with the similar studies done internationally. During the interviews analyses were stressed aspects of the significance of governmental and other official institutional support. During the interviews analyses were stressed aspects of the significance of the governmental and other official institutional support. According to the main findings diaspora can play positive and in some cases crucial role in the business of ethnic entrepreneurs in Finland. Moreover, diaspora can be a facilitator of internationalization of ethnic entrepreneurs. At the same time, there are several factors which might increase or decrease role of diaspora. The ways of the utilization of diaspora network were combined in the empirical grid. The study enhance understanding of the challenges of ethnic entrepreneurs and provides certain recommendations for the policy makers, ethnic entrepreneurs and managers of official institutions involved in cooperation with ethnic entrepreneurs

Vihollisia, vainoojia, syöpäläisiä : venäläisviha Suomessa 1917-1923

English summary: Foes, fiends and vermin : ethnic hatred of Russians in Finland 1917-1923

Kultaisen valtaistuimen varkaus

Abstract

Sosiaalityö ja maahanmuuttajat. Lastensuojelun ammattilaisten ja asiakkaiden vuorovaikutus ja tulkinnat

Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli tuottaa tietoa siitä, mitä maahanmuuttajia koskevat erityiskysymykset suomalaisessa lastensuojelun sosiaalityössä ovat ja miten näitä kysymyksiä lastensuojelussa käsitellään. Teoreettismetodologisena viitekehyksenä on sosiaalinen konstruktionismi. Etnisten suhteiden tutkimusperinteessä työ paikantuu keskusteluun, jossa kulttuuri ja etnisyys nähdään sosiaalisesti rakentuvina ja muuntuvina. Analyysissä sovelletaan diskurssianalyyttistä metodologiaa. Tutkimus rakentuu yhteenveto-osiosta ja neljästä artikkelista. Maahanmuuttajasosiaalityötä ja lastensuojelua tarkastellaan sosiaalityöntekijöiden, muiden ammattilaisten ja asiakkaiden kielenkäytön kautta. Aineisto koostuu 11 lastensuojelun asiakaskeskustelusta ja niiden jälkeen keskustelun osapuolille tehdyistä haastatteluista, joita on yhteensä 35. Tutkimuksessa analysoidaan seuraavia kysymyksiä: Miten sosiaalityöntekijät tulkitsevat maahanmuuttajasosiaalityön erityisyyttä oman ammatillisen tehtävänsä näkökulmasta? Minkälaisia ominaisuuksia sosiaalityöntekijät rakentavat maahanmuuttaja-asiakkaille? Miten lastensuojelun keskusteluissa puhutaan monikulttuurisuuteen liittyvistä teemoista, kuten erilaisuudesta ja samanlaisuudesta sekä kulttuuri- ja rasismikysymyksistä? Miten maahanmuuttajalasten ja -nuorten osallisuus lastensuojelun asiakaskeskusteluissa rakentuu aikuisten ja lasten itsensä tuottamana? Mitä ja miten maahanmuuttajalapset ja -nuoret puhuvat kokemuksistaan lastensuojelussa ja suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa? Maahanmuuttajien erityiskysymyksiä ovat kieleen, kulttuuriin ja valtayhteiskunnan toimintaan liittyvät ymmärtämisvaikeudet, kokemukset arkipäivän rasismista sekä perheen ja yhteisön merkittävä, osin ristiriitainen rooli. Lapsilla ja nuorilla kulttuuri on muuntuvaa ja jatkuvien neuvottelujen kohteena. Aineiston lastensuojelutilanteiden taustalla on usein kouluympäristöön liittyviä vaikeuksia. Haastatteluissa lapset kertovat kokemuksistaan ja toimijuudestaan perheeseen, yhteisöön ja kouluun paikantuvissa tilanteissa. Asiakaskeskusteluissa lasten puhuja-asema on usein heikko, jos aikuiset eivät aktiivisesti vahvista sitä. Jotkut lapset ottavat itse vahvan puhuja-aseman. Asiakaskeskusteluissa maahanmuuttajien erityiskysymyksistä puhutaan harvoin eksplisiittisesti. Haastatteluissa sosiaalityöntekijät enemmän tai vähemmän tietoisesti paikantavat maahanmuuttajasosiaalityötä vieraannuttavaan, sopeuttavaan, tasa-arvoistavaan, kulttuuritietoiseen, rasismitietoiseen ja osallistavaan kehykseen. Kehykset nostavat sosiaalityön tavoitteista, menetelmistä ja asiakkaasta keskeisiksi erilaisia asioita. Tulkinnat ovat muuntuvia, vaikka osoittavat myös tiettyä säännönmukaisuutta. Kulttuuri on keskeinen käsite erilaisuuden ja samanlaisuuden ymmärtämiseksi. Sekä työntekijät että asiakkaat perustelevat toivottavia elämäntapoja "omalla kulttuurillaan" ja selittävät ongelmia ”erilaisella kulttuurilla”. Kulttuurin käsitettä voidaan myös käyttää työvälineenä asiakaskeskusteluissa avattaessa asiakkaan omaa näkökulmaa korostavaa dialogia. Perheen ja kulttuurisen yhteisön merkitys on tärkeää arvioida lapsen ja nuoren hyvinvoinnin ja kulttuurisen identiteetin kehittymisen näkökulmasta. Sosiaalityöntekijöillä on merkittävä välittäjän rooli yhtäältä valtayhteiskunnan ja maahanmuuttaja-asiakkaiden, toisaalta vanhempien, yhteisöjen sekä lasten ja nuorten välillä. Lastensuojelussa haasteena on arkipäivän rasismin tiedostaminen sekä siihen pureutuvien työmenetelmien kehittäminen.

