Chemical Biology Screen for Prostate Cancer Therapeutics

Prostate cancer initially responds to hormone-based therapeutics such as anti-androgen treatment or chemotherapeutics but eventually becomes resistant. Novel treatment options are therefore urgently needed. This thesis study applied a high-throughput screen of 4910 known drugs and drug-like small molecules to identify compounds that selectively inhibit growth of prostate cancer cells. In addition, the mechanisms underlying the cellular sensitivity to potent cancer selective compounds were addressed. Surprisingly, many of the compounds currently used in the clinics or studied in clinical trials were not cancer-selective. Only four drugs, aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor disulfiram (Antabus), antibiotic ionophore monensin, histone deacetylase inhibitor tricostatin A and fungicide thiram inhibited prostate cancer cell growth at nanomolar concentrations without major effects on non-malignant prostate epithelial cells. Disulfiram, monensin and a structurally similar compound to monensin, salinomycin, induced oxidative stress and inhibited aldehyde dehydrogenase activity. Moreover, monensin and salinomycin reduced androgen receptor signalling and steroidogenesis, enforced cell differentiation and reduced the overall levels of cancer stem cells. Taken together, novel and potentially prostate cancer-selective therapeutic agents were identified in this study, including the description of a multitude of intoxicating mechanisms such as those relating to oxidative stress. The results provide novel insights into prostate cancer biology and exemplify useful means of considering novel approaches to cancer treatment.

The Role of PME-1 in Cancer: Therapeutic Implication

Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) plays a major role in maintaining cellular signaling homeostasis in human cells by reversibly affecting the phosphorylation of a variety of proteins. Protein phosphatase methylesterase-1 (PME-1) negatively regulates PP2A activity by reversible demethylation and active site binding. Thus far, it is known that overexpression of PME-1 in human gliomas contributes to ERK pathway signaling, cell proliferation, and malignant progression. Whether PME-1-mediated PP2A inhibition promotes therapy resistance in gliomas is unknown. Specific PP2A targets regulated by PME-1 in cancers also remain elusive. Additionally, whether oncogenic function of PME-1 can be generalized to various human cancers needs to be investigated. This study demonstrated that PME-1 expression promotes kinase inhibitor resistance in glioblastoma (GBM). PME-1 silencing sensitized GBM cells to a group of clinically used indolocarbazole multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). To facilitate the quantitative evaluation of MKIs by cancer-cell specific colony formation assay, Image-J software-plugin ‘ColonyArea’ was developed. PME-1-silencing was found to reactivate specific PP2A complexes and affect PP2A-target histone deacetylase HDAC4 activity. The HDAC4 inhibition induced synthetic lethality with MKIs similar to PME-1 depletion. However, synthetic lethality by both approaches required co-expression of a pro-apoptotic protein BAD. In gliomas, PME-1 and HDAC4 expression was associated with malignant progression. Using tumor PME-1, HDAC4 and BAD expression based stratification signatures this study defined patient subgroups that are likely to respond to MKI alone or in combination with HDAC4 inhibitor therapies. In contrast to the oncogenic role of PME-1 in certain cancer types, this study established that colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with high tumor PME-1 expression display favorable prognosis. Interestingly, PME-1 regulated survival signaling did not operate in CRC cells. Summarily, this study potentiates the candidacy of PME-1 as a therapy target in gliomas, but argues against generalization of these findings to other cancers, especially CRC.