"Sanat ja asiat"

Suomentanut Markku Koivusalo.

Seksualiteetti ja valta

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Gender-tutkimuksen uusi vuosikymmen : queer theory

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Halu ja nautinto

Kääntänyt ranskan kielestä Jussi Vähäm��ki.

"Litteraturen, det är vad man undervisar om" : det svenska litteraturdidaktiska fältet i förvandling

Under slutet av 1900-talet och början av 2000-talet har ett nytt litteraturdidaktiskt forskningsfält vuxit sig allt starkare i Sverige, samtidigt som litteraturens ställning i samhälle och skola har försvagats. För att söka förstå en sådan paradox undersöker Peter Degerman hur frågor om litteraturens legitimitet och funktion besvaras i den litteraturdidaktiska forskningen. Varför bör vi egentligen läsa och studera skönlitteratur, och vad kan en litteraturpedagogisk forskning säga oss om litteraturens värde? Avhandlingens analysmetod är inspirerad av Michel Foucault, såväl begreppsligt som i genomförandet, vilket betyder att undersökningen framför allt riktar in sig på litteraturdidaktiken i termer av ett ”spridningsm��nster” av ett antal ”diskursivt formerade vetenskapliga utsagor” som konstruerar sitt objekt eller en ”objektdom��n” – ”en korpus av påståenden som hålls för sanna”. Litteraturdidaktikens huvudsakliga objektdom��n, dess utskilda objekt, är litteraturläsningen. Det som gör litteraturdidaktiken till vetenskap – connaissance – är dess speciella avgränsning mot andra vetenskapliga områden, samtidigt som litteraturdidaktiken, som connaissance är beroende av förhållandet till ett speciellt episteme – ett större diskursivt fält som m��jliggör vetenskapen. En ny vetenskap, som litteraturdidaktiken, uppstår i brottet mot ett större samhälleligt vetande, ett vetande vilket i detta fall kan återfinnas i utbildningssystemet, politiska opinioner, massmediala debatter etc. Det som är m��jligt att säga inom området för litteraturdidaktik eller litteraturpedagogik begränsas emellertid av det som i avhandlingen benämns ”klassrummets princip”. Förhållandet mellan skilda litterära repertoarer – exempelvis mellan lärare och elev – eller mellan subjektiva och objektiva läsningar, mellan olika texttyper, knyts till klassrummet i betydelsen av en kontext för den pedagogiska situationen. Ytterst sett är det den litteraturdidaktiska forskningens relevans för klassrummets praktik som avgränsar den litteraturdidaktiska dom��nen.

Oppineesti luonnosta, kestävyydestä ja kasvatuksesta

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Eväitä kasvatustieteen kriittiseen itseymmärrykseen

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Extremfall, stjärnelever och verktygsskramlare : en diskursanalytisk studie av lärares tal om studerande som behöver särskilt stöd

The groups within Finnish vocational upper secondary education and training (VET) are often heterogeneous with respect to the student's need for support in their studies. According to the national core curricula, Special Education Needs (SEN) students should in the first place, get their education in the same group as everyone else. This dissertation aims to clarify and create an understanding about how the ideals and intention of equality in education is constructed in communication among teachers in VET in the Swedish-speaking parts of Finland. Through this understanding it should be possible to highlight a potential which could ultimately contribute to a positive development of a more inclusive education within VET. The epistemological platform of the study is to be found within the post structuralist philosophy of language that is considered as subsumed in a social constructionist thinking. The data has been collected through focus group discussions in groups of 3–6 participants (teachers) in seven schools in Finnish-Swedish VET. The analyses are based on a discursive psychological analysis combined with an analysis based on Michel Foucault's concepts with an emphasis on the subject, government and power. Four discourser where identified in the analysis of teachers' constructions of the educational assignment in relation to SEN students. The most dominant was discussing the educational assignment as a pragmatic project i.e. as a matter of transmission of knowledge. The discourse included both interpretative repertoires where the heterogeneous group was constructed as self-evident and possible to manage as well as a constructed as an impossible project. The educational assignment was also constructed as a holistic project, as part of a democratic project, and as a labor market project. Each discourse contains both including as well as excluding features in relation to SEN students. The development of an inclusive practice can and should therefore include elements from all of them. Three discourses were identified in the analysis concerning teachers' versions of SEN students: students with difficulties and problems; students who do not use or do not have ability and students who are irresponsible and lack the will to study. Within the various discourses and interpretative repertoires were both constructs when teachers described a concern and kindness in relation to the individual SEN student and constructions where teachers mainly expressed fears that other students in the group would be negatively affected by students in need of special support. Results from the third research question conclude the results from the two others, the analysis is done out of a government perspective. In the material use of different government techniques are identified: disciplinary power through direct reprimands; pastoral power by a desire of insight in order to promote the opportunities for consultation and the use of bio-power that primarily focuses on what is best for the population and whose tool racism results in a legitimation of the exclusion of SEN students. The conclusion is that teachers in VET need to pay attention to inclusive and exclusive elements identified in various discourses.

Valotuksia aikamme viitatuimman yhteiskuntatieteilijän ajatteluun

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Point Of No Return: Dope Sick Love and Reindeerspotting as Documentaries of Addiction

In this postgraduate thesis the focus is on two documentary films, Renaud Brothers's Dope Sick Love (2005) and Joonas Neuvonen's Reindeerspotting (2010). In both of these films, addicts are on limelight. The directors of both films follow addicts and their everyday lives on streets with handheld cameras. This thesis will analyze and compare the narratives of these addicts. Do these documentaries affirm to the existing conventions, according to which representations of addicts and addiction are always either miraculous survival stories or stories, which always end up in utter decadence. The main questions this thesis proposes, are how addicts and their narratives are being handled in the two case study films, and how the drug cultures depicted in the films differ from each other. What changes between New York City and Rovaniemi, Northern Finland, and what remains the same. The academic and theoretical framework of this thesis consists of Susanna Helke's doctoral thesis Nanookin jälki, where the history of documentary films' methods and approaches are discussed. Additionally, the thinking is heavily informed by such poststructuralist writers as Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Louis Althusser, Stuart Hall and Chris Weedon.