Venäläisvetoinen yrittäjyys Suomessa

Venäjän maantieteellinen läheisyys ja kasvavat markkinat ovat yhä edelleen tärkeimpiä syitä suomalaisyritysten Venäjä-toiminnoille. Vuorovaikutus rajan yli ei kuitenkaan ole yksipuolista, vaan maantieteellisen läheisyyden vuoksi myös venäläisyritysten voisi olettaa pitävän Suomea luonnollisena vaihtoehtona kansainvälistymiselleen. Suomessa toimivissa venäläisyrityksissä on havaittavissa ominaispiirteitä, jotka erottavat ne kotimaisesta yritystoiminnasta. Samalla kuitenkin venäläisyritysten piirteet eivät ole yhteneviä muualla maailmassa havaittujen etnisten yritysten ominaisuuksien kanssa. Toisin kuin etniset yritykset yleensä, venäläiset yritykset eivät ole syntyneet julkisen tuen avustuksella, eivätkä ne toimi matalan kannattavuuden aloilla. Venäläisen yritystoiminnan rooli on merkittävä Suomen ja Venäjän välisessä kaupassa, ja samalla se tuo lisämausteensa suomalaiseen pienyrityskenttään.

American Indians of the Southwest

Recorded in Indian communities by Willard Rhodes, with the cooperation of the United States Office of Indian Affairs.

Saako historiasta selvää? Monikulttuuriset yläkoululaiset historian lähteillä historian taidot motiivien, seurauksien, historian tulkintojen ja lähteiden luotettavuuden arvioinneissa

