Metsäteollisuuden jätevedenpuhdistamon lietteiden vaihtoehtoiset käsittelymenetelmät.

Työ on tehty osana ympäristöklusterin tutkimusohjelmaa "Materiaalivirrat ja energiankäyttö metsäteollisuusintegraatissa ja niihin liittyvät toimintastrategiat ympäristövaikutuslähtöisesti". Juha Räsänen on tehnyt metsäteollisuuden sivuainevirroista projektissa perusselvityksen, joka on tämän työn pohjana. Työn tavoitteena on ollut selvittää neljän itäsuomalaisen metsäteollisuusintegraatin tapauksissa vaihtoehtoisten lietteenkäsittelymenetelmien tekninen ja taloudellinen soveltuvuus nykyiseen käsittelyyn verrattuna. Tutkimuksessa hyödynnettiin aikaisempia tutkimustuloksia ja eri laitevalmistajien ja metsäteollisuusintegraattien kokemuksia. Työssä esitettäviä arvioita voidaan hyödyntää myös sektoritasolla. Metsäteollisuuden jätevedenpuhdistamon lietteistä käsiteltävyyden kannalta vaativin on bioliete, jonka osuuden kasvaessa perinteinen mekaaninen puristaminen ja poltto vaikeutuvat useilla tehtailla merkittävästikin nykyään ja lähivuosina. Polton ongelmat ja niistä aiheutuva ajoittainen aumakompostointitarve voivat puoltaa joko sekalietteen termistä tai biotermistä kuivausta ennen polttamista. Toinen tapa ratkaista lieteongelma on käsitellä bio- ja primäärilietteet erikseen. Biolietteen lipeälinjakäsittelyssä liete lingotaan, käsitellään mustalipeällä, haihdutetaan ja poltetaan soodakattilassa. Bioliete voidaan myös mädättää ja käsitellä sen jälkeen perinteisessä mekaanisessa puristuksessa. Kaikki käsitellyt menetelmät ovat teknisesti toteutettavissa, kunhan tietyt prosessireunaehdot täyttyvät. Vaihtoehtoiset käsittelymenetelmät vähentävät lietteen jäteluonnetta, mutta vastaavasti kustannukset lisääntyvät usein merkittävästi. Menetelmien käytöstä aiheutuvat integraatin puhdistamolietteen käsittelyn kokonaiskustannukset laskettiin työn osana olevalla taulukkolaskentasovelluksella laitetoimittajien budjettitarjouksia hyödyntäen. Biolietteen poltto soodakattilassa tarjoaa kustannusten kannalta houkuttelevimman ratkaisun. Työhön sisältyvää laskentamenettelyä voidaan soveltaa periaatteessa minkä tahansa metsäteollisuusintegraatin tapaukseen.

Project Charter, Scope, and Time Management In the Movie Industry

This thesis explores how the project charter development, project scope management, and project time management are executed in a Finnish movie production. The deviations and analogies between a case movie production and best practices suggested in PMBOK are presented. Empirical material from the case is gathered with two semi-structured interviews with a producer and a line producer. The interview data is categorized according to PMBOK knowledge areas. The analysis is complemented with movie industry specific norms found in popular movie production guides. The described and observed methods are linked together and the relationship between them is discussed. The project charter development, which is referred as a green light process in the movie industry, is mostly analogous between all areas. The deviations are in the level of formality. The green lighting in the case movie was accomplished without bureaucratic reports described in movie production guides. The empirical material shows that project management conventions and movie industry employ similar methods especially in scope management. Project management practices introduce a work breakdown structure (WBS) method, and movie production accomplishes the same task by developing a shooting script. Time management of the case movie deviates on most parts from the methods suggested in PMBOK. The major deviation is resource management. PMBOK suggests creating a resource breakdown structure. The case movie production accomplished this through budgeting process. Furthermore the popular movie production guides also disregard resource management as sovereign process. However the activity listing is quite analogous between the case movie and PMBOK. The final key observation is that although there is a broad set of effective and detailed movie industry specific methods, a comprehensive methodology that would cover the whole production process, such as Prince2 or Scrum, seems to be missing from the movie industry.

