Starting Insulin Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is a disorder of glucose metabolism characterized by chronic hyperglycemia. Initially type 2 diabetes is characterized by insulin resistance and impaired function of beta cells, leading progressively to insulin deficiency. Type 2 diabetes is treated with diet and other lifestyle changes, and with medication modulating e.g. insulin resistance, liver glucose production and insulin secretion. Injectable insulin is added to the treatment when lifestyle changes and other medication are insufficient to maintain adequate control of hyperglycemia. The aim of the treatment is to remove the symptoms of diabetes and to prevent late complications of diabetes. Insulin was traditionally started at hospital wards, but from the early 1990’s also in outpatient care. The first substudy of this thesis examined retrospectively initiation practices and how successfully insulin treatment was introduced in 1990 – 1996 in Southwestern Finland. This study aimed also at identifying the best methods of controlling plasma glucose. It showed that in the 1990’s the incidence of insulin treatment increased and was initiated more often in outpatient care than previously. The use of combination treatment also increased, first with sulfonylureas and later with metformin as the oral drug. In combination therapy the insulin dose was smaller than with insulin monotherapy. HbA1c improved similarly in middle-aged and older age groups. Weight increase associated with insulin initiation was smaller when combined with oral agents. A prospective insulin initiation study (1994 – 1998) tested the hypothesis that hyperglycemia (fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia) may affect the outcome of insulin initiation. The type of hyperglycemia was determined by the relation of fasting plasma glucose to HbA1c. Treatment was initiated with insulin Lente or human NPH insulin. In patients treated with insulin monotherapy twice daily the decline in HbA1c was markedly greater for postprandial than fasting hyperglycemia patients suggesting that hyperglycemia type has significance in the selection of the insulin regimen. Another insulin initiation study showed that patients with fasting hyperglycemia starting on insulin (2004-2005) were significantly more prone to overweight than patients with postprandial hyperglycemia. Irrespective of the insulin preparation (insulin NPH or insulin glargine), patients with fasting hyperglycemia had a greater weight increase compared to patients with postprandial hyperglycemia. Special attention should be paid to prevention of weight increase in these patients.

Metformin in gestational diabetes mellitus

METFORMIININ KÄYTTÖ RASKAUSDIABETEKSESSA Raskausdiabeteksella tarkoitetaan sokeriaineenvaihdunnan häiriötä, joka todetaan ensimmäisen kerran raskauden aikana. Hoidolla voidaan vähentää raskausdiabetekseen liittyviä äidin ja vastasyntyneen haittoja. Lääkitystä tarvitaan, jos ruokavaliohoidolla ei saavuteta hyvää sokeritasapainoa. Perinteisesti lääkityksenä on käytetty insuliinia, mutta metformii¬nin käyttöä insuliinin vaihtoehtona on ehdotettu. Metformiini läpäisee istukan, mutta sen läpäisymekanismi ei ole selvillä. Tämän tutkimuskokonaisuuden pääasiallisin tarkoitus oli verrata metformiinin tehokkuutta ja turvallisuutta insuliiniin raskausdiabeteksen hoidossa selvittämällä lääkkeen vaiku¬tusta äitiin ja vastasyntyneeseen. Lisäksi haluttiin tutkia, mitkä tekijät ennustavat insulii¬nin tarvetta metformiinin lisänä, jotta saavutettaisiin hyvä sokeritasapaino. Metformiinin annoksen vaikutus äitiin ja vastasyntyneeseen arvioitiin mittaamalla metformiinin pitoisuus äidistä, ja sikiön puolelta napanuoran veressä. Tässä tutkimuksessa selvitettiin myös aktiivisen kuljetusproteiinin (OCT) merkitystä metformiinin kulkeutumiseen istukan läpi perfusiomalla istukkaa ex vivo . Ex vivo istukkaperfuusiotutkimuksen tulokset viittasivat siihen, että OCT-kuljetusproteiinilla ei ollut todennäköisesti merkittävää osuutta metformiinin kulkeutumisessa istukan läpi. Metformiinin pitoisuusmittaukset synnytyksen yhteydessä osoittivat metformiinin siirtyvän sikiöön istukan läpi suuressa määrin (96 %) kertymättä kuitenkaan sikiön verenkiertoon. Metformiinin pitoisuudella ei ollut vaikutusta vastasyntyneen hyvinvointiin. Maksi¬maalisella metformiinin annostuksella ja korkealla metformiinipitoisuudella todettiin olevan suotuisa vaikutus äidin painon nousuun raskauden aikana. Insuliiniin verrattuna metformiini ei lisännyt äidin, sikiön tai vastasyntyneen haittatapahtumia, eikä sillä ollut vaikutusta synnytystapaan. Sokeritasapaino insuliini- ja metformiinilääkityksen aikana oli yhtäläinen arvioitaessa sitä HbA1c- ja fruktosamiinimittauksilla, mutta 21 % metformiinin käyttäjistä tarvitsi lisäksi insuliinia hyvän sokeritasapainon saavuttamiseksi. Tutkimuksesssa todettiin, että mitä iäkkäämpi äiti oli, mitä varhaisemmassa raskauden vaiheessa sokerirasitus oli tehty ja lääkitys aloitettu, ja mitä korkeammat HbA1c ja fruktosamiinipitoisuudet olivat, sitä suuremmalla todennäköisyydellä metformiinin lisänä tarvittiin insuliinia.

Statin Adherence, Utilisation, and Prescribing Patterns. Improving effectiveness of treatment

Statins are one of the most widely studied and evidence-based medications. Randomised controlled trials have provided convincing evidence on the benefits of statin therapy in preventing cardiovascular events. Despite proven benefits, low costs, and few adverse effects, everyday effectiveness of statins is limited, since adherence to statin therapy is poor. This thesis was conducted as four pharmacoepidemiological studies using register data on statin users in real clinical care. The main purpose of the study was to evaluate prescribing patterns and to discover the lifestyle factors predicting statin nonadherence and discontinuation. This knowledge is essential in order to help physicians to motivate the adherence of their patients to treatment. In Finland, from 1998 to 2004, the number of statin initiators nearly doubled. The discovered channelling of atorvastatin and simvastatin may have affected the treatment outcomes at the public health level. It is possible that money spent on statins in Finland in 1998‒2004 could have been used in a more cost-effective way. In 2015, the percentage of patients receiving reimbursement for statins was 12% of the total population. Thus, it is a major public health and economic challenge to improve statin effectiveness and allocate therapy correctly. Among the participants with cardiovascular comorbidities, risky alcohol use or clustering of lifestyle risks were predictors of nonadherence. In addition, the prevalence of nonadherence to statins increased after retirement among both men and women. This increase in post-retirement nonadherence was highest among those receiving statins for secondary prevention. Discontinuation of statin therapy was predicted by high patient co-payment, and in women, by risky alcohol use. Recognising the predictors of nonadherence to statins is important because nonadherence is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and higher healthcare costs. In conclusion, optimal outcomes in medical therapy require both efficacious medications and adherence to those treatments. When prescribing statins to eligible patients, the physician’s clinical expertise in recognising patients at risk of statin discontinuation and nonadherence, as well as their ability to increase adherence, may have a great effect on public health.