The research assesses the skills of upper comprehensive school pupils in history. The focus is on locating personal motives, assessing wider reasons hidden in historical sources and evaluating source reliability. The research also questions how a wide use of multiple sources affects pupils’ holistic understanding of historical phenomena. The participants were a multicultural group of pupils. The origins of their cultures can be traced to the Balkan, the Middle East, Asia and Europe. The number of native Finnish speakers and pupils speaking Finnish as their second language was almost equal. The multicultural composition provides opportunities to assess how culturally responsive learning history from sources is. The intercultural approach to learning in a multicultural setting emphasizes equality as a precondition for learning. In order to set assignments at least to some extent match with all participants only those answers were taken into account which were produced by pupils who had studied history for a similar period of time in the Finnish comprehensive school system. Due to the small number of participants (41), the study avoids wide generalizations. Nevertheless, possible cultural blueprints in pupils’ way of thinking are noted. The first test examined the skills of pupils to find motives for emigration. The results showed that for 7th graders finding reasons is not a problematic task. However, the number of reasons noticed and justifications varied. In addition, the way the pupils explained their choices was a distinguishing factor. Some pupils interpreted source material making use of previous knowledge on the issue, while other pupils based their analysis solely on the text handed and did not try to add their own knowledge. Answers were divided into three categories: historical, explanatory and stating. Historical answers combined smoothly previously learned historical knowledge to one’s own source analysis; explanatory answers often ignored a wider frame, although they were effective when explaining e.g. historical concepts. The stating answers only noticed motives from the sources and made no attempts to explain them historically. Was the first test culturally responsive? All pupils representing different cultures tackled the first source exam successfully, but there were some signs of how historical concepts are understood in a slightly different way if the pupil’s personal history has no linkage to the concepts under scrutiny. The second test focused on the history of Native Americans. The test first required pupils to recognize whether short source extracts (5) were written by Indians or Caucasians. Based on what they had already learned from North American history, the pupils did not find it hard to distinguish between the sources. The analysis of multiphase causes and consequences of the disputes between Native Americans and white Americans caused dispersion among pupils. Using two historical sources and combining historical knowledge from both of them simultaneously was cumbersome for many. The explanations of consequences can be divided into two groups: the ones emphasizing short term consequences and those placing emphasis on long term consequences. The short term approach was mainly followed by boys in every group. The girls mainly paid attention to long term consequences. The result suggests that historical knowledge in sources is at least to some extent read through role and gender lenses. The third test required pupils to explain in their own words how the three sources given differed in their account of living conditions in Nazi Germany, which turned out to be demanding for many pupils. The pupils’ stronghold was rather the assessment of source reliability and accounts why the sources approached the same events differently. All participants wrote critical and justified comments on reliability and aspects that might have affected the content of the sources. The pupils felt that the main reasons that affected source reliability were the authors’ ethnic background, nationality and profession. The assessment showed that pupils were well aware that position in a historical situation has an impact on historical accounts, but in certain cases the victim’s account was seen as a historical truth. The account of events by a historian was chosen most often as the most reliable source, but it was often justified leniently with an indication to professionalism rather than with clear ideas of how historians conduct accounts based on sources. In brief, the last source test demonstrates that pupils have a strong idea that the ethnicity or nationalism determines how people explained events of the past. It is also an implication that pupils understand how historical knowledge is interpretative. The results also imply that history can be analyzed from a neutral perspective. One’s own membership in an ethnical or religious group does not automatically mean that a person’s cultural identity excludes historical explanations if something in them contradicts with his or her identity. The second method of extracting knowledge of pupils’ historical thinking was an essay analysis. The analysis shows that an analytical account of complicated political issues, which often include a great number of complicated political concepts, leads more likely to an inconsistent structure in the written work of pupils. The material also demonstrates that pupils have a strong tendency to take a critical stance when assessing history. Historical empathy in particular is shown if history somehow has a linkage to young people, children or minorities. Some topics can also awake strong feelings, especially among pupils with emigrant background, if there is a linkage between one’s own personal history and that of the school; and occasionally a student’s historical experience or thoughts replaced school history. Using sources during history lessons at school seems to have many advantages. It enhances the reasoning skills of pupils and their skills to assess the nature of historical knowledge. Thus one of the main aims and a great benefit of source work is to encourage pupils to express their own ideas and opinions. To conclude, when assessing the skills of adolescents in history - their work with sources, comments on history, historical knowledge and finally their historical thinking - one should be cautious and avoid cut off score evaluations. One purpose of pursuing history with sources is to encourage pupils to think independently, which is a useful tool for further identity construction. The idea that pupils have the right to conduct their own interpretations of history can be partially understood as part of a wider learning process, justification to study history comes from extrinsic reasons. The intrinsic reason is history itself; in order to understand history one should have a basic understanding of history as a specific domain of knowledge. Using sources does not mean that knowing history is of secondary importance. Only a balance between knowing the contextual history, understanding basic key concepts and working with sources is a solid base to improve pupils’ historical understanding.

Etnistä identiteettiä luomassa Euroopan rajoilla

Kirjallisuusarvostelu