Suorituskyvyn mittaaminen valmistavan yrityksen logistiikkatoiminnoissa

Yrityksen hakiessa kasvua vientimarkkinoilta sen logistiikka nousee entistä tärkeämpään rooliin. Jotta tuotteet ovat kilpailukykyisiä kansainvälisillä markkinoilla, tulee tuotteen hinta – laatu – suhde olla kohdallaan, jolloin logistiikan kustannusten pienentäminen ja laadukas toimitusketju ovat varsin keskeisiä tavoitteita. Toimitusketjun eri vaiheiden laatu korostuu, kun kyseessä on räätälöity tuote, jota ei voida korvata varastossa olevalla tuotteella. Näiden tavoitteiden saavuttaminen edellyttää logistiikkaprosessien suorituskyvyn mittaamista ja kehittämistä. Suorituskyvyn mittaamisen avulla voidaan viestiä logistiikalle asetetut tavoitteet ja seurata tavoitteiden toteutumista Tämän työn tavoitteena oli selvittää, miten suorituskykyä voidaan mitata valmistavan yrityksen logistiikkatoiminnoissa. Tarkasteltavana olivat logistiikan prosessit tilauksen vahvistamisesta valmiin tuotteen toimittamiseen asiakkaalle. Työn alussa käytiin läpi suorituskyvyn mittaamista yleisellä tasolla sekä logistiikan mittaamista ja mittareita. Tämän jälkeen aloitettiin mittausjärjestelmän suunnittelu kohdeyrityksen logistiikkaosastolle, sen vision ja strategian pohjalta. Työn tuloksena kohdeyrityksen logistiikkaosastolle kehitettiin suorituskykymittaristo mittareineen. Mittareita eri logistiikkatoimintojen mittaamiseen on varsin runsaasti, ja kaikkia niitä ei ole järkevä liittää osaksi mittaristoa, mutta tilanteiden muuttuessa niitä voidaan vaihtaa tai lisätä tarpeen mukaan.

Offshoring and outsourcing under demand uncertainty -a supply chain management analysis

Outsourcing and offshoring or any combinations of these have not just become a popular phenomenon, but are viewed as one of the most important management strategies due to the new possibilities from globalization. They have been seen as a possibility to save costs and improve customer service. Executing offshoring and offshore outsourcing successfully can be more complex than initially expected. Potential cost savings resulting from of offshoring and offshore outsourcing are often based on lower manufacturing costs. However, these benefits might be conflicted by a more complex supply chain with service level challenges that can respectively increase costs. Therefore analyzing the total cost effects of offshoring and outsourcing is necessary. The aim of this Master´s Thesis was to to construct a total cost model using academic literature to calculate the total costs and analyze the reasonability of offshoring and offshore outsourcing production of a case company compared to insourcing production. The research data was mainly quantitative and collected mainly from the case company past sales and production records. In addition management level interviews from the case company were conducted. The information from these interviews was used for the qualification of the necessary quantitative data and adding supportive information that could not be gathered from the quantitative data. Both data collection and analysis were guided by a theoretical frame of reference that was based on academic literature concerning offshoring and outsourcing, statistical calculation of demand and total costs. The results confirm the theories that offshoring and offshore outsourcing would reduce total costs as both offshoring and offshore outsourcing options result in lower total annual costs than insourcing mainly due to lower manufacturing costs. However, increased demand uncertainty would make the alternative of offshore outsourcing more risky and difficult to manage. Therefore when assessing the overall impact of the alternatives, offshoring is the most preferable option. As the main cost savings in offshore outsourcing came from lower manufacturing costs, more specifically labour costs, the logistics costs in this case company did not have an essential effect in total costs. The management should therefore pay attention initially to manufacturing costs and then logistics costs when choosing the best production sourcing option for the company.

The role of public export promotion in Finland Industry view of public export promotion in Southwest Finland

The role of the public export promotion in Finland needed more research. The part of the public sector export promotion in the overall export is significant. In an ever more global world not only the companies but also the counties compete against each other and the governments have an interest to boost their economy as much as they are able to. Every industrialized country has export promotion services in some form or another. In the 21st century the tendency has been the bundling of the services and this has also been done in Finland with Team Finland. The role and the efficiency of the services provided deserve more research. The research question of this study is: What is the role of the public export promotion services in Finland? The question is researched primary by expert interviews conducted for this study. The situation in Southwest Finland is studied from the viewpoint of the companies of the region by conducting a survey aimed to the successfully internationalized companies of the region and asking them on their views on the impact and role of public export services in their internationalization. The theory base is formed out of various export promotion studies, studies monitoring the effects of the promotion and theories of the internationalization process of companies. The primary material for the study are the three expert interviews conducted and the answers to the survey conducted. The research method in the first part is a constructive qualitative research. The research approach in the second part, where the views of the companies in Southwest Finland are studied, is quantitative. The study findings from the expert interviews: the aligning of the public export promotion done in Finland to the previous research and the addition of the role of the public sector in classical frameworks. The study findings from the survey: the utilizing of the public export promotion services is heavily delayed and the internationalizing companies start to utilize the services very late in their internationalization process, the average being 10,3 years from the beginning of the internationalization. Another central finding from the survey is that the successfully internationalized companies see the public export promotion services generally as highly beneficial but in the light of the answers the effect on their own company is not as significant. Concluding can be stated that the public export promotion is seen as beneficial, but the monitoring of the efficiency is complicated in the case of services. Getting the companies to start utilizing the services earlier in their internationalization needs attention from the service providers. By communicating the achieved results and benefits better to the potential users of the services the internationalization process of the companies could be accelerated