Project charter, scope, and time management in the movie industry

This thesis explores how the project charter development, project scope management, and project time management are executed in a Finnish movie production. The deviations and analogies between a case movie production and best practices suggested in PMBOK are presented. Empirical material from the case is gathered with two semi-structured interviews with a producer and a line producer. The interview data is categorized according to PMBOK knowledge areas. The analysis is complemented with movie industry specific norms found in popular movie production guides. The described and observed methods are linked together and the relationship between them is discussed. The project charter development, which is referred as a green light process in the movie industry, is mostly analogous between all areas. The deviations are in the level of formality. The green lighting in the case movie was accomplished without bureaucratic reports described in movie production guides. The empirical material shows that project management conventions and movie industry employ similar methods especially in scope management. Project management practices introduce a work breakdown structure (WBS) method, and movie production accomplishes the same task by developing a shooting script. Time management of the case movie deviates on most parts from the methods suggested in PMBOK. The major deviation is resource management. PMBOK suggests creating a resource breakdown structure. The case movie production accomplished this through budgeting process. Furthermore the popular movie production guides also disregard resource management as sovereign process. However the activity listing is quite analogous between the case movie and PMBOK. The final key observation is that although there is a broad set of effective and detailed movie industry specific methods, a comprehensive methodology that would cover the whole production process, such as Prince2 or Scrum, seems to be missing from the movie industry.

The legal framework for energy provisions in the European Union – With special regard to providing of energy provisions within the scope of Article 194(2) TFEU

The thesis interprets the caveat of Article 194(2) TFEU in order to assess the use of the Article as a legal basis for energy provisions provided by the European Union. The research subject is the Energy Title in the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union and the possibilities of the application of the legal basis provided therein. The purpose is analysis of the possibilities for providing of provisions within the scope of the caveat found in Article 194(2) TFEU with special regard to the possibilities of providing renewable energy legislation. The purpose of the thesis is on one hand to provide an overview of the premises for providing of energy provisions in the EU, and on the other hand to analyse the Treaty text in order to determine the legal basis for energy provisions. The ultimate objective is to determine the correct legal basis for renewable energy provisions, aimed at the mitigation of climate change. According to Article 194(2) TFEU, the practice of the shared legislative powers in the field of energy are restricted by the retention of certain energy matters within the power of the Member States. The wording of the caveat containing the restrictions is open to interpretation and has been a subject of extensive discussion. Many scholars have argued that the caveat in Article 194(2) TFEU might obstruct decision-making in energy matters. This argument is contested, and the factual impact of the codification of the energy competences is analysed. The correct legal basis for energy provisions depends on the final interpretation of the text of the caveat and the level of significance of the effect of the measure. The use of Article 194(2) TFEU as a legal basis might not be the only option. There is a possibility that the legal bases within the Environmental Title might be used as legal bases for energy provisions in addition to Article 194(2) TFEU.

The legal framework for energy provisions in the European Union – With special regard to providing of energy provisions within the scope of Article 194(2) TFEU

The thesis interprets the caveat of Article 194(2) TFEU in order to assess the use of the Article as a legal basis for energy provisions provided by the European Union. The research subject is the Energy Title in the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union and the possibilities of the application of the legal basis provided therein. The purpose is analysis of the possibilities for providing of provisions within the scope of the caveat found in Article 194(2) TFEU with special regard to the possibilities of providing renewable energy legislation. The purpose of the thesis is on one hand to provide an overview of the premises for providing of energy provisions in the EU, and on the other hand to analyse the Treaty text in order to determine the legal basis for energy provisions. The ultimate objective is to determine the correct legal basis for renewable energy provisions, aimed at the mitigation of climate change. According to Article 194(2) TFEU, the practice of the shared legislative powers in the field of energy are restricted by the retention of certain energy matters within the power of the Member States. The wording of the caveat containing the restrictions is open to interpretation and has been a subject of extensive discussion. Many scholars have argued that the caveat in Article 194(2) TFEU might obstruct decision-making in energy matters. This argument is contested, and the factual impact of the codification of the energy competences is analysed. The correct legal basis for energy provisions depends on the final interpretation of the text of the caveat and the level of significance of the effect of the measure. The use of Article 194(2) TFEU as a legal basis might not be the only option. There is a possibility that the legal bases within the Environmental Title might be used as legal bases for energy provisions in addition to Article 194(2) TFEU.